Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
  • entries
    292
  • comments
    557
  • views
    154338

Struck v Stricken, Part II

Sign in to follow this  
TANSTAAFL

87 views

The conclusion thus far:

If it is some sort of disease or malady, we use "stricken", but otherwise we use "struck" for the past participle of "to strike".

Compare:

"She has been stricken by cancer."

"She has been struck by cancer."

I note that the "struck by cancer" sounds ok.

However, here's an example of stricken that doesn't seem to follow that rule.

In court:

"I move to have that stricken from the record."

Is this a leftover from a time when stricken was properly the past participle of "to strike"?
Sign in to follow this  


0 Comments


Recommended Comments

There are no comments to display.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Advertisement
×

Important Information

By using GameDev.net, you agree to our community Guidelines, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.

We are the game development community.

Whether you are an indie, hobbyist, AAA developer, or just trying to learn, GameDev.net is the place for you to learn, share, and connect with the games industry. Learn more About Us or sign up!

Sign me up!