Jump to content

  • Log In with Google      Sign In   
  • Create Account


Member Since 19 Dec 2001
Offline Last Active Feb 20 2012 03:41 PM

Posts I've Made

In Topic: Debate me about the bible

29 May 2011 - 11:32 AM

A. God didn't create Adam and Steve, it was Adam and Eve. People think sexual attraction is genetic? LMAO, but if it was then you simply would not be able to like Baseball if you were genetically born to like Football. People learn to like things by thinking, yes thoughts count. Add emotional attachment and confusion to it and you get homosexuals.

God didn't create Steve? Really? You can laugh at the idea that sexual orientation is genetic if you want, but your sports preference analogy is the really laughable idea. Do you realize the implications of your reasoning? You're saying that the only reason you're not gay is because you didn't grow up around gay people, just as you don't like cricket because you didn't grow up in Pakistan or India or in a place where people play cricket. Beyond that, your reasoning that people learn their sexual orientation by thinking about it suggests that maybe you're covering up for some religiously incorrect thoughts of your own and had to think yourself straight for fear of hell fire and damnation (or more likely fear of extreme social stigma and isolation). So when did you think yourself straight? Was it during puberty when your hormones raged?

B. They found Noah's Ark, The Ark of the Covenant, The parting place for the Red Sea, they found Mount Sinai where God gave the 10 Commandments, and they also found a lot of artifacts for ancient Jewish battles and communities. You need to do some research bro since your still a baby Christian.

They found Noah's Ark? Really? They found the Ark of the Covenant? I saw that movie too! Back when I was 13. I sat through it twice, it was so good!

A baby Christian? Seriously. Christianity doesn't deserve your arrogance. Heckuva sales job!

If you think I'm closed minded, well then you're the one with your head jammed into your butt.

I think you're close minded, no matter how much time you spend studying. Your silly sports preference reasoning exposes you. For all the studying you do, you should have been able to come up with a better argument than that.

In Topic: Osama Bin Laden is Dead.

02 May 2011 - 09:47 PM

What makes you think he's been dead for years?

French, Australian, Saudi and Pakistani intelligence said so.
Afghan President Hamid Karzai said so.
Pakistani presidents Asif Ali Zardari and Pervez Musharraf said so.
Boston University and the Australian National University said so.
FBI Counterterrorism chief Dale Watson said so.
The CIA disbanded it's Bin Laden unit five years ago.

I doubt that he's been dead for a while, AQ or some similar organization would've done something like step up attack against coalition forces in either Iraq or Afghanistan in revenge and would've made it well known why they were doing it.

He reportedly died peacefully of disease + natural causes, not coalition bombs.

Karzai, Zardari and Musharraf have zero credibility. The CIA disbanded it's bin Laden unit because Bush said he wasn't concerned about bin Laden. <a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2011/05/02/bush-bin-laden/">FLASHBACK: Bush On Bin Laden: ‘I Really Just Don’t Spend That Much Time On Him’</a>

If the assault was staged, why didn't the Bush administration stage one of their own so as to take credit for his death? Already Bush supporters are trying to steal credit from Obama, some members of Congress have even gone as far as issuing statements vindicating the use of torture, claiming that torture provided the intelligence that lead to the successful assault (even though it would be more accurate to say that torture delayed getting the intelligence)... <a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2011/05/02/right-reax-bin-laden/">Right Rushes To Praise Bush For Obama’s Order To Kill Bin Laden</a>

In Topic: Are Republicans really serious about reducing the deficit

21 February 2011 - 10:43 PM

If Republicans were serious about reducing the deficit they would have allowed the Bush tax breaks for billionaires to expire. What they're serious about is cutting government to the bone to eliminate any obstacles that might stand in the way of the rule of their corporate puppet masters. They simply lack the courage to admit that's what they're about, so they create a bogus budget crisis in order to ram their desires down every one's throats (Wisconsin!). Rush Limbaugh says as much every time he prattles on about taking it in the ass and getting it shoved down his throat and all that homo-psycho-sexual talk he likes to employ to stir the loins of his most rabid fans. There are still 15 million unemployed workers in the United States. The austerity programs the Republicans are championing will swell that number. Boehner knows it and doesn't care ("So be it!"). Look at what happened in the UK. The Tory's pushed austerity and their economy shrank. Double dip recession! Yeah! The Republicans probably think that increased unemployment will make Obama's reelection difficult and stopping that from happening is all they really care about. They want power and they'll do and say anything they have to in order to get it. They don't have a clear idea of what they want to do with that power - at least not one they're willing to share with the public. Whatever their plan it probably involves destroying labor unions and the Democratic Party, privatizing social security, banning abortion, militarizing the border with Mexico and a host of other unsavory actions that they know the public would never honestly accept.

Corporations to Government: Give Us More, Tax Us Less

What Conservatives Really Want

In Topic: I got beat up by a cop

19 February 2011 - 05:01 PM

Talk to the lawyer your friends suggested. My guess is that nothing will come from it all anyway, but at least by talking to a lawyer you'll get better legal advice than what you'll get from us.

In Topic: Beam me up!

06 January 2011 - 07:53 PM

I've been slacking. Spooky Vision (4/27/2009) Can you see without looking? ... "more photons in some places than there should have been and fewer in others." In some places the number of photons was actually less than zero. A stunning result using weak measurement. Demonstrates that nature is indeed real when unobserved. Confirms metaphysical realism. Metaphysical realism is the hypothesis that the universe is presumed real independently of human observers.

Success teleporting information between photons over a free space distance of nearly ten miles ~ 15 km - "entanglement ensures that changing the state of one causes the other to change as well, allowing the teleportation of quantum information" ... "They found that the distant photon was still able to respond to changes in state of the photon they held onto even at this unprecedented distance." ... "able to maintain the fidelity of the long-distance teleportation at 89 percent" that is "decent enough for information" but not for matter.

[Edited by - LessBread on January 7, 2011 2:53:28 AM]