Jump to content
  • Advertisement
  • 09/09/19 02:20 AM

    Madsen's Musings Ep.21: What to call yourself when starting out?

    Music and Sound FX


    In this episode of Madsen's Musings, I discuss what to call yourself when first getting started as an audio professional.
    Wanna learn more about me or my work?  Go here: https://madsenstudios.com/
    Subscribe to my YouTube channel or follow me here on GameDev.net to see all the latest updates.

    A transcript is provided below the video.

    Okay, so this is a really quick mini-vlog, but I watched an interview with CLA today - Chris Lord-Alge.  It was a really good interview for the most part, I enjoyed it: lots of really good quotes and tidbits of information in there, but here's one thing I did not enjoy - or one thing where I perhaps understand what CLA is saying but I don't totally buy into or agree to it, and that is the notion of... he was basically ranting about the fact that people call themselves mixing engineers, and he felt like he had to earn that.  

    He used the analogy of the military saying "you're not a General, you're a Private", you're just starting out, don't call yourself a mixing engineer, and I get the fact that he's talking about back in the day the way it worked is you had to work up different things: you're an assistant, you had to do this type of prep, and then you shut up, and you stood back, and you let the professionals do certain things that they were doing whether they are the engineer or the producer, or they're the mixing/mastering engineer, whatever it is - they had a very structured path or progression you went up through and you didn't just say "I'm a mixing engineer".

    So I get what he's saying, and to a degree I agree with it, but I also feel like there's a danger to saying you have to reach a certain threshold before you can say you're X, Y, or Z.  A perfect analogy is I play saxophone - I have two degrees in it, so can I say that I'm a saxophonist if I don't play at the same level as a Jeff Coffin, a Bob Reynolds, you know, a Joshua Redmond, a Branford Marsalis?  I don't play on the same level as those guys, so does that make me not a saxophonist?  I think it makes me a saxophonist in work in progress.  A saxophonist working towards something.  

    So I don't ever want to have that mentality of you're not a composer if you have not reached X or Y.  Maybe CLA, Chris Lord-Alge is trying to get at is if you haven't gone through and mastered all these other elements and you're just saying you're a mixer, then yeah, maybe pare back a little bit, but I also see that we're all works in progress, and I hope we're all continually advancing and growing, and learning and getting better.

    So that's just a little short tidbit, I hope it's helpful and encouraging.  Go out there, learn your stuff, always be a lifetime student, but at the same time don't be scared to say that you are X, Y and Z.  I don't know, I mean, that doesn't make sense.  I personally offer mixing as one of my services, but I also don't claim to be at the same level as a Chris Lord-Alge, or any of those people.  I'm still intermediate - and it shows in my price point too - it shows on my credit list, so I don't know - I'm kind of rambling, but that's something to think about.

    [Parting remarks]

      Report Article

    User Feedback

    There are no comments to display.

    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

  • Advertisement
  • Game Developer Survey


    We are looking for qualified game developers to participate in a 10-minute online survey. Qualified participants will be offered a $15 incentive for your time and insights. Click here to start!

    Take me to the survey!

  • Advertisement
  • Latest Featured Articles

  • Featured Blogs

  • Advertisement
  • Popular Now

  • Similar Content

    • By congard
      Q1: Does such a need arise at all? Or should the reflectance model be used globally for the entire scene?
      Q2: If it is necessary to implement in the shader switching between reflectance models (OrenNayar, Lambert etc), how to do it better? Create a separate shader for each reflectance model? Or use something like
      // fragment shader uniform float reflectanceModel; ... switch (reflectanceModel) { case 0.0: diffuse = lambert(...); break; case 1.0: diffuse = orenNayar(...); break; case 2.0: ... break; } I will be grateful for your advice
    • By QuoVadis
      Hi everyone,
      I'm new to this forum, just getting to know the lay of the land, so I'll just jump in with my question.
      After some intense development period that lasted 10 months, my friend The Programmer and I (The Designer) just launched our first FREE game on GooglePlay, called Starman Journey to Mars. For those interested, you can check it out in the link bellow.
      So now that production is done, we're stuck with the relatively unexpected challenge of actually promoting the game and getting players. To that end we welcome any advice about where we need to go from here and what we need to focus on. Can anyone help point us in the right direction? Any Marketing advice would be worth its weight in gold to us
      So far, our game has been received relatively well on the store but we are also interested in any feedback you might have, should you choose to play it.
      Do you like it? Any strong point or weaknesses we should be focusing on?
      Thanks in advance to anyone willing to take the time to answer or give the game a try.
      Starman Journey to Mars Team

    • By KrokoStudio
      Hello guys!
      This is the first game of our studio and we just released it on Play Store. Lighty Ghost is a little game where you need to touch the walls while avoiding to touch the spikes. The longer you stay alive, the bigger your score is. The little detail is the "green lights" multiplicators that encourage you to take risks in order to have bigger score. We already planned to launch on iOS when our account will be validated and to integrate a leaderboard (certainly based on facebook accounts) to compare with your friends in a version 2.
      We need advices to make the "green lights" multiplicators more understandable in the game. A lot of people think for the moment it is poison. Moreover, when you take a multiplicator, the next one will multiply by 2 again until you reach x16 which is the maximum. We tried to make it understand by adding the bubbles on top of our character and make the tail bigger each time. Do you have advices on that?
      Same for the gems, it is to buy characters. An idea to improve the understanding of this part?
      Thanks guys!
    • By JeremyAlessi
      In episode #2, Jeremy adds some formatting by covering the news, reflecting on the inspiration for PixelFest, and delving into an important developer lesson; that period of time everyone faces when they have to decide whether to play a game or make a game with their time.

      View full story
    • By JeremyAlessi
      In episode #2, Jeremy adds some formatting by covering the news, reflecting on the inspiration for PixelFest, and delving into an important developer lesson; that period of time everyone faces when they have to decide whether to play a game or make a game with their time.

Important Information

By using GameDev.net, you agree to our community Guidelines, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.

GameDev.net is your game development community. Create an account for your GameDev Portfolio and participate in the largest developer community in the games industry.

Sign me up!