Jump to content
  • entries
    17
  • comments
    4
  • views
    875

Dev Log #2

Sign in to follow this  
FatPugStudio

248 views

It’s been almost two weeks and i’ve been very busy with my day job so i didn’t manage to spare too much time for game, but i finally finished (for me) a very complicated thing – upgrade and weapon switching system.

Player starts out with one weapon. During the game he can pickup a variety of weapons from destroyed cargo ships. The first time he picks up a weapon, it is added as a second weapon, and player can switch between them according to situation (bullet, energy and missile weapons don’t deal the same amount to normal, armored and shielded enemies). When another weapon appears as a pickup, two scenarios are possible: if the weapon is already equipped, it gets upgraded and the pickup despawns. If the weapon is already at maximum upgrade level, player is notified via on-screen message and the pickup stays where it is. If the weapon is not equipped, currently selected weapon is replaced (dropped as a pickup, while pickup spawns on player). While dropping the weapon is not very important in single player game and complicates the situation a lot, it is handy in 2 player game, where one player can drop a weapon for the other player to upgrade his weapon. The handy thing is that when a player drops, for example, Hyperblaster Level 4 and the other player picks it up, he’ll get the Level 4 Hyperblaster too, not level 1. Since there are (for now) 23 weapons in game and the only way to upgrade them (besides universal weapon upgrade pickups) is to pickup the same weapon, that will be very cool in terms of player cooperation.

Here’s a shot of an FSM:

Spaghetti codingSpaghetti coding

Basically, when the weapon spawns, it checks itself if it is a weapon or a pickup (by checking if it is parented or not). If it is a weapon, that means that it is player equipped and it is added to the array and the variable is stored if it is in slot one or slot two (required for weapon switching during the game). If it is a pickup, distance check state is activated. Player can only pick it up if he is closer than a defined distance from it (by pressing space, so no accidental pickups are possible). When he picks it up, it iterates through the array to see if it will replace the existing weapon (if no weapon of same type is found) or upgrade it (if weapon of same type is found). If it replaces it, the existing weapon is dropped (which means it is despawned, removed from array, spawned on location of a pickup with its firing scripts disabled and pickup indicator enabled, while next level weapon is spawned on gunpoint with its firing scripts enabled and pickup indicator disabled).
Weapon switching is, compare to the upgrade and pickup system, a walk in the park. Stored weapons are simply activated/deactivated by pressing the switch key.

Scripting this thing alone would probably take a lot more time than it did, so using Playmaker did the job pretty quick since i can try something out in a matter of seconds, not waiting to write a couple of lines with risk of making syntax errors.

But, here comes the downside. Instead of making the script that can just be copied/pasted on all weapons (have in mind that there are 23 weapon with 3-5 levels each, so that comes to about a hundred prefabs, with more to come), i have to copy/paste an FSM to every weapon and tweak the variables in each one of them. I don’t have to tell you that if any larger scale fixes in logic are necessary when all the weapons are already prepared it will be a lot of work to change everything. Not to mention the possibility of making errors when managing such a tedious task.

One more thing i did is implementing the sprite atlas which reduced draw calls a lot, and boosted frame rate from 15-30 FPS to ~150. Now everything goes very smoothly. There are some hiccups, but those are due to extensive logging which is quite necessary in this phase. Swarm missiles got an overhaul too, now they’re flying nicely in a semi-random homing pattern, they way i imagined them to be.

Swarm missiles flying nicely in a semi-random homing mannerSwarm missiles flying nicely in a semi-random homing manner

Also, the artist guy did some weapons art for me, some will maybe change, but i thing they’re pretty good looking and quite different.

A selection of collectable weaponsA selection of collectable weapons

The post Dev Log #2 appeared first on Fat Pug Studio.


View the full article

Sign in to follow this  


0 Comments


Recommended Comments

There are no comments to display.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Advertisement
  • Advertisement
  • Blog Entries

  • Similar Content

    • By BlackSpoon
      Hi guys, let me introduce my new project - Just Smash It! It's all about destruction! Break your way smashing objects with aimed shots!
      * Realistic physics of destruction
      * Smooth game flow
      * Pleasant graphic and sound design
      * Infinite mode after passing the basic set of levels
      * Small size, great time-killer!
      Play Market: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.blackspoongames.smashworld
      Feedback are welcome!
    • By Seer
      I have programmed an implementation of the Separating Axis Theorem to handle collisions between 2D convex polygons. It is written in Processing and can be viewed on Github here. There are a couple of issues with it that I would like some help in resolving.
      In the construction of Polygon objects, you specify the width and height of the polygon and the initial rotation offset by which the vertices will be placed around the polygon. If the rotation offset is 0, the first vertex is placed directly to the right of the object. If higher or lower, the first vertex is placed clockwise or counter-clockwise, respectively, around the circumference of the object by the rotation amount. The rest of the vertices follow by a consistent offset of TWO_PI / number of vertices. While this places the vertices at the correct angle around the polygon, the problem is that if the rotation is anything other than 0, the width and height of the polygon are no longer the values specified. They are reduced because the vertices are placed around the polygon using the sin and cos functions, which often return values other than 1 or -1. Of course, when the half width and half height are multiplied by a sin or cos value other than 1 or -1, they are reduced. This is my issue. How can I place an arbitrary number of vertices at an arbitrary rotation around the polygon, while maintaining both the intended shape specified by the number of vertices (triangle, hexagon, octagon), and the intended width and height of the polygon as specified by the parameter values in the constructor?
      The Polygon code:
      class Polygon { PVector position; PShape shape; int w, h, halfW, halfH; color c; ArrayList<PVector> vertexOffsets; Polygon(PVector position, int numVertices, int w, int h, float rotation) { this.position = position; this.w = w; this.h = h; this.halfW = w / 2; this.halfH = h / 2; this.c = color(255); vertexOffsets = new ArrayList<PVector>(); if(numVertices < 3) numVertices = 3; shape = createShape(); shape.beginShape(); shape.fill(255); shape.stroke(255); for(int i = 0; i < numVertices; ++i) { PVector vertex = new PVector(position.x + cos(rotation) * halfW, position.y + sin(rotation) * halfH); shape.vertex(vertex.x, vertex.y); rotation += TWO_PI / numVertices; PVector vertexOffset = vertex.sub(position); vertexOffsets.add(vertexOffset); } shape.endShape(CLOSE); } void move(float x, float y) { position.set(x, y); for(int i = 0; i < shape.getVertexCount(); ++i) { PVector vertexOffset = vertexOffsets.get(i); shape.setVertex(i, position.x + vertexOffset.x, position.y + vertexOffset.y); } } void rotate(float angle) { for(int i = 0; i < shape.getVertexCount(); ++i) { PVector vertexOffset = vertexOffsets.get(i); vertexOffset.rotate(angle); shape.setVertex(i, position.x + vertexOffset.x, position.y + vertexOffset.y); } } void setColour(color c) { this.c = c; } void render() { shape.setFill(c); shape(shape); } }  
      My other issue is that when two polygons with three vertices each collide, they are not always moved out of collision smoothly by the Minimum Translation Vector returned by the SAT algorithm. The polygon moved out of collision by the MTV does not rest against the other polygon as it should, it instead jumps back a small distance. I find this very strange as I have been unable to replicate this behaviour when resolving collisions between polygons of other vertex quantities and I cannot find the flaw in the implementation, though it must be there. What could be causing this incorrect collision resolution, which from my testing appears to only occur between polygons of three vertices?
      Any help you can provide on these issues would be greatly appreciated. Thank you.
    • By Rio Lloyd
      Hey all!
      we are a team of 3 looking for more members, 
      we are making an isometrical Survival RPG.
      we are looking For Members who can make low poly 3D artists who can do character models, environments, tools and more.
       
      if interested and want to know more email me at rioishere14@gmail.com
    • By nxrighthere
      BenchmarkNet is a console application for testing the reliable UDP networking solutions.
      Features:
      Asynchronous simulation of a large number of clients Stable under high loads Simple and flexible simulation setup Detailed session information Multi-process instances Supported networking libraries:
      ENet UNet LiteNetLib Lidgren MiniUDP Hazel Photon Neutrino DarkRift More information and source code on GitHub.
      You can find the latest benchmark results on the wiki page.
       
    • By ggenije
      Important: I am trying to realize in scrtach which is performance very low due to it's "virutal level" scrtach->flashplayer->java...
      Also i'm new to this forum so i'm sorry if I missed group (like last time)
      Like a title is saying:
      I have project ,and I get negative feedback on it because some people need 30 min to complete it (what is the planned time)
      but problem is that some people need EVEN 5 hours…(game is incremental/idle/upgrade type so it's important to keep same time ...)
      ———————————————————————————————————————-
      Of course people with slower computer will have less fps so game will be slower for them,
      so I have created TimeDelta system for each frame to calculate something to do per second
      for example
        Update(){move(TimeDelta*speed)}  so that mean it will be moving speed number of pixels(or units) per second so it will be same for almost each user.

      But problem is next:
      I have to change ySpeed by jumpPower (#PlayerJump in my project)
      when any jump button is pressed
      then in each frame decrease ySpeed by gravity it is(-10 * TimeDelta)
      but when someone have lower fps it will have higher TimeDelta and will fall faster but with same jump it turns out to jump significantly lower that changes core of game
      BUT even worse if fps suddenly in moment of jump then timeDelta would be 1 so player will jump much much MUCH higher , then fall much slower because timeDelta changed in meanwhile…(and the point of my game is about upgrading jump not complete game in first fps drop)


      —————————————————————————————————————————————————————

      Then I got an idea to fix TimeDelta (like in unity for rigibody) so it will be rounded like
      if calculated TimeDelta is 0.01834 it will be 0.02 fixed
      if weaker computer is using it the TImeDelta will be 0.143 so runded to 0.14 and so on…

      I did not manage to realize it… i tried to calculate it before main initialization of game objects
      but I'm afraid to fps will drop in moment that is calculating so it will be much diffirent…
      I was trying with empty loop(400)(in scrtach even this is taking time) to calculate it but i'm not sure is it right

      So is there good way to realize this fixed TimeDelta
      I only have timer function to use and time difference between frames
       
      This_is_the_link_for_the_game
×

Important Information

By using GameDev.net, you agree to our community Guidelines, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.

We are the game development community.

Whether you are an indie, hobbyist, AAA developer, or just trying to learn, GameDev.net is the place for you to learn, share, and connect with the games industry. Learn more About Us or sign up!

Sign me up!