Jump to content
  • Advertisement
  • 08/15/17 02:01 AM

    Mixamo Nix(amo)s Face Plus: Adobe Ending Some Features August 22nd

    GameDev Unboxed

    Jesse "Chime" Collins

    3D Rigger Mixamo Is Making Some Changes

    Originally founded in 2008, Mixamo has been a go-to source for 3D animation and rigging for nearly a decade. On August 28th, 2013, Mixamo launched a platform called Face Plus. It was designed to allow developers or animators turn facial expressions recorded with even a webcam into top-notch 3D animation. This is not unlike what Holotech Studios’ “FaceRig” does for streamers and video creators as well.

    Back this past May 2017, Adobe (publishers of the Mixamo platform since 2015) announced the end of an era. Mixamo’s Face Plus will be removed on August 22nd, 2017, as well as several other free features.

    According to the Adobe post on the Mixamo website, they lay out what is changing and what is staying the same.

    Set out as bullet points in the post, they seem to be cleaning house on the “free” features. But, they are keeping a small handful of their main key points, such as:

    • Select and use characters from Mixamo’s Character Collection

    • Upload 3D characters to get them ready to animate using the Auto-Rigger

    • Apply animations to characters

    • Download as an .fbx or .dae

    Noticeably, the list that’s getting 86’ed includes major tools and the ability to save assets from their site:

    • The ability to save and retrieve assets in “My Assets”.

    • The Face Plus facial animation plugin

    • The Decimator polygon reduction tool

    • The ability to download Control-rig scripts

    • Download types for .bvh and .biped that streamline integration with 3rd party applications

    • Mixamo forums will close and all help articles will be moved to Adobe’s HelpX

    Don't Worry! There's still time!

    home-pipeline-malcolm.png
    They’re allowing people to still download the tools and plug-ins until August 22nd, as well as utilizing their easy-to-download features of saving Assets directly. Those that use Mixamo, utilize Face Plus, or even just do animation are highly encouraged to take advantage and download the tools for the next week.

    To download, sign into your (free) Adobe account at the Mixamo website and start downloading. Developers have only one week left to grab as much as they can. For a complete FAQ and how-to for the Mixamo massacre, check out the Adobe post from their Customer Care Team.

    UPDATE (8/15/17): Adobe would like to stress that Mixamo, itself, is not going anywhere, just the Face Plus features, the tools mentioned above, and a couple other features to make the platform more "streamlined and a little modernized". Once the dust is cleared next week from the changes, I'll reach out to Adobe from a more guided tour of the new set-up. Additionally, I have changed the title of this article to reflect the clarification. Apologies for the inconvenience to those that have already read the article. 

    Mixamo_Logo.png

    Edited by Jesse "Chime" Collins



      Report Column Entry


    User Feedback


    Guest Chantel @ Adobe

    Posted

    Hi Jesse - thanks for covering the changes happening to Mixamo. Your title is very clever, the team loves it! But, we feel the message is a little misleading. As you point out in your article, we are preserving all the main features, just cleaning up the site so that it is streamlined and a little modernized. Would you consider updating "Not Nix-amo?" 

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    46 minutes ago, Guest Chantel @ Adobe said:

    Hi Jesse - thanks for covering the changes happening to Mixamo. Your title is very clever, the team loves it! But, we feel the message is a little misleading. As you point out in your article, we are preserving all the main features, just cleaning up the site so that it is streamlined and a little modernized. Would you consider updating "Not Nix-amo?" 

    Hey Chantel! May I use the comment here as a quote in the Update? As far as the Adobe note goes, they make it seem like Face Plus is completely going away, as well as a chunk of the features. Maybe a simple change to the title like "Mixamo Nix(amo)s Face Plus", then?

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Hello there,

    Does anybody have downloaded the software fuse and the plugin face plus (for unity) before they have removed all from the server? If so, is there a possibility that I could have this? 

    Thanks for your answer.

    Best regards

    Manu

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    On 4/9/2017 at 9:13 AM, Chromnutz said:

    Hello there,

    Does anybody have downloaded the software fuse and the plugin face plus (for unity) before they have removed all from the server? If so, is there a possibility that I could have this? 

    Thanks for your answer.

    Best regards

    Manu

    did u get the files? im also looking for them :S

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites


    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

  • Advertisement
  • Similar Content

    • By bandages
      So, in real life, incoming dot normal at the silhouette is always 0.  With smooth shaded meshes, it never is, not naturally, not outside of contrived situations.  (Not with flat shaded meshes either, I guess.)
      And incoming dot normal is one of the bedrocks of CG.  Probably the equal of 4x4 matrix multiplication.  Problems with silhouette normals show up in Fresnel, in diffuse lighting, in environment mapping....  everywhere.  But I can't really find anybody talking about it.  (Maybe I'm not Googling the right terms.)
      Obviously, the problem decreases as poly count goes up, eventually reaching a point where it's dwarfed by other silhouette problems (like translucency or micro-occlusion) that CG doesn't handle well either.  But, if I'm reasoning correctly, normal maps don't improve the problem-- they're as likely to exacerbate it as improve it, and the exacerbations are, aesthetically speaking, probably worse than the improvements are better.
      I've tried playing with crude fixes-- basically, rotating normals toward incoming by a percentage, or of course clamping incoming dot normal (like we all have to do) to prevent it from bending behind the mesh.  Nothing I've tried looks good.  I suppose the best option might be to rotate normals to perpendicular to incoming at the silhouette and then interpolate to the nearest inflection point  of something like screen space depth to preserve curvature, but the math for how to do that is beyond me, and I'm not sure it would look any better.  Or maybe, instead, somehow, adjust the drawn silhouette to match the silhouette defined by incoming dot normal?  Not even sure how that would work, not if the normal was pointing away from incoming.
      I don't know-- is this a solvable problem?  Has anyone tried other stuff and given up, pursued anything that was promising but too expensive, anything like that?  Are there any papers I'm missing?  It's really surprising to me that I can't find anyone else talking about this.
      (Apologies if I chose the wrong subforum for this.  I considered art forums, but I felt that people frequenting the programming forums would have more to say on the subject.)
    • By vinibiavatti
      Hi there! I have one issue for now. I'm creating a RayCasting application, and for my floor and ceiling I'm trying to use Mode7 for rendering (I think this is easier to understand). but, I cant align the RayCasting walls with the mode7 floor. I use a rotate matrix to make the rotation of floor. Do you know what a need to think in the implementation to fix that? Or do you know if there is some tutorial explaining about it? Thanks!!! (Check the image below for understand)

      Here is my mode7 code:
      function mode7() { let _x = 0; let _y = 0; let z = 0; let sin = Math.sin(degreeToRadians(data.player.angle)); let cos = Math.cos(degreeToRadians(data.player.angle)); for(let y = data.projection.halfHeight; y < data.projection.height; y++) { for(let x = 0; x < data.projection.width; x++) { _x = ((data.projection.width - x) * cos) - (x * sin); _y = ((data.projection.width - x) * sin) + (x * cos); _x /= z; _y /= z; if(_y < 0) _y *= -1; if(_x < 0) _x *= -1; _y *= 8.0; _x *= 8.0; _y %= data.floorTextures[0].height; _x %= data.floorTextures[0].width; screenContext.fillStyle = data.floorTextures[0].data[Math.floor(_x) + Math.floor(_y) * data.floorTextures[0].width]; screenContext.fillRect(x, y, 1, 1); } z += 1; } }  
    • By DiligentDev
      The latest release of Diligent Engine combines a number of recent updates (Vulkan on iOS, GLTF2.0 support, shadows), significantly improves performance of OpenGL backend, updates API, adds integration with Dear Imgui and implements new samples and tutorials. Some of the new features in this release:
      GLTF2.0 support (loader, PBR renderer and sample viewer) Shadowing Component and Shadows Sample Integration with Dear Imgui library and Dear Imgui demo Tutorial13 - Shadow Map Tutorial14 - Compute Shader Tutorial15 - Multiple Windows Check it out on GitHub.
        
       
       
  • Advertisement
×

Important Information

By using GameDev.net, you agree to our community Guidelines, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.

GameDev.net is your game development community. Create an account for your GameDev Portfolio and participate in the largest developer community in the games industry.

Sign me up!