Jump to content

  • Log In with Google      Sign In   
  • Create Account

FREE SOFTWARE GIVEAWAY

We have 4 x Pro Licences (valued at $59 each) for 2d modular animation software Spriter to give away in this Thursday's GDNet Direct email newsletter.


Read more in this forum topic or make sure you're signed up (from the right-hand sidebar on the homepage) and read Thursday's newsletter to get in the running!


m.m.fox

Member Since 31 Aug 2012
Offline Last Active Sep 22 2012 12:32 PM

Posts I've Made

In Topic: Nearing beta, need help with user friendliness

17 September 2012 - 06:40 AM

yeah, i'd say that looks _much_ better overall - glad you lost that background.
maybe the icons on the avatar frame might be not recognized as icons tho', i'd imagine some players might think those are merely decorative elements.

In Topic: Nearing beta, need help with user friendliness

14 September 2012 - 12:58 PM

i didn't read all the others posts, and didn't have chance yet to try your game, but what i can tell from you initial post is:


there seems to be way to much going on - which means that the player will have to read a lot, and not play; as axel cholewa puts it in his post on gamastura: "Players want to play. If you want to teach players, make them play!" (http://gamasutra.com/blogs/AxelCholewa/20120808/175498/Players_dont_want_to_read.php)

so what you may ask yourself is: how far can i strip all this stuff down so that the game is still playable? and how can i introduce all those features gradually?
introducing all these mechanics (and thusly the corresponding parts in the interface) at a time would give you a lot of advantages:
x you can provide a smooth learning curve
x you gain rewards for your player, in unlocking all those functionality in a gradual fashion - "oh sweet, i can trade resources now?"
x you won't alienate players by providing (on the first glance) a too complex interface
...

and is it really necessary providing all the different resources right from the start? john shafer (civ5) for example said: "We didn’t bother teaching the player what iron or other strategic resources were good for until it actually mattered." (http://jonshaferondesign.com/2012/04/16/loweringthegates/)

it also seems to me that the option to configure your keys might be a little out of place in the first screenshot - i don't think that players will want to change the controls too often, so i suggest to put it somewhere less prominent.

i think a few icons might also make things more appealing - for example for the equipment slots etc.

other thoughts:
i think the disband button should be nearer to the champion himself, i wouldn't name the exit-button "exit" - as some players might think it may leave the game itself, aaand.. there doesn't seem to be such an exit button from inside the upgrade-menu (which is actually on the same layer as the champion-button?)

so i hope i made some sense/didn't just repeat what has already been said,
best of luck for you beta! keep it up

In Topic: Tutorials - How to Learn a Game's Mechanics

07 September 2012 - 12:28 PM

hm, well it's a little hard to say anything without a screenshot or a capture, but since you said you had collectibles i would use them as a guide rather than any sort of on-hud-arrows (and since you seem to be in a position to do playtesting i'd definitely give this method shot), so that the level design itself guides the player. but it depends on the mechanics already taught of course. (not sure what you mean by "dual touch controls")

but what i generally think is that touch devices are intrinsically intuitive, so a bloated hud/interface is more likely to "overcomplicate" things.
all the best!

In Topic: How can I train myself to come up with simpler ideas?

03 September 2012 - 03:30 PM

well you know the saying: something is perfect as soon as you can't take anything away from it, not when you can not add an additional thing. just try to be.. really "honest" and ask yourself "would it be still the same idea/game/mechanic if i took x away?" repeat over and over ^^

all the best!

In Topic: Game Design With Shapes

01 September 2012 - 10:14 AM

interesting thoughts - from what i know i had always been a very important task in the evolution of mankind to recognize faces asap. (identifying prey, predators, mating partners, etc.) so this is pretty much why we tend to see faces everywhere. (a phenomenon called pareidolia) there's even a dedicated area in the brain for (at least many believe) this particular task. http://en.wikipedia....iform_face_area
i don't know if this information is of any use to you, but this would be a pretty decent read on this subject (amongst others), should you be interested: http://www.amazon.de...46516013&sr=8-1

PARTNERS