Jump to content
  • Advertisement
  • entries
  • comments
  • views

Putting the 'Developer' back into 'Developer Journ

Sign in to follow this  


Normal service has almost been resumed. I still haven't got through my backlog, but I've found it convenient to pretend it doesn't exist - if I can't see it, it isn't there [smile]

I've been spending most of my time finishing up the 'Techniques for per-pixel lighting' chapter of my book. This basically meant implementing Relief Mapping.

So far my implementation is pretty broken [lol]:

Broken implementation of 'Relief Mapping' taking an average of 14.8 seconds per frame.

But I'm pretty sure it's just down to having a vector the wrong way around or a messed up constant etc..etc..

I managed to explode the RefRast a couple of times whilst implementing Relief Mapping - lots of errors from the timeout detection routines that kill a GPU process if it hangs or takes an unreasonable amount of time. Basically that translates to my code was crap and got stuck in a loop and WDDM killed it. If WDDM kills your GPU thread it brings your entire application down - going to be interesting debugging these and seeing how many millions of threads are started about it [rolleyes]

Once I've got RM working I should have some interesting results to post:
  • Samples-per-pixel for Relief Mapping. I'm using dynamic branching so I want to implement a debug mode that outputs a counter of how many samples are taken for any given pixel.
  • Comparative timing. I've now got code that will determine the average frame time for each of the techniques used. It's only the RefRast (expect it to be seconds-per-frame rather than frames-per-second [lol]) but it could be an interesting comparison.
  • Assembly analysis. I'll be putting together a table summarising what fxc10.exe does with my HLSL - what sort of instructions and how many of them. Try to generate a code-complexity metric for the techniques discussed.

I also decided to install the Nvidia SDK and FXComposer on my Vista machine. They don't seem hugely compatible with Vista RC1 - lots of security stuff getting in their way, some hard crashes and so on...

Seems that HLSL/FX highlighting in VS'05 is broken these days so I'm hoping that FXComposer will handle SM4/FX10 files and at least allow me a slightly less notepad-like view on my code.
Sign in to follow this  


Recommended Comments

I <3 FXComposer.

Man, I'd go crazy working exclusivly with the REF device....when do you think you're going to get your hands on some DX10 hardware?

Share this comment

Link to comment
I won't be able to get D3D10 hardware before the general public - from what I've read the GeForce 8800's should be out in the next few days, so I'll probably grab one of those ASAP [smile]


Share this comment

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Advertisement

Important Information

By using GameDev.net, you agree to our community Guidelines, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.

GameDev.net is your game development community. Create an account for your GameDev Portfolio and participate in the largest developer community in the games industry.

Sign me up!