• ### Announcements

#### Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

## 34 posts in this topic

I love you guys. All of you. You know that? I haven''t been here for over two years, and you still have that post. :tears in eyes: =D

You guys rock!
0

##### Share on other sites
Nice tip.
May I point few enhancements ?

1- don't mandate viewport[0] and viewport[1] are null. In the generic case, it's better to call that instead :
glOrtho(vPort[0], vPort[0]+vPort[2], vPort[1], vPort[1]+vPort[3], -1, 1);

2- for pixel-exact positioning, the usage of a slight translation is mandatory, as explained in the opengl.org's FAQ :
 glMatrixMode(GL_MODELVIEW);glPushMatrix();glLoadIdentity();glTranslatef(0.375, 0.375, 0.);

3- disable depth testing while rendering 2D. But this means 2D stuff has to be rendered AFTER all 3D stuff, in case 2D represents some kind of HUD (acronym of Heads Up Display).

So the new code becomes :
 void glEnable2D(){ int vPort[4]; glGetIntegerv(GL_VIEWPORT, vPort); glMatrixMode(GL_PROJECTION); glPushMatrix(); glLoadIdentity(); glOrtho(vPort[0], vPort[0]+vPort[2], vPort[1], vPort[1]+vPort[3], -1, 1); glMatrixMode(GL_MODELVIEW); glPushMatrix(); glLoadIdentity(); glTranslatef(0.375, 0.375, 0.); glPushAttrib(GL_DEPTH_BUFFER_BIT); glDisable(GL_DEPTH_TEST);}void glDisable2D(){ glPopAttrib(); glMatrixMode(GL_PROJECTION); glPopMatrix(); glMatrixMode(GL_MODELVIEW); glPopMatrix(); }

Keep up the good work =)
0

##### Share on other sites
For me the important thing is speed, I have 2D and 3D elements every frame and it is important that the framerate not suffer to bad. I came up with the idea of saving the matrix and reloading it, instead of recalculating it, I have not tested for a speed difference, but it seems as though it would have to be faster.

Basically, you would call both the Perspective#D functions at the start of the program and then call the Render#D function before you draw depending on what you want to draw.

#define RENDER_2D 2030#define RENDER_3D 2031double* matrix2D = new float[16];double* matrix3D = new float[16];short renderMode;void Perspective3D(float p_fov, float p_near, float p_far, float width, float height) {	renderMode = RENDER_3D;	float lw = (float)width, lh = (float)height;	if(height == 0) height = 1;	glViewport(0,0,width,height);	glMatrixMode(GL_PROJECTION);	glLoadIdentity();	gluPerspective(p_fov,lw/lh,p_near,p_far);	glMatrixMode(GL_MODELVIEW);	glGetDoublev(GL_PROJECTION_MATRIX , matrix3D);	glLoadIdentity();}void Render3D() {	if(renderMode==RENDER_3D) return;	renderMode = RENDER_3D;	glMatrixMode(GL_PROJECTION);	glLoadMatrixd(matrix3D);	glMatrixMode(GL_MODELVIEW);}void Perspective2D(RECT size) {	renderMode = RENDER_2D;	glViewport(size.left, size.bottom, size.right, size.top);	glMatrixMode(GL_PROJECTION);	glLoadIdentity();	gluOrtho2D(size.left, size.right, size.bottom, size.top);	glMatrixMode(GL_MODELVIEW);	glGetDoublev(GL_PROJECTION_MATRIX, matrix2D);	glLoadIdentity();}void Render2D() {	if(renderMode==RENDER_2D) return;	renderMode = RENDER_2D;	glMatrixMode(GL_PROJECTION);	glLoadMatrixd(matrix2D);	glMatrixMode(GL_MODELVIEW);}
0

##### Share on other sites
my guess is that push/pop is faster than get/load, and it also saves memory. The only problem with push and pop is that you're limited in some (quite high, yet limited) stack depth.
0

##### Share on other sites
Push / Pop would be faster, but thats not all you would be doing. Any way you look at it you have to get the new Matrix into the projection matrix stack. I would think that calling glLoadMatrix is faster than glOrtho or another function that has to re-calculate the matrix every frame. Memory... its 16 doubles, thats like 128 bytes, I dont think thats to much to sacrifice for a possible speed gain.
0

##### Share on other sites
Quote:
 Original post by Eber KainI would think that calling glLoadMatrix is faster than glOrtho or another function that has to re-calculate the matrix every frame.

Sure, but in the method you posted you call glOrtho as often as I do. :) So where's the performance loss ?

And while you're pointing correctly that glLoadMatrix may be faster than glOrtho, I'd like to point that glGetDoublev is much slower than any kind of matrix operation. In general, anything read back from the server side should be discarded when you look for the highest performance.
0

##### Share on other sites
Optimising this for speed is a complete waste of time. Unless you're switching between 2D and 3D thousands of times per frame, you won't see any noticeable increase in frame rate.
0

##### Share on other sites
In the code I posted, you call Perspective#D once in your entire program. You then call Render#D before drawing to specify if you want 2D or 3D.
0

##### Share on other sites
OKey GRATE so now how d0 I trun this into a gaeM?!?!?!????

(P.S. Thanks, that's awesome, and makes me almost wish I used OpenGL)
0

##### Share on other sites
Quote:
 Original post by Eber KainIn the code I posted, you call Perspective#D once in your entire program.

Yes it is called thousands of time during the game, but what's important is that it's called once PER FRAME. It's true that optimizing every part of the engine is always a gain, but it's also true that if the performance gain makes almost no difference you'd better spend your time on other optimization things that will significantly improve frame rate, and come back later (probably in the end) on such negligible improvements.

Quote:
 Original post by TubeOKey GRATE so now how d0 I trun this into a gaeM?!?!?!????

Sure, I have the three lines of code solution that makes anything a great game everyone would love. Mind me if I post it later ?
0

• ### Similar Content

• By mapra99
Hello

I am working on a recent project and I have been learning how to code in C# using OpenGL libraries for some graphics. I have achieved some quite interesting things using TAO Framework writing in Console Applications, creating a GLUT Window. But my problem now is that I need to incorporate the Graphics in a Windows Form so I can relate the objects that I render with some .NET Controls.

To deal with this problem, I have seen in some forums that it's better to use OpenTK instead of TAO Framework, so I can use the glControl that OpenTK libraries offer. However, I haven't found complete articles, tutorials or source codes that help using the glControl or that may insert me into de OpenTK functions. Would somebody please share in this forum some links or files where I can find good documentation about this topic? Or may I use another library different of OpenTK?

Thanks!

• Hello, I have been working on SH Irradiance map rendering, and I have been using a GLSL pixel shader to render SH irradiance to 2D irradiance maps for my static objects. I already have it working with 9 3D textures so far for the first 9 SH functions.
In my GLSL shader, I have to send in 9 SH Coefficient 3D Texures that use RGBA8 as a pixel format. RGB being used for the coefficients for red, green, and blue, and the A for checking if the voxel is in use (for the 3D texture solidification shader to prevent bleeding).
My problem is, I want to knock this number of textures down to something like 4 or 5. Getting even lower would be a godsend. This is because I eventually plan on adding more SH Coefficient 3D Textures for other parts of the game map (such as inside rooms, as opposed to the outside), to circumvent irradiance probe bleeding between rooms separated by walls. I don't want to reach the 32 texture limit too soon. Also, I figure that it would be a LOT faster.
Is there a way I could, say, store 2 sets of SH Coefficients for 2 SH functions inside a texture with RGBA16 pixels? If so, how would I extract them from inside GLSL? Let me know if you have any suggestions ^^.
• By KarimIO
EDIT: I thought this was restricted to Attribute-Created GL contexts, but it isn't, so I rewrote the post.
Hey guys, whenever I call SwapBuffers(hDC), I get a crash, and I get a "Too many posts were made to a semaphore." from Windows as I call SwapBuffers. What could be the cause of this?
Update: No crash occurs if I don't draw, just clear and swap.
static PIXELFORMATDESCRIPTOR pfd = // pfd Tells Windows How We Want Things To Be { sizeof(PIXELFORMATDESCRIPTOR), // Size Of This Pixel Format Descriptor 1, // Version Number PFD_DRAW_TO_WINDOW | // Format Must Support Window PFD_SUPPORT_OPENGL | // Format Must Support OpenGL PFD_DOUBLEBUFFER, // Must Support Double Buffering PFD_TYPE_RGBA, // Request An RGBA Format 32, // Select Our Color Depth 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, // Color Bits Ignored 0, // No Alpha Buffer 0, // Shift Bit Ignored 0, // No Accumulation Buffer 0, 0, 0, 0, // Accumulation Bits Ignored 24, // 24Bit Z-Buffer (Depth Buffer) 0, // No Stencil Buffer 0, // No Auxiliary Buffer PFD_MAIN_PLANE, // Main Drawing Layer 0, // Reserved 0, 0, 0 // Layer Masks Ignored }; if (!(hDC = GetDC(windowHandle))) return false; unsigned int PixelFormat; if (!(PixelFormat = ChoosePixelFormat(hDC, &pfd))) return false; if (!SetPixelFormat(hDC, PixelFormat, &pfd)) return false; hRC = wglCreateContext(hDC); if (!hRC) { std::cout << "wglCreateContext Failed!\n"; return false; } if (wglMakeCurrent(hDC, hRC) == NULL) { std::cout << "Make Context Current Second Failed!\n"; return false; } ... // OGL Buffer Initialization glClear(GL_DEPTH_BUFFER_BIT | GL_COLOR_BUFFER_BIT); glBindVertexArray(vao); glUseProgram(myprogram); glDrawElements(GL_TRIANGLES, indexCount, GL_UNSIGNED_SHORT, (void *)indexStart); SwapBuffers(GetDC(window_handle));
• By Tchom
Hey devs!

I've been working on a OpenGL ES 2.0 android engine and I have begun implementing some simple (point) lighting. I had something fairly simple working, so I tried to get fancy and added color-tinting light. And it works great... with only one or two lights. Any more than that, the application drops about 15 frames per light added (my ideal is at least 4 or 5). I know implementing lighting is expensive, I just didn't think it was that expensive. I'm fairly new to the world of OpenGL and GLSL, so there is a good chance I've written some crappy shader code. If anyone had any feedback or tips on how I can optimize this code, please let me know.

uniform mat4 u_MVPMatrix; uniform mat4 u_MVMatrix; attribute vec4 a_Position; attribute vec3 a_Normal; attribute vec2 a_TexCoordinate; varying vec3 v_Position; varying vec3 v_Normal; varying vec2 v_TexCoordinate; void main() { v_Position = vec3(u_MVMatrix * a_Position); v_TexCoordinate = a_TexCoordinate; v_Normal = vec3(u_MVMatrix * vec4(a_Normal, 0.0)); gl_Position = u_MVPMatrix * a_Position; } Fragment Shader
precision mediump float; uniform vec4 u_LightPos["+numLights+"]; uniform vec4 u_LightColours["+numLights+"]; uniform float u_LightPower["+numLights+"]; uniform sampler2D u_Texture; varying vec3 v_Position; varying vec3 v_Normal; varying vec2 v_TexCoordinate; void main() { gl_FragColor = (texture2D(u_Texture, v_TexCoordinate)); float diffuse = 0.0; vec4 colourSum = vec4(1.0); for (int i = 0; i < "+numLights+"; i++) { vec3 toPointLight = vec3(u_LightPos[i]); float distance = length(toPointLight - v_Position); vec3 lightVector = normalize(toPointLight - v_Position); float diffuseDiff = 0.0; // The diffuse difference contributed from current light diffuseDiff = max(dot(v_Normal, lightVector), 0.0); diffuseDiff = diffuseDiff * (1.0 / (1.0 + ((1.0-u_LightPower[i])* distance * distance))); //Determine attenuatio diffuse += diffuseDiff; gl_FragColor.rgb *= vec3(1.0) / ((vec3(1.0) + ((vec3(1.0) - vec3(u_LightColours[i]))*diffuseDiff))); //The expensive part } diffuse += 0.1; //Add ambient light gl_FragColor.rgb *= diffuse; } Am I making any rookie mistakes? Or am I just being unrealistic about what I can do? Thanks in advance
• By yahiko00
Hi,
Not sure to post at the right place, if not, please forgive me...
For a game project I am working on, I would like to implement a 2D starfield as a background.
I do not want to deal with static tiles, since I plan to slowly animate the starfield. So, I am trying to figure out how to generate a random starfield for the entire map.
I feel that using a uniform distribution for the stars will not do the trick. Instead I would like something similar to the screenshot below, taken from the game Star Wars: Empire At War (all credits to Lucasfilm, Disney, and so on...).

Is there someone who could have an idea of a distribution which could result in such a starfield?
Any insight would be appreciated

• 11
• 12
• 21
• 11
• 28