Jump to content
  • entries
  • comments
  • views

Week 3 - Incoming Giants & Problems



After a week of development and testing, we are now close to the 0.4 update, Gentle Giants.

Firstly, we would like to address the issue on tower progression. We received the comments from players about the lack of depth in tower aspect. We are trying to modify this tower system into something fun for tower defense fans. Currently, our approach is limited to upgrading the tower through the spirit orb system, where you collect spirit orb and level them up. This upgrade system will not be the final form of the game and a lot of more to come.

Over the weekend, we have discussed with our team and planned out the road map of our development. There are a few things we would like to have in the game. 

1) Monster pack encounters to increase the depth of gameplay. Currently, the different stages of our game do not vary much. Therefore players will fight against the same monsters over and over again from map 1 to map 4; we know this is boring! Therefore, we will introduce monster packs, which contains specific monster army, such Abaddon army, Moloch army, or a mix of both, to challenge player’s defense. We hope this will bring more variation. At the same time, we will also introduce armor, magic defense, armor & magic penetration to different monsters and equipment. This encounter system will increase the depth and allows players to react to these monster packs, whether stack up armor or magic penetration units.

2) Quests, missions and Hell Warders Rank to increase the incentive of progressing. What we see in the game is that players do not have an incentive to proceed further apart from just the fun from the battle; therefore we are introducing quests and missions. These quests and missions have rewards that give hero equipment, companion equipment, cosmetics, and ranking. We would like to introduce a “Hell Warders” ranking system, which you proceed further, you will get more challenging quests and missions to challenge players, at the same time, having better rewards!

3) Tower spellbook to reduce the tedious of picking up spirit orb. One of the unique points in Hell Warders is the picking up of spirit orb without the resource management system. Numerous players commented on the spirit orb system being tedious; therefore we are thinking of scrapping the spirit orb - tower picking system. Removal of spirit orb does not mean we are throwing it away, but looking whether battle upgrade (double damage, movement speed) spirit orb instead of a defensive unit, which might be more suitable for players. The player can choose to leave the battle, pick spirit orbs, then go back to fight.

4) The inventory system is vital to hero progression. Currently, the game only has a simple perk system which does not provide a sufficient RPG element in the game. We will be introducing cosmetic & equipment in the future. These items will affect how strong a player will be, but not a random "stats" rolling drop. 

In conclusion, we have identified a few areas that we should work on to increase the depth of gameplay. We will also continue to modify these changes to balance out the game and introduce more features to make Hell Warders a better game.


Recommended Comments

There are no comments to display.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Advertisement
  • Advertisement
  • Blog Entries

  • Similar Content

    • By Rio Lloyd
      Hey all!
      we are a team of 3 looking for more members, 
      we are making an isometrical Survival RPG.
      we are looking For Members who can make low poly 3D artists who can do character models, environments, tools and more.
      if interested and want to know more email me at rioishere14@gmail.com
    • By Adeilton Alves
      Hello everyone, I'm new here and sorry if this isn't the right place to ask but i asked in a few forums around the internet and no one yet help with it.. I'm have been trying to mod this game for years, but I still stuck with the raw files from RACJIN games, 
      Raw Files [ Mod edit: Removed ]
      I would like to identify the compression algorithm used to compress these files so that they can be decompressed and analyzed.

      Game : Naruto Uzumaki Chronicles 2... A.K.A Naruto Konoha Spirits in Japan.
    • By Anri
      I'm working on a small arcade-style Android game for phones and tablets( using Android Studio and Java ) and I'm not 100% satisfied with the touch screen controls.  The game has five buttons for control;  left and right, and three buttons for firing three different bullet types( essential to the main mechanic of the game itself ).
      The irony is that they respond very well even with scaling on different devices and the coding is bullet-proof( zero crashes or bugs since extensive testing ),  but as the game is as fast paced as Space Invaders or Columns it kinda falls apart as I switch between pressing buttons in the heat of the action.  I am now at the point where I'm having to slow the game down to make it easier to cope with the touch-screen buttons, or adopt a harsh attitude that the player will need an Android-compatible gamepad for the best possible experience...
      Quality controls with standard input is something I take very seriously, but in this case I feel action games are not suited for tablets without a gamepad.  Would this be a correct assumption or could I do better?
      Any thoughts would be most welcome - even if you are just a gamer.
    • By nxrighthere
      BenchmarkNet is a console application for testing the reliable UDP networking solutions.
      Asynchronous simulation of a large number of clients Stable under high loads Simple and flexible simulation setup Detailed session information Multi-process instances Supported networking libraries:
      ENet UNet LiteNetLib Lidgren MiniUDP Hazel Photon Neutrino DarkRift More information and source code on GitHub.
      You can find the latest benchmark results on the wiki page.
    • By ggenije
      Important: I am trying to realize in scrtach which is performance very low due to it's "virutal level" scrtach->flashplayer->java...
      Also i'm new to this forum so i'm sorry if I missed group (like last time)
      Like a title is saying:
      I have project ,and I get negative feedback on it because some people need 30 min to complete it (what is the planned time)
      but problem is that some people need EVEN 5 hours…(game is incremental/idle/upgrade type so it's important to keep same time ...)
      Of course people with slower computer will have less fps so game will be slower for them,
      so I have created TimeDelta system for each frame to calculate something to do per second
      for example
        Update(){move(TimeDelta*speed)}  so that mean it will be moving speed number of pixels(or units) per second so it will be same for almost each user.

      But problem is next:
      I have to change ySpeed by jumpPower (#PlayerJump in my project)
      when any jump button is pressed
      then in each frame decrease ySpeed by gravity it is(-10 * TimeDelta)
      but when someone have lower fps it will have higher TimeDelta and will fall faster but with same jump it turns out to jump significantly lower that changes core of game
      BUT even worse if fps suddenly in moment of jump then timeDelta would be 1 so player will jump much much MUCH higher , then fall much slower because timeDelta changed in meanwhile…(and the point of my game is about upgrading jump not complete game in first fps drop)


      Then I got an idea to fix TimeDelta (like in unity for rigibody) so it will be rounded like
      if calculated TimeDelta is 0.01834 it will be 0.02 fixed
      if weaker computer is using it the TImeDelta will be 0.143 so runded to 0.14 and so on…

      I did not manage to realize it… i tried to calculate it before main initialization of game objects
      but I'm afraid to fps will drop in moment that is calculating so it will be much diffirent…
      I was trying with empty loop(400)(in scrtach even this is taking time) to calculate it but i'm not sure is it right

      So is there good way to realize this fixed TimeDelta
      I only have timer function to use and time difference between frames

Important Information

By using GameDev.net, you agree to our community Guidelines, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.

We are the game development community.

Whether you are an indie, hobbyist, AAA developer, or just trying to learn, GameDev.net is the place for you to learn, share, and connect with the games industry. Learn more About Us or sign up!

Sign me up!