Jump to content
  • Advertisement
Sign in to follow this  
  • entries
  • comments
  • views

The future of man-kind..

Sign in to follow this  


Does not look good at this point.

Nothing I am going to say here is all that original, not im my opinion. However I feel that alot of it is mostly unheard.

First off, I think we are currently a bacteria on this planet, but at a much higher level then we think of when we hear bacteria. I think it still hold true due to the ammount of time we have been on this planet, and how much we have changed it. We collect, consume, and destroy everything we can. Really we even told ourselves that its the correct thing to do, after all "god put that there for us to use" is what some of us are told when we are young. Ill back that up a little by saying that I have surrounded myself with exotic items, that I know are destined for a landfil. These 'exotic' things include my computer monitor, which is composed of glass, wire, plastic, and some toxic stuff I dont know about. These materials would never have collected in this space in front of me if they were not taken from various other locations that I could not travel to myself. You can do this for everything on your desk, well I was able to anyways. We really are comsuming our environment unconsiously moat of the time, consious the rest. No other species on this planet (that I know of) does this to its environment, and they have all been here longer than us.

Now thats just the 'environmental-issue', assuming that we never created the current global warming situation, and that everything is 'normal' as far as the plant's health, we would still have another problem. That problem (IMO) is genetic deterioration. What I mean by that, is I think we are making every generation weaker. We have come to learn, that using the same pestiside will over time, become ineffectave. The insects become immune to the poision, or whatever was used to make them dislike the plants. I feel it could also be said that every time we use a product to eleviate ourselves of some undesireable sympton, we will become more vournable to said sympton, or whatever is causing it. I feel this way because our body (IMHO) is not required to do as much as it would have to normally. It will come to be dependant on that product to take care of the problem in the future. It is understood that some species that live in many different parts of the world, can have different enviromental challenges. For example, a squirel that lives in Maine, will have to save food for a longer ammount of time then one from california. This type of habbit in the species comes in information passed down from parent to child, in the genetics. The building blocks work the same, it is crazy for us to think that there will not be negitave side effects from the use of these products over a long period of time.

People at one time, died alot more often, maybe. It is hard to tell if they really did die more often, but I think we are letting too many people live. I feel that this issue is related to the last one a little. When Cougars started attacking people in California, they said "the city is expanding.. bla bla, people in the cats environment.. bla bla, hungry cat eats person". Nothing hard to understand there. What is hard for me to understand is why people are suprised about getting attacked, you are in a mountian, its a mountian-cat. However many hundreds (or thousands) of years ago, if someone was going to be in that mountian, they would be prepared for a mountian-cat, bring a gun, big stick, or more people to keep safe. We no loger worry about this. People would get eaten by animals, poisioned, fall into a coma, get cancer, get infected, and the list goes on but you should see the point. We can now live on from things that would have normally killed someone, thus allowing them the chance to procreate. I feel that we are letting natural selection to fail in its purpose. Survival of the fittest indeed. I know this has the potential to piss people off, but I think that natures solution to this is homosexuality, and HIV/AIDS. Maybe AIDS is something that has been for all of time, and we are just new to it. But I feel homosexuality is created by the population size. It seems that it is more common in areas of higher populations. When humans were 'younger' (I'm talking about hundres of thousands, or even millions of years ago), there were no mass societies for people to live in, thus there was always a need for offspring. Take away the actual need for sex, when standing in a large city like New York you may feel very little need to contribute to the whole. Maybe even more so when times are bad. I don't think I should continue to speculate on the source of homosexuality in our society. What I wanted to point out, is that we are over-populated, and most homosexuals are not going to have offspring by nature. Thus making the homosexual person a contributor to the over-population solution. As unfortuniate as it may be, AIDS is known to kill people. And it even can be passed down to children. This effectivly cuts off a branch of a family tree. Best case senerio, an infected parent, does not infect the offspring and that child is allowed to reproduce freely. Worst case secerio, the virus prevents the infected person from reproducing by attacking the immune system of the infected person and everyone that person attempts to procreate with. This is currently what is happening in Africa (IIRC) with HIV/AIDS.

I cant write any more tonight. I still have one more thing to say about "The future of man-kind..", Next post.

If you find a spelling, or grammar error, please ignore it.
Sign in to follow this  


Recommended Comments

Hey be sure to recycle that monitor so it doesn't end up in the earth. Keep in mind that all of the molecules, such as toxic ones, were here before we got here. We aren't destroying the earth. We are just reconfiguring it and our ability to live on it(human environment).

Population control is an issue. But if we are all living longer doesn't that negate your genetic deterioration theory? Just wondering. Perhaps homogayexualism? is the solution. Or we could just start birth licenses. Or perhaps start some form of genetic manipulation. You know like we do with corn. Perhaps we should just let the gay people live longer [smile] Let's say that the US did implement one of these solutions (ultimate solution?), would this solve the world's overpopulation problem? When looking at the US population compared to certain other country's populations, it doesn't even look like we have a problem.

I know that conspiracies abound about the AIDS virus being a manufactured form of population control. By some peoples estimates, the African economy will suffer greatly during the next century as a whole generation is wiped out by this virus.

You didn't even mention organized religion as part of the problem? In many parts of the world, even in the US, organized religion continues to keep people from truly understanding reality. I'll quote yoda, "All his life has he looked away... to the future, to the horizon. Never his mind on where he was. Hmm? What he was doing. Hmph. Adventure. Heh. Excitement. Heh. A Jedi craves not these things. You are reckless." I know. I know. I just went on about reality and then quoted a puppet. But come on there are far to many people that actually believe the earth is only a few thousand years old and that they're going to be whisked away any time. So it's like a big party for them (consume what thou will, sayeth the lord).

Share this comment

Link to comment
I guess I didn't think of them as solutions, but I wanted to present them as problems. :) This stuff has been building up in me for a little while, just looking at current events.

But if we are all living longer doesn't that negate your genetic deterioration theory?

I don't think so. Just because we are still using the products, we are not able to see what would happen without them.

Thanks for making the religion point for me, I didn't want to touch it.

Share this comment

Link to comment
but I wanted to present them as problems. :) This stuff has been building up in me for a little while, just looking at current events.
I know. One thing I did was to stop watching the cable 24 hour news service. They only cover like 0.0003% of actual news and what they do cover is sensationalism. Now I just read http://www.terradaily.com/ - http://www.spacewar.com/ and the BBC website.

I don't think so. Just because we are still using the products, we are not able to see what would happen without them.
Oh my that's a scary thought! All those people on anti-depressants - cut off! No more flu shots for the masses!!

Share this comment

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Advertisement

Important Information

By using GameDev.net, you agree to our community Guidelines, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.

GameDev.net is your game development community. Create an account for your GameDev Portfolio and participate in the largest developer community in the games industry.

Sign me up!