Jump to content
  • Advertisement
Sign in to follow this  
  • entries
  • comments
  • views

Struck v Stricken, Part II

Sign in to follow this  


The conclusion thus far:

If it is some sort of disease or malady, we use "stricken", but otherwise we use "struck" for the past participle of "to strike".


"She has been stricken by cancer."

"She has been struck by cancer."

I note that the "struck by cancer" sounds ok.

However, here's an example of stricken that doesn't seem to follow that rule.

In court:

"I move to have that stricken from the record."

Is this a leftover from a time when stricken was properly the past participle of "to strike"?
Sign in to follow this  


Recommended Comments

There are no comments to display.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Advertisement

Important Information

By using GameDev.net, you agree to our community Guidelines, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.

GameDev.net is your game development community. Create an account for your GameDev Portfolio and participate in the largest developer community in the games industry.

Sign me up!