• Advertisement
Sign in to follow this  
  • entries
    292
  • comments
    557
  • views
    153864

Struck v Stricken, Part II

Sign in to follow this  

80 views

The conclusion thus far:

If it is some sort of disease or malady, we use "stricken", but otherwise we use "struck" for the past participle of "to strike".

Compare:

"She has been stricken by cancer."

"She has been struck by cancer."

I note that the "struck by cancer" sounds ok.

However, here's an example of stricken that doesn't seem to follow that rule.

In court:

"I move to have that stricken from the record."

Is this a leftover from a time when stricken was properly the past participle of "to strike"?
Sign in to follow this  


0 Comments


Recommended Comments

There are no comments to display.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Advertisement