• Announcements

    • khawk

      Download the Game Design and Indie Game Marketing Freebook   07/19/17

      GameDev.net and CRC Press have teamed up to bring a free ebook of content curated from top titles published by CRC Press. The freebook, Practices of Game Design & Indie Game Marketing, includes chapters from The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, and An Architectural Approach to Level Design. The GameDev.net FreeBook is relevant to game designers, developers, and those interested in learning more about the challenges in game development. We know game development can be a tough discipline and business, so we picked several chapters from CRC Press titles that we thought would be of interest to you, the GameDev.net audience, in your journey to design, develop, and market your next game. The free ebook is available through CRC Press by clicking here. The Curated Books The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, Second Edition, by Jesse Schell Presents 100+ sets of questions, or different lenses, for viewing a game’s design, encompassing diverse fields such as psychology, architecture, music, film, software engineering, theme park design, mathematics, anthropology, and more. Written by one of the world's top game designers, this book describes the deepest and most fundamental principles of game design, demonstrating how tactics used in board, card, and athletic games also work in video games. It provides practical instruction on creating world-class games that will be played again and again. View it here. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, by Joel Dreskin Marketing is an essential but too frequently overlooked or minimized component of the release plan for indie games. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing provides you with the tools needed to build visibility and sell your indie games. With special focus on those developers with small budgets and limited staff and resources, this book is packed with tangible recommendations and techniques that you can put to use immediately. As a seasoned professional of the indie game arena, author Joel Dreskin gives you insight into practical, real-world experiences of marketing numerous successful games and also provides stories of the failures. View it here. An Architectural Approach to Level Design This is one of the first books to integrate architectural and spatial design theory with the field of level design. The book presents architectural techniques and theories for level designers to use in their own work. It connects architecture and level design in different ways that address the practical elements of how designers construct space and the experiential elements of how and why humans interact with this space. Throughout the text, readers learn skills for spatial layout, evoking emotion through gamespaces, and creating better levels through architectural theory. View it here. Learn more and download the ebook by clicking here. Did you know? GameDev.net and CRC Press also recently teamed up to bring GDNet+ Members up to a 20% discount on all CRC Press books. Learn more about this and other benefits here.
  • entries
  • comments
  • views

Man of Steel, Le Bad Cinema

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0


Just saw Man of Steel.

It was a major disappointment for me.

Bad plot, bad story, bad writing, bad presentation.

To be fair, some of it is just Superman. Declaring patriotism with a flag waving in the background, I can live with that. Classic Superman.

Giving yourself up to potential death for the good of humanity, while standing in a church sharing the screen with a stained-glass image of Christ giving himself up for humanity... Very tacky. But it's Superman, so I guess I can live with that. Tacky, but still comic book.

It is a superhero movie so we get superhero physics. Catching someone falling from a fatal height without slowing them down first (they might as well just hit the concrete), okay, they are super heros. Flying around the world in a matter of seconds without burning up from compression off the atmosphere? Well, comic book Superman could do some of that if he tried really hard. So does Santa, I suppose. So we can tolerate it.

The computer graphics were both good and awful. The exploding cars look just like I imagine an exploding car should look. But things thrown by the Supers don't obey simple physics. Supers picking up full-ton vehicles, instantly accelerating to supersonic speed, smashing them into a building and only doing minimal damage? Yeah, that's not very believable. The Krypton scenes were pretty for still motion images, but ugly in motion. Not falling fast enough? Will yourself to fall faster! The models and artwork were usually good, but the animation of those graphics was terrible. Then the exploding planet, "We're zoomed in, everything moves at human movement speeds; we're zoomed out to the planet size, it engulfs the entire planet in seconds; were zoomed in again, slow it back down". Wrong physics to be realistic, wrong physics for comic book, so just plain wrong.

Then they went with the "everything explodes" method of action. Cars crash? Explosion (and bad news for auto body shops, good news for dealerships). Fistfight at a gas station? Explosion. (Note to self, never fill up my fuel tank again, too dangerous.) Superhero/villain looks at a building? Bricks and cinder blocks somehow explode. UFO flying out of a glacier? Explosions. That's right, the ice explodes in a collection of fireballs.

They went with the same "Michael Bay" style on locations. Remember Transformers? "We are out here in the desert at a wonderful military site, great visibility, lots of weapons, no civilians, and the enemy is seeking us out. Let's leave this great site and go to a city where the enemy can ambush us an kill millions of civilians while doing billions in property damage." Much the same. "We can fly and we can choose our battleground, so let's have it right in the center of a city of skyscrapers to destroy and to encourage millions of pointless deaths, rather than drawing them out over the neighboring ocean."

Then there is the writing of the people watching the fight. "This is the Daily Planet, world's largest news organization. A fight among aliens that will decide the fate of Earth is happening right outside our window. This is a news agency, so everybody sit at your desks, do not look out the window, do not take photos, and do not otherwise report on the globally significant news visible outside the window."

And the writing of the CONSTANT fights themselves. It was pervasive, so I don't know to blame the writers, directors, or both. The bad guys are supposed to be extremely intelligent; the apex of a race , and genetically engineered to be masterminds of warfare. Yet they are stupid. "We have weapons that can destroy a planet from orbit, but let's not use them, and instead go down in person. We have a group of skilled warriors with guns that can vaporize people (including Supers) instantly. Let's not use them, not use our snipers and get a headshot. Instead, let's drop of just two of our soldiers and engage in hand-to-hand combat. And not stick around to make sure they win." Bad writing, but the director followed it so bad directing too.

Let's compare the old, real Superman character vs this movie.

When Superman has a fight in a train yard, it is because he wants to SAVE the trains, not throw them as projectiles. When Superman has a fight outside a gas station he not only saves the building from destruction but also buys a slurpee on his way through. When Superman fights in the city, he always stops the bad guys, prevents the destruction of buildings, and never causes collateral damage. In this movie he was responsible for untold billions in property damage. In the movie, hhis own actions destroyed probably 15 skyscrapers full of people, and he did nothing to save any buildings from damage. That isn't the Superman of the comics. The Superman of the comics would find a way to protect the buildings and save the lives.

The real movie takes place between the explosions. It could be reduced to about 30 minutes. That part was mediocre. The love story wasn't there, apart from "he looks hot", but Superman is supposed to be all about a yes-but-no romance between Clark and Lois. Again, this was not Superman.

I could keep going on about it, but it doesn't help.

It is bad cinema. I recommend avoiding it unless you are a die-hard Superman fan, but in that case you have probably seen it already.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0


* Alert - Spoilers from multiple movies *

When I saw Superman with my wife, she was laughing throughout the film because she thought it was too silly. I would always say, "it's Superman." It's not supposed to make sense. I agree, that church scene was way over the top and should not have made it through editing. Then again, that whole begining scenes on Krypton should have been cut in half. It was almost like watching 2 different movies. The fight at the end was too long and they wrecked Metropolis. I guess they had to do something in that city.

This movie wasn't as bad as Iron man 3, which could have ended after 45 minutes if he had just called his army of backup suits at the beginning instead of waiting till the end. There really weren't any reasons for carrying around the broken suit and trying to fix it.

I can't wait until the "How it should have Ended" comes out on Youtube.

Alas, Star Trek for me has been the best movie this year.

Share this comment

Link to comment


which could have ended after 45 minutes if he had just called his army of backup suits at the beginning instead of waiting till the end.


They were stuck in his basement after they blew up his house. They only got it open just at the end. They could have just written it to be uncovered faster, but that was the logic of it.


Share this comment

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now