Jump to content
  • Advertisement
  • entries
    228
  • comments
    58
  • views
    33035

Mobile Game Reviews: Let's Talk South Park: Phone Destroyer

Sign in to follow this  
NimbleThor

671 views

In this daily blog (and video)-series I take a first impressions look at the best mobile games that I come by. Be sure to share your favorite mobile game with the rest of us in the comments below!

Even though I have never watched South Park, this game had me literally giggling out loud (gol? :p) more than any other mobile game I've played these past few months!

It's a gacha card game with real-time PVP somewhat similar to Clash Royale, a single-player campaign, no chests you have to wait to open, and entertaining story-writing!

The only downside is that the IAPs are insanely expensive (you're looking at $5-6 for the third best pack of cards, whereas the best packs cost around $20!).

My thoughts on South Park: Phone Destroyer:


Google Play: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.ubisoft.dragonfire&hl=en
iOS: https://itunes.apple.com/dk/app/south-park-phone-destroyer/id1106442030?mt=8

Subscribe on YouTube for more commentaries: https://goo.gl/xKhGjh
Or join me on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/mobilegamefan/
Or Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/nimblethoryt/
Or Twitter: https://twitter.com/nimblethor

Sign in to follow this  


0 Comments


Recommended Comments

There are no comments to display.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Advertisement
  • Advertisement
  • Blog Entries

  • Similar Content

    • By kandarp_pandya
      Please check out my new game which is level based infinite target shooter.

      For Android
      https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.KPGames.KillSwitch

      For iOS
      https://apps.apple.com/in/app/kill-switch-2d/id1483464098

      Please let me know what you think about this. Also any suggestion feedback are most welcome.
    • By Davicus
      Does anyone have any thoughts on how to create paths for missiles that make random curly-q type patterns before homing in on a target? 
    • By Ruben Torres
      [The original post with its formatting can be found at the Unity UI Profiling entry]
      You spend an infinite amount of time optimizing your Unity UI. But, all it takes to really screw up performance is a sneaky modification on a tiny attribute of an almost invisible Canvas UI element. And when that happens, not even Unity UI Profiling will save you from dropping frames. Are you ready for the road ahead?
      This is what happened in my last project...
      I worked hard to optimize the several UI panels of our port to Oculus Quest. This was mostly about reducing the overdraw level to an acceptable amount to make sure the GPU would be all comfy with the real 3D rendering.
      So I worked on Unity UI Optimization for at least a month and made pretty damn good progress.
      At some point, it was so well optimized that the GPU timings were barely moved by the UI. The opaque UI shading techniques I applied compensated most of the overdraw caused by UI Layering (elements drawn on top of other elements).

      There I was, with a super optimized hybrid UI system that effectively occluded the 3D elements drawn behind it.  It became very easy to discard the rendering of these occluded fragments.
      However, I was far away from being done...
      When I hooked the Unity UI Profiler, one thing caught my attention.
      I saw an overwhelmed CPU taking over 1 ms per frame on UI rendering. That's a hell lot of time for a platform that gives you a budget of 13 ms for the whole game execution: physics, logic, 3D rendering, input, VR, networking are all in the same bucket.
      And I've seen cases where UI kills CPU performance even more.

      Unity UI: Expensive Build Batches
      And that is the thing: UI can be optimized to be GPU-friendly, but that doesn't directly translate into being CPU-performing.
      In fact, CPU and GPU have very different tasks to accomplish in Unity UI Rendering. No wonder, I suggest you approach CPU and GPU optimization very differently, as seen in my previous blog post about Unity UI Optimization.
      Doing more of Unity UI Profiling showed me the obvious problem: the UI was constantly being re-created every single frame, i.e. there was a Canvas Rebuild happening every frame.
      A constant hit of 1 ms on the CPU... ouch.
      But why would Unity do this to me?
      I thought Unity cached the UI Canvases...
      Actually yes, that is correct. Unity effectively caches the canvases to make sure they are built just once.
      The problem arises, though, when you change the properties of any of the UI elements of the canvas, such as a color, a position and so on.
      That means, all animations we love, such as button hover effects, are killing your performance and you might not know it.
      When UI property changes happen, Unity does the famous Canvas Rebuild that will crush your game's performance.
       
      A Unity UI Canvas Rebuild makes Unity iterate over all UI elements of that Canvas to generate an optimized list of draw calls (a set of vertices, colors, materials, etc.). And Canvas Rebuilds take longer than a Seat Panda doing a 0-60 mph test.
      That said, once you've acknowledged you suffered from constant UI Canvas Rebuilds, the natural question to make is...
       
      Why am I suffering the Canvas Rebuilds and what can I do about them?
      ​Answering that innocent question led me to spending 5+ hours researching this topic and empowering the Unity UI Profiler.
      Let's see how.
      Quick Navigation (they all redirect to the original blog page)
      1. Unity UI Profiling: All Good, until...
      2. Unity UI Profiling: A wild Canvas Rebuild appears!
      3. Finding the Saboteur: a politically incorrect brute-force approach
      4. Bonus: Augmenting the Unity Profiler for UI Optimization
       

      1. Unity UI Profiling: All Good, until...
      Let's say we have a weirdo of a UI in front of us.
      That UI is barely doing anything but sitting there, being annoying to the player who just want to see something through it.
      As a collection of 350+ images using a Grid Layout Group, it (miserably) looks like this:

      Unity UI Profiling Example
      And that's fine, even if it contains 350+ images. They will normally be rendered in just two draw calls, as there are two unique images that are not atlased in a sprite atlas.
      Effectively, I can see in the profiler there's almost no overhead on the CPU side. Most of the time we're under 0.01ms, which is pretty damn good.

      Unity UI Profiling: Sneaky Spike
      (...Most of the time)
      ​Wait, what was that CPU spike at the end of the graph?
       

      2. Unity UI Profiling: A wild Canvas Rebuild appears!
      What has just happened there at the end of the Unity Profile? The Unity UI CPU cost has more than doubled in just a second, how weird.
      I want to play a game
      Find the two differences in the samples below (you may want to click on them for zooming in).

      Unity UI Profiling: Cheap Canvas

      Unity UI Profiling: Canvas Rebuild
      I'll give you five seconds to find it out.
      5, 4... Ok here's a hint to make it easier:

      Unity UI Profiling: Canvas Rebuild Overhead
      Yikes!
      PostLateUpdate.UpdateRectTransform and UGUI.Rendering.UpdateBatches really wanted to take all the highlight in today's show.
      What do these regions do?
      The first, UpdateRectTransform, implies that a transform of a specific object has changed, and therefore Unity has to run some expensive logic to keep visuals coherent. We don't know whether it was a position, a rotation, a scale or any other of the RectTransform properties.
      Heck, we don't even know if it was just one attribute or all of them. Was it one object, or multiple? In any case, which ones? This is the problem: we do not know.
      The second cost, UpdateBatches, relates to the fact that the whole Canvas geometry has to be rebuilt. This process is famously known as a Canvas Rebuild. A canvas rebuild implies that Unity goes through all the Canvas hierarchy to generate a list of draw calls, so to speak. The vertices, indices, colors, uv's of all elements are computed and then a batching pass is done to we merge as many draw calls as possible to reduce the CPU overhead of issuing them to the graphics driver.
      Now we know what's going on, kind of. We're on the right track. But how do we go about avoiding these canvas rebuilds? What is causing them?
      We just need to find out more specific information...
      Summary

      An attribute change in a UI element will mark the element itself as dirty A UI element can be totally dirty, but can also be partially dirty: vertices-dirty, layout-dirty, material-dirty. Partial dirty states are cheaper to recover from Unity will rebuild canvases entirely, as soon as any of its elements are marked as dirty Canvas rebuilds are expensive on the CPU, avoiding them is the key  

      3. Finding the Saboteur: a politically incorrect brute-force approach
      We are still to give an answer to the following question:
      Who's triggering that sucky Unity UI Canvas Rebuild?
      It turns out, there's no fast way of finding that out, especially if your canvas hierarchy is immense.
      But, to start out, I'll show you the brute force approach for finding the source of UI Canvas Rebuilds.

      1. Keep the Unity UI Profiler recording
      Filter the metrics so you can focus on what is important: Rendering, Scripts, and UI.
      Keep an eye on the baseline to have a visual cue of your current baseline cost, which should include the expensive Canvas Rebuilds.

      2. Deactivate UI Game Objects and compare
      Select a group of game objects and deactivate it.
      Compare the performance baseline.
      If the baseline didn't improve much, continue deactivating game objects till you see a significant improvement.

      3. Find out who is modifying its properties
      Now you managed to isolate which object is triggering your Canvas Rebuilds. But, who's actually causing those?
      Is it a script scaling it? Or maybe an animation changing its position?
      It helps to do a right-click on the RectTransform and press "Find References in Scene"
      Once you know who's causing the UI canvas rebuilds, do something about it, such as disabling animations or transforms.
       
      Ruben, how am I supposed to follow this approach in a huge UI hierarchy? Don't give me crap
      I told you it was going to be neither fast nor fun, but your players asked for it.
      That's the thing. Having a huge hierarchy in place is not ideal in the first place. Exactly those massive, deep hierarchies will make your Canvas Rebuilds incredibly expensive on the CPU.
      But big and nested UI hierarchies can (and will) happen, so expect canvas rebuilds to hit you where it hurts the most: your players' game-play experience.
      While the brute force approach helps finding the source of canvas rebuilds, this does not scale in the long-run.
       
      Becoming more professional about optimizing UI is what got me into creating a tool that would give me all the answers I needed to match my players' expectations...

      Canvas Rebuild Profiling
       
      4. Bonus: Augmenting the Unity Profiler for UI Optimization
      By now, hopefully, I stressed enough how frequent and impactful UI Canvas Rebuilds can be.
      These troll canvas rebuilds that infested my game stole 10% of my entire CPU budget!
      As we saw, there is a slow brute-force approach for finding the source of a canvas rebuild. Then, I hope you'll be able to do something about it, based on the strategies I posted on my Unity UI Optimization post (visit it, it's free, I promise!).
      But such as error-prone approach is a process a real guru would never settle for. You can literally spend days trying to avoid canvas rebuilds, but the moment you expect it the least, they'll come back just to disappear as soon as you attach the Unity UI Profiler.
      This becomes crucial if you're doing VR development. You don't want canvas rebuilds in your world-space UI. Like not at all. If you don't get rid of these, you're very much likely to convert your players into patients.
      I get it, I will get rid of the canvas rebuilds. But the Unity Profiler won't tell me much about those! What advice can you give me?
      I'm glad you asked. It turns out we can convince the Unity Profiler to give us useful information about who's messing with the performance of our UI.
      You and I can augment the functionality of the Unity UI Profiler. We do so by altering the Unity UI source code that is publicly available. Once you have the source code, you'll want to find the code functions where the Canvas Rebuilds take place. Then, all we need is some BeginSample and EndSample Profiler API magic.
      If you're running Unity 2019.1 or earlier, the Unity UI source code is available for free in their Bitbucket repository. You can follow their guide there to download, install and modify it.
      My suggestion? Use a newer Unity version, at least 2019.2.0. New versions of Unity include the UI source code by default, as the UI system is now part of the package manager. That's the hassle-free way of doing this.
      Here's a list of code regions I found during my investigations where you could add the Profiling API calls:
      CanvasUpdateRegistry.cs: function PerformUpdate Graphic.cs: function SetAllDirty Graphic.cs: other functions such as SetVerticesDirty, SetMaterialDirty, etc..
      Unity UI: Profiling Source Code
      Useful? Yes. 
      Artist/Designer-friendly? No.
      That's why I wrote a small open-source Unity Extension to enhance the Unity Profiler for you.

      The free tool will allow you to quickly switch over profiling modes to make sure the performance of your game is on top.
      The best part of the Unity Profiler enhancer? It just works outside of the editor, effectively replacing all the aspirins you've been taking while profiling your UI in Android and other platforms. 
      Here it is, all its power under your control with two simple buttons: 
      Buff my Unity Profiler Nerf my Unity Profiler. Grab it now here:

    • By G-Dot
      Hello everyone! Recently I was doing behavior trees for enemies in my game and I've stuck with one issue. One enemy type of enemies is called Shooters (working name). So they've got a simple behaviour: pick a point near player, go to it and perform some attacks. The issue is what then they are picking point to move it happens that often they took almost equal points and I often see heaps of them in one single place. I want them to spread across arena evenly, but don't know how to do this. I think that it can be done with more advanced work with blackboards and communications. 
    • By Mutantgun
      Hi Everyone,
      Hopefully all of this makes sense at the end, but if you need anymore clarification please let me know.
      Background: My MMORPG is a sword playstyle based game, where players need to complete a dungeon at the end of each floor to be able to progress to the next. (Players can go back to lower floors / Specific floors will have specific resources needed for crafting as to give players a reason to go back / Player skill progression will also require them to do specific quests/tasks on specific floors, again giving them reason to go back)
      Inspiration: Sword Art Online (Anime) - Aincrad game that the players were stuck in
      My map progression issue is this: I'm split between having all players locked to a specific floor until they/or the party they are in, completes the dungeon, then those players unlock the next floor OR if as soon as a party clears the floors dungeon and unlocks the next floor, that floor is unlocked for everyone on the server.
      I'm going to split these into options 1 (Individual Progression) and 2 (Server Progression).
      Option 1:
      Benefits:
      Allows the more dedicated/end-game player base to progress at a faster pace. Allows for end-game guilds to form and recruit from a more end-game player pool, I.e. Players from that specific floor Allows end-game players to sell their services to help newer players to progress through the lower floors Drawbacks:
      Possibility of new players being stuck in lower floors as there might not be good enough players left on those floors to help them make a party and progress through the dungeon ? Option 2:
      Benefits:
      Allows new players to skip floor progression to be with their friends that have progressed further in the game ? Drawbacks:
      Players will be on floors where they might not be able to survive or complete solo content because of their lack of skill, items, game knowledge Complains from new players saying the content is too difficult, as they are skipping floors New/lower player base will essentially just be waiting on the end-game players to finish the new floor unlocking it for the rest of the server, basically letting them sponge off of the top players progress After typing all of this out it's starting to become more clear cut as to which option I should take, but I'd like to check with the community here as I'm sure there are other benefits/drawbacks that I'm missing that might change my view of things.
  • Advertisement
×

Important Information

By using GameDev.net, you agree to our community Guidelines, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.

GameDev.net is your game development community. Create an account for your GameDev Portfolio and participate in the largest developer community in the games industry.

Sign me up!