Jump to content
  • Advertisement
  • entries
    503
  • comments
    1888
  • views
    334958

a glimpse of the future

Sign in to follow this  
EDI

91 views

so now that I have splatting taken care of, I am moving on to lighting, but not without another comped view.



Above we see what 2D sprites will look like on our 3D terrain, clearly a more detailed terrain would be better, but this is still a work in progress =)




Everybody wait for it...
Any comments/questions/thoughts about this? =D
Sign in to follow this  


6 Comments


Recommended Comments

It *must* look good -- I thought those were real-time rendered 3D models until you said otherwise. :P

Share this comment


Link to comment
You'll need to find some way to make the trees look like they're actually attached to the terrain ... when I first look at it, it looks like they're just floating there (could just be me though). Other than that, it looks neat, I like the style you're going with.

Share this comment


Link to comment
you are right, a built-in 'sprigs of grass' around the base of most things should do the trick I think?

Share this comment


Link to comment
I think if the terrain matched the sprites in vibrance and style (or vice versa), it would really go a long way to make it look more consistant and seamless. I also agree with the grass idea. The hard black outline of the sprites' edge also strongly separates them from the terrain.

Share this comment


Link to comment
It looks good to me, but I keep thinking: If you were using an already made engine like Irrlicht or OGRE(which can easily do 3D and 2D as well) you would have solved this and many more problems already, and you would be writing the game right now, not a terrain rendering library. It's you decision though, so good luck :) I like the style of it.

Share this comment


Link to comment
In a way you are right.

However while is may seem like a waste of time, I think it is very important. As a developer I would not feel satisfied taking an existing game engine and using it. Unlike the Flare engine, the S3 Engine is being designed as the engine we will use for a long time. I donot really 'enjoy' writing game engines (though some parts are enjoyable) however for us it is a neccicary evil that we develop our games with our own engine. Our goal is to also licence this engine when it is completed (in addition to game creation) since unlike Flare it will be entirely data-driven and very easy to use by comparison.

To sum it up, we develop game engines because it is Satisfying, Impressive and embodies the DIY spirit.

Could we get a game out sooner using a pre-built engine? maybe, assuming it did all of what we needed, but I got into this industry to make games and to me, that means the engine too.

Thankfully I have come to realize that libraries are helpful; to date we are using:

The C++ Standard Library [containers and algorithms]
TinyXML [xml reading]
Lua [scripting]
Boost [smart pointers, serialization]

and there will likely be many more to come.

Share this comment


Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Advertisement
×

Important Information

By using GameDev.net, you agree to our community Guidelines, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.

We are the game development community.

Whether you are an indie, hobbyist, AAA developer, or just trying to learn, GameDev.net is the place for you to learn, share, and connect with the games industry. Learn more About Us or sign up!

Sign me up!