Jump to content
  • Advertisement
  • entries
  • comments
  • views

Learning HLSL, and D3DX updates too often

Sign in to follow this  


If you want to learn HLSL, I highly recommend ShaderX2: Intro & Tutorials, specifically the article "Introduction to the DirectX High Level Shading Language". The book, along with a couple of the other ShaderX books, has been made available for free over at http://tog.acm.org/resources/shaderx/ so you don't even need to purchase it! You can also find that specific article on the MSDN at http://msdn.microsof...y/ms810449.aspx.

I plan on avoiding D3DX in future projects. There are of course the overhead and inflexibility concerns, but my main motivation is the fact that it gets updated much more frequently than DirectX. Now, this isn't a bad thing if you are releasing a final product with an installer and everything, since you can package in the DirectX updater, but it is a real pain to deal with if you are just releasing demos. The demos are usually packed up into a .zip file without an installer, which makes things easier on both the user and myself. The problem I have encountered is that most users do not keep their copy of D3DX up-to-date, while I usually have the latest version. This requires the user to install the update, either by downloading a separate "dependencies" file along with the demo or getting the update directly from Microsoft. A lot of people don't want to bother doing that.

I only use D3DX for creating textures, so avoiding it won't be that problematic overall. However, I will need to brush up on my bitmap format knowledge and figure out how to use libpng.

Today marks the last day of the "knowledge" phase of the R&D I am doing. I will be entering the "experience" phase tomorrow, which involves actually using the information I learned. The point of the "experience" phase is to get me more comfortable with the new techniques, and iron out the first big wave of unforeseen problems which inevitably rise up when doing something for the first time. On a side-note, I suppose calling these the "research" and "development" phases respectively would be more fitting, but I like the more general feel of the other set of names.

[size="1"]Reposted from http://invisiblegdev.blogspot.com/
Sign in to follow this  


Recommended Comments

Don't quote me on this, but I [i]believe[/i] it is legal to ship a demo with a copy of the relevant D3DX dll just sitting in the program's exe directory, which will be checked when Windows attempts to link at runtime.

Obviously this is not good for a finished product as the dll will not benefit from future updates, but it is fine for one-off demos and means that you just add another file to your zip.

Share this comment

Link to comment
No, it's not legal. Can't find link to MSDN site with exact text, but here's same text: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/265376/directx-redistributable-package-breakdown

Share this comment

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Advertisement

Important Information

By using GameDev.net, you agree to our community Guidelines, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.

GameDev.net is your game development community. Create an account for your GameDev Portfolio and participate in the largest developer community in the games industry.

Sign me up!