Jump to content
  • Advertisement

Ubik

Sign in to follow this  
  • entries
    101
  • comments
    122
  • views
    58245

New project

Sign in to follow this  
Will F

364 views

I've stopped working on my "engine". It was mostly for educational value, and I knew when I started that it was unlikely to get finished. All in all it was worth the time I spent on it, but i'd rather move on to actually making a game. I've got a basic app up and running (i'll try to get some screenshots posted in the near future) using the following:



I'm currently looking at physics libraries and will probably use one of the following:


I would like to use PhysX (especially now that it's free for commercial development on the PC), but as far as I can tell an end user of the game would need to download (about 20 megs) and install the Aegia system software to be able to run the game - which might be more trouble than it's worth. Right now i'm leaning towards Newton, but I would be a lot happier if it was either open source or the developer promised to release it under a BSD style license if development/support on it stopped.

I need to do some research into what I want to use for sound and possibly networking (initially i'll probably just be doing some small single player games and won't need it). I also need to figure out what type of game I want to be working on, right now i'm leaning in the direction of something like Super Monkey Ball - if only because it seems like a realistic goal.

As for actual gaming, i'm still slowly working my way through Okami (i've spent about 50 hours on it so far), I really like that game. I'm also playing Metal Gear Solid 3: Subsistence, and enjoying it a lot more than I thought I would.
Sign in to follow this  


2 Comments


Recommended Comments

I've ditched using PhysX for exactly the same reason. I recently went through most of those physics engines, and by far the easiest that I found to integrate was TrueAxis. I haven't had a chance to get a simulation up and running, but the demo's look good. Licensing might be a problem: free for non-commercial use; $100USD for indie low-income games, and $5000AUD for commercial.

Share this comment


Link to comment
Thanks for the link, i'll take a look at it. Right now i'm not necessarily going to be making a commercial product, but if I do the $100 for an indie license seems reasonable. Though I suspect i'll end up going with something completely free, unless in the evaluation it has some features that I can't live without.

It's a shame about the PhysX system software, but from a business perspective I can understand why Ageia did it. Regardless it's awesome that you can know use it for free with commercial games on the PC. If I was working with a game that I knew would be more than a 100 meg download (so that the additional 20 megs wouldn't be as much of a factor) or was being distributed on a DVD, I would probably be using it.

Share this comment


Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Advertisement
×

Important Information

By using GameDev.net, you agree to our community Guidelines, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.

Participate in the game development conversation and more when you create an account on GameDev.net!

Sign me up!