Jump to content
  • Advertisement
  • entries
  • comments
  • views

RC-5, NEC, JVC and Panasonic infrared codes

Sign in to follow this  


I've rewritten the remote control signal decoding software to handle multiple protocols. As well as SIRCS, it now supports RC-5, NEC, JVC and two Panasonic codes (one "old" 11-bit code and one "new" 48-bit code). There's not much in the way of screenshots at the moment, other than a debug window that gets filled when keys are pressed:
NecCommand Address=27526, Command=5, Extended=True, Repeat=1
NecCommand Address=24, Command=87, Extended=False, Repeat=1
RC5Command Address=20, Command=53, Repeat=True, Repeat=1
NewPanasonicCommand OEM Device 1=2, OEM Device 2=32, Device=144, Sub-Device=0, Command=10, Repeat=1
RC5Command Address=8, Command=35, Repeat=True, Repeat=1
OldPanasonicCommand Address=0, Command=20, Repeat=1
SircsCommand Address=2362, Command=121, Length=20, Repeat=1
SircsCommand Address=7002, Command=84, Length=20, Repeat=1
NecCommand Address=64, Command=146, Extended=False, Repeat=1
NecCommand Address=81, Command=8, Extended=False, Repeat=1
JvcCommand Address=3, Command=23, Repeat=1
Gripping stuff, I'm sure you'll agree.

The C# source code for this can be downloaded here.

A keyring remote control (courtesy of Poundland) has highlighted one possible issue in handling repeating buttons. Rather than target any particular device, it will try and brute-force a response. For example, here's the result of pressing the power button once in one particular mode:
SircsCommand Address=1, Command=21, Length=12, Repeat=1
SircsCommand Address=1, Command=21, Length=12, Repeat=2
OldPanasonicCommand Address=0, Command=32, Repeat=1
NecCommand Address=32, Command=11, Extended=False, Repeat=1
NewPanasonicCommand OEM Device 1=2, OEM Device 2=32, Device=128, Sub-Device=0, Command=61, Repeat=1

That's four different protocols from one button. I suppose some sort of mapping from protocol-specific code to a string (so those five commands would be translated into five "power" strings) and comparing the time between signals to turn the input into something meaningful may help, but that would require an enormous database of known codes.
Sign in to follow this  


Recommended Comments

There are no comments to display.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Advertisement

Important Information

By using GameDev.net, you agree to our community Guidelines, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.

We are the game development community.

Whether you are an indie, hobbyist, AAA developer, or just trying to learn, GameDev.net is the place for you to learn, share, and connect with the games industry. Learn more About Us or sign up!

Sign me up!