• entries
    422
  • comments
    1540
  • views
    488553

grumble

Sign in to follow this  
jollyjeffers

162 views

Last time I was dealing with lighting models I still had access to a university library which meant I could get all the conference proceedings and publications for free.

Now that I don't have that luxury I've just had to cough up $29 to buy two papers (Oren-Nayar and Strauss). Not exactly big money, but I'm a tad annoyed that the quality of the Strauss paper is almost useless [headshake]

As with all papers they have images/photos illustrating results - but these aren't much good when the scan/photocopy makes them entirely black. They oughta sack the monkey that they've got doing paperwork in the basement.
Sign in to follow this  


2 Comments


Recommended Comments

I can't agree with you more regarding the Strauss paper - the images are next to useless. I can't say I got particularly good results with the algo either, but I didn't try it out for very long and the people at Futuremark seem to do a good job with it :). I'll have to go back and experiment some more.

Looking forward to reading your stuff BTW :).

stoo

Share this comment


Link to comment
I wonder what the original quality of the images was like - they can't of been amazing if they scanned so badly. Then again, the scanning does appear to be a very limited greyscale of 4 or so colours...

Quote:
Looking forward to reading your stuff BTW
Excellent, that's what I like to here [grin]

Cheers,
Jack

Share this comment


Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now