Jump to content
Site Stability Read more... ×
  • Advertisement
Sign in to follow this  
  • entries
  • comments
  • views

The playing monkeys.

Sign in to follow this  
Fredi C


[font='times new roman']Here we have a hundred monkeys for a reasonable infinite amount of time, and we are going to make them play chess, tournament. But, we are going to do so by setting up two parallel tournaments. [/font]

[font='times new roman']- Tournament A is played on a physical set, with a wooden board and pieces. Physical. [/font]

[font='times new roman']- Tournament B, where the board and pieces are displayed on a big tactile screen. Digital. [/font]

[font='times new roman']We accept, for argument sake, that the monkeys will not be jumping around. We will assume that our monkeys will move pieces from one square to another and that they do not know the rules of chess. Like in Emile Borel's typewriter monkey thought experiment, just as a metaphor for random sequences, the one that says that; a monkey with an infinite amount of time will type the entire works of Shakespeare. [/font]

[font='times new roman']A monkey in chess tournament B makes an invalid move, to move a pawn horizontally. The digital game does not allow this move, returns the pawn to his original square and waits until the player, the monkey, introduces a valid move. This will happen each time a movement is made that does not match the rules of chess. Therefore these B monkeys can only play valid games. Off course, without any strategical thinking process, lacking of meaning and poetic value beauty. Full of tactical abominations, but valid games nevertheless.[/font]

[font='times new roman']There is a big difference about how tournament A deal with invalid moves and the way B does. [/font]

[font='times new roman']It is due to a strange interactive relation that digital games have with its players. That is precisely the point of introducing the monkeys metaphor, is to illustrate the situation, where in digital games, regardless if the players know the rules or not are forced to play by them. [/font]

[font='times new roman']We have greater chances to find an interesting game played by monkeys digitally rather than played with the physical set. If it was up to us to decide which tournament air in the national TV, and we care about our audience and the game, we should air the digital games, because at least every single one of them will be played according to the rules. [/font]

[font='times new roman']We see that programming make the matches played at tournament A and those at tournament B clearly different, as digital players are forced to play by the rules by the software. [/font]

[font='times new roman']Authority had become decentralized. While in tournament A a judge must be present and play, every second being monkeys, an active role. In torunament B the rules are enforced by the code itself. [/font]

Sign in to follow this  


Recommended Comments

There are no comments to display.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Advertisement

Important Information

By using GameDev.net, you agree to our community Guidelines, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.

GameDev.net is your game development community. Create an account for your GameDev Portfolio and participate in the largest developer community in the games industry.

Sign me up!