Jump to content
  • entries
  • comments
  • views

Indie by Default - Part II

Sign in to follow this  


The new era of indie games

I remember a time about as eight years ago when I was first researching the game industry. The general consensus at that time was that the days of the small "garage" team game developer was over. Games now cost millions of dollars to produce and thousands of man hours. Furthermore, specialization was the norm. Not only were their designers, programmers and artists, but also specialists inside of each of those fields. The conclusion: making a game on your own or with a few talented friends was no longer an option.

Fortunately, the indie game developers weren't listening.

Now, more than ever, the environment and technology are open and supportive to small, independent games. An abundance of tools have cropped up that target the small indie studio. Torque, Unity, XNA, and PlayFirst are just a few examples of low cost or free game engines. Just as important are the avenues of distribution that have opened up. Services such as Steam, XBox Live Arcade, Kongregate, and many other services have come up that directly focus on smaller games. Finally, there are new platforms that make sense for the indie game including the PC, web, Facebook, iPhone, and Windows Mobile. The point is that the barriers of entry are now lower than ever.

I'm not saying that it's easy. In fact, the competition is overwhelming on all of the promising platforms I named above. But there is one thing to keep in mind: Three years ago, few people took game development on the iPhone seriously. Now it is one of the most prolific platforms for games. The same is true of Facebook. If these examples are indicative--and they seem to be--there is a huge market for the more "casual" games that indie studios are best at.

Focus testing

No, I'm not talking about getting a bunch of kids in a room to play your next game. I'm talking about the need to focus or you'll never get anything done! There are so many variables to consider when first starting an independent game that it can be overwhelming.

Once I had decided that I was going to get serious about making my own game, I was immediately lost in the details. What kind of game did I want to create? Which platform and language should I use? Should I use a game engine or should I just start from scratch?

Decisions, decisions, decisions.

Ultimately I used two criteria to make these choices: experience and resources.

I asked myself, "What programming platform do you have the most experience with?" Although I am fluent in C++, I also did a great deal of development in Visual Basic and C# in my previous business. I had a lot of experience in .NET web development as well. Knowing that anything done in C++ doubled or tripled development time, I decided to use on C#. I also decided to use the web because I could leverage my existing knowledge of ASP.Net development. This would allow me to target the web as well as Facebook with my game.

I realize the C# and .NET aren't the most common tools to use for game programming, but this leads to the second criteria: resources. In the beginning, I knew the only resource that I had was me, so I chose the platform that would allow me to produce meaningful results in a reasonable amount of time.

I also knew that my greatest limitation was art. I am no artist! So, when it came to picking a game design, I chose a type of game that was not art intensive. I needed a game where even I could supply the art if needed, and hopefully I could get a real artist involved at some point in the future.

So, there's my focus: a web based game--written in C# and ASP.Net--that doesn't need a lot of art. Having this focus is what allowed me to move forward. My advice: moving forward is always better than not moving!
Sign in to follow this  


Recommended Comments

Nice read [img]http://public.gamedev.net/public/style_emoticons/default/cool.gif[/img]

Share this comment

Link to comment
Steam levels the playing field. As long as your game is fun, well marketed, and nearly bug less you will out compete others. Online distribution blows away the need for a publisher. So as long as you can deliver the current need for the market you're set.

Share this comment

Link to comment
making a blog does not count as indie just saying. Put some sh*t out there and get your dime.

Share this comment

Link to comment
I've got the same problem with art. Even if I try to do something, I throw it away because I always fall into depression :-/

Share this comment

Link to comment
You make some good points. I agree that focusing your efforts in the areas you can do best helps to refine what you should be doing.

C# can really reduce development time compared to C++ for an indie. Sure it has some downsides, but I'm surprised it's not more commonly used for indie game development. It's got a lot more potential than people give it credit.

Why do game engines often have a scripting language like Lua sitting on top of them? Often it's to reduce the long build times that come with C++. Using C# provides a similar benefit and the overhead is probably better in most cases.

Anyway.. good luck with it :)

Share this comment

Link to comment
Thanks for all the great comments. Sorry I didn't respond to you all sooner! Good points all around.

Share this comment

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Advertisement

Important Information

By using GameDev.net, you agree to our community Guidelines, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.

We are the game development community.

Whether you are an indie, hobbyist, AAA developer, or just trying to learn, GameDev.net is the place for you to learn, share, and connect with the games industry. Learn more About Us or sign up!

Sign me up!