Jump to content
  • Advertisement
Sign in to follow this  
  • entries
    10
  • comments
    20
  • views
    9294

Day 1 - Immagonna Participate This Year?

Sign in to follow this  
Orymus3

741 views

Full disclosure here: I wasn't going to participate this year...
Timing was horrible for me, both professionally and personally.
As a matter of fact, I was approached to take jury duty this time around, and even declined doing so based off my expectations of where I'd be by the time of the competition.
And then, sometimes, Murphy leaves you alone for a bit...

Long story short, I was curious this morning when I realized the competition had just started, and I found myself with a 'bit of time on my hands'.
Wasn't too sure exactly how I'd use that time just yet, so figured I'd give the themes a look and see whether they'd inspire me.

Now creativity is a fickle mistress, and I can distinctly remember the Week of Awesome III's theme didn't speak much to me and was hard to build around. I had forgotten the branching themes and was happily surprised to see options!

Shadows... Undeads... Evolution... Ruins...

If you know me at all, you know I'm afraid of the blank page syndrome. I'm also a firm believer in the 'more constraints leads to more creativity' motto.
Faced with many options, I ultimately chose to take this as a challenge: find one unifying game concept that would embody all four themes.
Yes, that's right, I'm running for Shadows+Undeads+Evolution+Ruins this year.

Unlike other years, I almost instantly found the concept I wanted to make. Truth be told, they're not all that far apart to begin with, but I like how each of them pulls my mind in a different direction.
While 'daydreaming' at work, I settled for my game concept and let it flow...

After taking care of family in the evening, I sat down for a bit and started to draw.
If you know me at all, or if you've seen either of my previous entries, you know I'm anything BUT an artist...
Luckily enough, it seems like this time around we may ask for help, so depending on where things stand, I might just ask for some help by mid-week to polish my prog-art visual!

After a bit, I started using what I had and created a new Unity project. The last couple of years using Unity sure started paying off. After a false start where I was really trying to over-engineer / do code that's much too clean to stand a chance in a gamejam environment, I went back to simple solutions and made some significant progress. What I have now is anything but playable, but looking at the missing components, I'm starting to feel like I'll be able to pull this off within the time allotted. I still have a few features that I'm unclear will fit the time I can contribute to this project, and at least one of them is an absolute must for this game to make any sense, but I'd say that the level of risk is still minimal.

Note to self: don't forget to keep a day for UI an flow... you can't half-ass this!

Without revealing too much about the game concept, here's what I ended up doing today:

1h Art
- (1) Placeholder Player Character
- (1) Placeholder GPI (with 6 light variations)
- (1) Placeholder collectible
- (1) Very placeholder game background
- (1) Somewhat placeholder enemy

2h Development
- Camera: very minimal changes to the default Unity camera. I had originally intended on going 3/4 with 2D sprites cast as textures in a 3D world, but though I'm getting a hang of this scheme, I didn't get around to implementing this as I felt I wouldn't have much time to contribute to this entry and wanted to focus on the core gameplay instead.

- Controls: simplistic player controls (movement, action) and basic interactions.

- Character: still 'static', but it responds to controls appropriately (still requires a lot of fine tuning / polish)

- GPI: Placeholder GPI that responds to input (by destroying itself...)

- Enemy: Placeholder Enemy with basic AI (which also destroys itself...)

- Collectible: Placeholder collectible with simple effect (which ultimately destroys itself as well... but it gives you something in return!)


Things I want to look into tomorrow:
- Evolution mechanic (tsk tsk tsk!) First Pass
- 'Combat' mechanic (oh oh oh!) First Pass
- Placeholder UI / Scene Flow (better now than 24h from completion)
- Basic sounds (just to make sure I have something in case I can't contribute more)
- Possibly make an asset request

Best of luck to all contestants, and hopefully everyone has fun and learns!
(I'll leave the 'why I chose to participate', etc. for the end of the competition)

Sign in to follow this  


5 Comments


Recommended Comments

Ah, I'm glad to see that you've entered! ^_^

 

Hmm... I'm intrigued, especially since you're aiming to incorporate all four themes! (You might want to check whether you're expected to indicate which two you want to be scored on--I seem to recall from the administration thread that only two count.)

 

You're working pretty quickly, based on the progress-list that you've given--it's somewhat impressive!

 

What is "GPI", by the way?

Share this comment


Link to comment

Thanks Thaumaturge, I indeed need to give these rules a thorough read (since I hadn't considered joining earlier, I gave it a pass, and it seems there's much I need to look into).

I might actually do poorly along one of the 4 themes, so best if I can specifically target the ones that are stronger within the concept. I'll have a look and see how this should be communicated.

 

I wouldn't say quickly, because it's not yet playable, and my target was to have something playable on Day1, but considering how late and unprepared I was, I guess it makes sense.

Revisiting the scope also worries me a bit more, there's a lot more I'd like to do than is likely to fit and I may struggle with feature creep by the end. Hopefully the things I pick are the ones that make the most sense.

 

GPI is a technical term for 'Gameplay Ingredients', that is, the components in a level that you can interact with. For example, an infamous box (or 'push-pull') is a GPI. It's one easy catch-em-all kind of term to refer to these 'GameObjects' that excludes elements such as enemies (which have an AI and a will) and player characters. Note that the line is sometimes blurry (a spiked block that goes back and forth does have some kind of simplistic AI, but still feels like a GPI, so let's not be philosophical about it).

Share this comment


Link to comment

Feature creep can, I fear, be a somewhat insidious danger--especially under a time constraint such as that of this competition. :/

 

GPI is a technical term for 'Gameplay Ingredients' ...

 

Ahh, interesting--I don't recall having come across this term before. Thank you for clarifying. ^_^

Share this comment


Link to comment

Feature creep can, I fear, be a somewhat insidious danger--especially under a time constraint such as that of this competition. :/

 

 

 

GPI is a technical term for 'Gameplay Ingredients' ...

 

Ahh, interesting--I don't recall having come across this term before. Thank you for clarifying. ^_^

Could be that it is primarily used 'inside' of the industry, and only by a select few groups. I believe Ubisoft coined the term, but I've heard it used by various other studios. I stuck with it because I don't think there is any other elegant term for that precise category of objects (GameObjects would fit, but Unity kinda took that, and it would introduce confusion).

Share this comment


Link to comment

Could be that it is primarily used 'inside' of the industry, and only by a select few groups. I believe Ubisoft coined the term, but I've heard it used by various other studios. I stuck with it because I don't think there is any other elegant term for that precise category of objects (GameObjects would fit, but Unity kinda took that, and it would introduce confusion).

Aah, fair enough. Interesting!

 

... Thinking about it, I suppose that I might use the term "active objects", or something similar, myself.

 

You mention Unity employing that term "GameObject": in the code of my own games, I usually create a base-class by that name, and I have had some exposure to that engine, so I wonder whether I got the name from there, even if I don't recall that being the case. (That said, my "GameObject" class isn't necessarily an ancestor of all "Gameplay Ingredients" in my game; it more usually refers to "things within the level", and so may not be related to gameplay elements outside of the levels, such as those in minigames.)

 

(For what it's worth, I have been--somewhat--"inside" the industry, but that was at a small local company. I don't recall the word being used there, but that's a very limited sample.)

Share this comment


Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Advertisement
×

Important Information

By using GameDev.net, you agree to our community Guidelines, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.

We are the game development community.

Whether you are an indie, hobbyist, AAA developer, or just trying to learn, GameDev.net is the place for you to learn, share, and connect with the games industry. Learn more About Us or sign up!

Sign me up!