Jump to content
  • Advertisement
  • 02/21/19 08:53 AM

    Five Nations - Unit Balancing - Episode 1

    Game Design and Theory

    Webellion

    About

    The following article is about how we have balanced units in our space sci-fi RTS, Five Nations. Five Nations is a futuristic real-time strategy game that follows the events of a mind-bending opera of space about the survival of humanity. As a game designer working on an RTS, the most demanding aspect of my job is to make fully balanced fractions with a great variety of units. Designing units, with unique attributes, interesting characteristics and construction processes is extremaly challenging the say the least.

    Resolution

    Our main goal is to design units with:

    • Unique roles,
    • Strengths and weaknesses,
    • Cool personality,
    • Balanced data and attributes.

    Step 1. Defining the Unit statistics

    Everything starts with the definition of the unit’s attributes:

    • Hull: used to specify the amount of damage a unit can withstand before it is destroyed.
    • Unit class: explained later.
    • Shield: energy field that could protect the unit’s Hull. Shields can be regenerate slowly. (there are a number of weapons that can pass the shield and hit directly the units hull)
    • Armor: a value which reduces the damages against the unit’s hull. (some weapons ignore the vessels armor). Armour does not affect shield damages.
    • Hangar capacity: represents how many “Fighter class” units can be carried.
    • Speed
    • Vision: Line of sight.
    • Collusion area: This value represents the unit’s size. Units with bigger collision area can be hit easily.
    • Weapons: A list of the unit’s primary and secondary armaments and equipments.
    • Resources:
      • Metal: Metal cost.
      • Helium-3: Helium-3 cost.
      • Tachyion: Tachyon cost. (usually, the capital ships requires tachyon.)
      • Place: Population cost.
      • Building time: How many seconds it takes for the unit to build.

    (It is likely that throughout the process of designing the units, the main attributes turn out imperfect and we need to go back and reach out for more variables.)

    gif opt fed06

     

    In Five Nations units are like “containers” which can have a wide variety of Weapons. These armaments and types of equipment define the units the best. Contrary to Starcraft: Brood War, Age of Empires where units usually have only one unique weapon we decided to provide ourselves with the ability to mix a wide range of instruments for each individual unit. Weapons main attributes are:

    • Damage to hull: Amount of damage the weapon does to the hull.
    • Damage to hull upg/level: How many additional damages the weapon deals per upgrade.
    • Damage to shield: Amount of damage the weapon does to shield.
    • Damage to shield upg/level: How many additional damages the weapon deals per upgrade.
    • Range: How far the weapon can shoot/effect.
    • Velocity: Projectile’s initial speed generated by the weapon.
    • Acceleration: Rate of change of velocity of the projectile with respect of time.
    • Max Velocity: Projectile’s maximum speed.
    • Accuracy: Weapons precision in %. 100 means the weapon’s projectile always hit the target point.
    • Splash dmg range: Range of damage unintentionally dealt with a unit not being directly targeted by the weapon
    • Splash dmg on allies?: Boolean of weapon can hit their allies.
    • Cooldown: Amount of time that the weapon must wait in between attacks.
    • Homing?: Boolean of weapon’s projectiles can follow its target.
    • Minimum range: A potential minimum distance a projectile can attack units.
    • CAF: Can aim Fighter class - some weapons can’t attack small, fighter class units. This boolean defines that the weapon can aim fighters.
    • CHF: Can hit Fighter class - there are possibilities to a weapon cannot aim fighters but can hit accidentally them. If this value is 0, the weapon cannot hit the fighters.
    • COAB: Can only aim Building - there are certain weapons that are specialized to destroy constructions and stations only.
    • Targeting: In Five Nations weapon’s projectiles/shells collide with hostile spacecraft or constructions regardless of their initial target. This solution offers many opportunities in micromanagement (for example player can place the big capital ships with a huge amount of hull and shield in the front line, while the smaller vulnerable “artillery” units attack from behind. Targeting=1 means that the unit’s projectile collides only with its target.
    • Specialty: Weapon unique abilities.

    FN ship flagship

     

    Okay, it can be seen, that we have a lot of data which can be variable and customizable the units. Initially, we thought it was enough to make unique units, counter units...etc. For example, we can make

    • units with a great amount of hull but lack of shield,
    • units which are specialized to tear down shields easily but weak against the hull.
    • fast and micro-oriented vessels,
    • artillery ships,
    • “sniper” units,
    • support units...etc.

    gif opt tho03 gif opt fed03

     

    Step 2. Traditional Balancing method - the Rock-paper-scissor solution

    “In most RTS games you would prefer if the players built several different kinds of units. A game could be interesting even with only one major unit type, but people may complain that it’s all about “massing units,” which will hurt your reviews. The standard way of enforcing this is to make sure that all units have at least one weakness. This weakness can be exploited by your opponent, and thus forcing you to mix up your units a little.” Oxeyegames.com

    Well, the article is absolutely right and this is equally the very foundation of balancing units in Five Nations. In this part we have decided to study the biggest RTS games on the market:

    • Empire Earth - one of my personal favorite childhood RTS, but the balancing was terrible: they used the simplest rock-paper-scissor method. Units can be too easy to kill with counter units. A lot of information, unit abilities wasn’t clear and wasn’t revealed during the game, and only can be found in long manuals. Another bullshit in this game is that the resource piles can’t be exrected.
    • Total Annihilation - great game with a huge variety of units. But most of the units are totally unused. So we decide to follow the “less is sometimes more” method. Another negative point is the economy which we found too simple to adapt in Five Nations.
    • Age of Empires 2 - This is a good game! I spent tons of hours playing with this precious. This games also follows the rock-paper-scissor method, but was much more balanced and more understandable than Empire Earth. When we took it again and played with it we noted a lot of useful solutions.
      • The game have more than 2 resources, in this way the economy was little more complicated than in other RTS games. We decided to use this kind of economy in Five Nations.
      • Great variety of research options.
      • Ages, the periods of civilization advancement in the game. Brilliant idea, but we couldn’t find its place in Five Nations.

    The only thing which we did not like in AoE2 that the units compared with starcraft are lack in characteristics.

    • Starcraft - This game is age like fine wine! A sample of the perfect balancing! I don’t think i have to introduce SC in detail, so let’s get to the solutions which we really like and try to adapt in Five Nations:
      • Types of buildings. Each race starts with a “Town hall” type building, where like in SC the almost all workers are produced, resources are collected and technology begins. There is some difference in Five Nations for example, workers don’t deliver the resources directly in the “Town hall”. Each race has a unique resource gathering method. For example in Human Federation the processing of raw materials is composed of two separate steps.
        • Step 1: The Engineer Shuttle obtains the raw material from the asteroid, then carries it to the Mining Station
        • Step 2: Icarus transports the processed raw materials to the Command Station, which – after the receipt – can immediately be used for building stations, manufacturing or developing space shuttles.
      • Unique races. All five races in Five nations have their own strengths and weaknesses as well units, structures, researches and micro/macro mechanics.
      • Micro- and Macromanagement. We really respects the developers and designers work in Blizzard. They make a brilliant micro and macro oriented game.
      • Cool unit personalities.

    EachEasyBustard size restricted

     

    Okay, now it may seem like we want to clone Starcraft. Actually, we want to make a different, deep space oriented game, but in any case we honestly admit that we learned a lot from it.

    • Command and Conquer Red Alert 2 - “Red Alert 2 is one of the most polished, best-conceived, and downright enjoyable real-time strategy games in recent memory.” The units in RA2 are an amazing mix of land, sea and air forces. Maybe the only problem is that the fractions are unbalanced. For example, the I win a lot of match with the allied by only producing rocketeers, but anyway the game had a lot of potential such as:
      • Mobile construction Vehicles (MCV): I personally really like this idea, a unit which is the foundation of field base by deploying into it. In the early state of the designing we wanted a planet/planemo colonization system in the game, but my colleague Bence suggested that do not limit the players macro expanding potentials. We’ve been thinking a lot about what would be a good and acceptable solution, and then the idea was born! We introduced a similar “MCV” system in Five Nations as well. Similar but not the same, because in FN the “Town hall” type buildings providing power to nearby stations. Players can build stations/structures only inside this radius. (There are some exceptions like refinery and extraction stations.)

    Step 3. The easiest and most straightforward technique of balancing: land, air (and naval) units

    When it comes to balancing, visually displaying unit movement dimensions is undoubtedly one of the silver-bullet that we could have employed (ground, air, water etc). Nevertheless, our greatest concern was that the entire game takes place in deep space and therefore it makes no sense to design land vs air, land vs land or air vs air specialist units. Instead of making “floating” space platforms where land units could have only moved we decided to make something more logical (of course nothing can be really logical in a space war but whatever...).

    We don’t want to make “hidden” or “abstract” type of abilities like units with red shield are weaker than units with green lasers...etc. Our solution was to make different unit classes with different concrete and acceptable characteristics.

    • Fighter class: small and vulnerable units which are extremely mobile (can pass through almost every obstacles) and not attackable by many units (like the air units in traditional RTS games.)
    • Corvette class: light and mobile units, but instead of the fighters they can’t pass through obstacles like asteroids and wrecks. They specialized to deal with the fighters
    • Cruiser class: specialized and armored vessels. They are usually weaker against Fighters but strong against Corvette units.
    • Battleship class: these fearsome capital ships combining an “all-big-gun” armament with protection. Although they are the dominant weapon of the Five Nations they are also expensive and slow units with lack of anti-fighter weapons.
    • Carrier class: Warships that serves as a moving spacebases, equipped with spacecraft facilities and hangars. The main role to carry the vulnerable fighters.

    units fed

     

    All right guys, this is the end of the first part of my article. I’ll continue very soon, stick around!

     

    loading_screen_withframe.jpg

    51309043_246193922965236_3376411269577627536_n.jpg

    cFV_hapter_01.jpg



      Report Article


    User Feedback


    This artwork is stunning. A strongly influenced initial attraction to the article. Has that warm fuzzy feeling we search to enjoy. If you're open to an interesting nit pick, when you mention names in the middle of step 1, I felt a interest fall off for some reason. I feel that sentence describing unit unique weapon slots in the genre can be conveyed without finger pointing. Going into the article, I had hopeful thoughts of advanced organization or fresh ideas. ...  In the middle of step 2, I'm thinking wait...StarCraft what? Ah, the lead in for step 3, the decision. It feels a little like picking up a fiction book while wanting something a little more technical.  I yield, understanding balancing is an art all in its own. Something that is hard to see when an individual does not know what it looks like. Still, I think many here would appreciate a little deeper dive into the 'why our set is better' in the final list rather than concluding with the end unit type overview and a glorious splash of color.

    Just stunning... and hopeful for part two.

    Apologies, I thing I'm having an honesty morning. 

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Thank you so much for your feedback, we'll definitely take all this into consideration when continuing with part 2. We've got a lot to learn when it comes to composing engaging articles, but we'll try to forge better ones for sure. Thank you again for your candid and constructive comment.

     

    Bests,

    Webellion Team

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Good start. It was good to note that rock-paper-scissors is just one ingredient for game balancing.

    A big unanswered question is, given the large list of variables that can be tweaked, how to actually perform unit balancing? I hope to hear more about it in your next installment.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites


    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

  • Advertisement
  • Game Developer Survey

    completed-task.png

    We are looking for qualified game developers to participate in a 10-minute online survey. Qualified participants will be offered a $15 incentive for your time and insights. Click here to start!

    Take me to the survey!

  • Advertisement
  • Latest Featured Articles

  • Featured Blogs

  • Advertisement
  • Popular Now

  • Similar Content

    • By Davicus
      Does anyone have any thoughts on how to create paths for missiles that make random curly-q type patterns before homing in on a target? 
    • By G-Dot
      Hello everyone! Recently I was doing behavior trees for enemies in my game and I've stuck with one issue. One enemy type of enemies is called Shooters (working name). So they've got a simple behaviour: pick a point near player, go to it and perform some attacks. The issue is what then they are picking point to move it happens that often they took almost equal points and I often see heaps of them in one single place. I want them to spread across arena evenly, but don't know how to do this. I think that it can be done with more advanced work with blackboards and communications. 
    • By Mutantgun
      Hi Everyone,
      Hopefully all of this makes sense at the end, but if you need anymore clarification please let me know.
      Background: My MMORPG is a sword playstyle based game, where players need to complete a dungeon at the end of each floor to be able to progress to the next. (Players can go back to lower floors / Specific floors will have specific resources needed for crafting as to give players a reason to go back / Player skill progression will also require them to do specific quests/tasks on specific floors, again giving them reason to go back)
      Inspiration: Sword Art Online (Anime) - Aincrad game that the players were stuck in
      My map progression issue is this: I'm split between having all players locked to a specific floor until they/or the party they are in, completes the dungeon, then those players unlock the next floor OR if as soon as a party clears the floors dungeon and unlocks the next floor, that floor is unlocked for everyone on the server.
      I'm going to split these into options 1 (Individual Progression) and 2 (Server Progression).
      Option 1:
      Benefits:
      Allows the more dedicated/end-game player base to progress at a faster pace. Allows for end-game guilds to form and recruit from a more end-game player pool, I.e. Players from that specific floor Allows end-game players to sell their services to help newer players to progress through the lower floors Drawbacks:
      Possibility of new players being stuck in lower floors as there might not be good enough players left on those floors to help them make a party and progress through the dungeon ? Option 2:
      Benefits:
      Allows new players to skip floor progression to be with their friends that have progressed further in the game ? Drawbacks:
      Players will be on floors where they might not be able to survive or complete solo content because of their lack of skill, items, game knowledge Complains from new players saying the content is too difficult, as they are skipping floors New/lower player base will essentially just be waiting on the end-game players to finish the new floor unlocking it for the rest of the server, basically letting them sponge off of the top players progress After typing all of this out it's starting to become more clear cut as to which option I should take, but I'd like to check with the community here as I'm sure there are other benefits/drawbacks that I'm missing that might change my view of things.
    • By Loosearmy
      Concept for Delayed Shots in a Fast Paced Shooter
       
      The base for this concept is that with each click or trigger pull there is a X-second delay before the gun would actually fire. This would make it alot more difficult to time shots and could create unique design elements that would cater to this delay. (i.e sharp corners and hallways where it would be hard to time when to click in such a tight enclosed space). Ive had this concept for a minute and i know we could code it to work but my main concern with this is, would it be a good design choice?
×

Important Information

By using GameDev.net, you agree to our community Guidelines, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.

GameDev.net is your game development community. Create an account for your GameDev Portfolio and participate in the largest developer community in the games industry.

Sign me up!