• entries
    146
  • comments
    436
  • views
    197634

Even better

Sign in to follow this  
Washu

126 views

This one is even better...in fact, it's soo much better that if I make it any more complex the VS2k5 compiler crashes [grin]


for(std::size_t n=(*&n=1,std::plus<int>()(??-0,1));
n??'(int(2)+??-(~8)^1);
(n+=??-0+2)){(n==8&&std::cout<<char(100+14)<<(char)0x6C,
!(((&n)??((~0+1)&(1)])^(2<<(1<<1??'0)))?(std::cout.rdbuf()->sputc(0x64),
std::endl(std::cout)):(n?(std::ostream(std::cout.rdbuf()),!(n??'1)?
std::cout<<char(*((char*)&n)+100):n>1&&n<4?(0,
std::cout)<<(char)108,std::cout:(n??'4&&n??'7)?(n??'6||std::cout<<'w',
n!=5||(&std::cout)->rdbuf()->sputc(0x20)),std::cout:std::cout<<'o'):
(std::ostream((*&std::cout).rdbuf()).rdbuf()->sputc((int)std::plus<int>()(0x40,2<<2)),
std::cout)))<<"\0\x8";??>

Sign in to follow this  


3 Comments


Recommended Comments

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now