VC++ 6.0 or VC++.net?

Started by
13 comments, last by tordyvel 21 years, 7 months ago
quote:Original post by Slartibartfastm
>>Original post by Jonus
>>1.) Only buy VC++ 6 if you can get it very cheap.
>>2.) VC#.net is a differtet app then VC++.net

Actually C# and C++ use the same app, just different compilers.
Yes, ...

    if ( you buy VS.NET Professional or better)  return true;else  return false;    


I just wanted to say with "VC#.net is a differtet app then VC++.net" that C++ and C# are two different programming languages.

[edited by - Jonus on September 11, 2002 7:17:40 PM]
Advertisement
So that you can pay only for the stuff you really need?

______________________________
Oooh, you found the horadric cube!
Editor42 ...builds worlds
I have a question about VC++.NET.

Does it work on XP Home? I''ve heard that people have had trouble with it when using XP Home.

Thanks!
It does work, BESIDES the web development part. VS.NET relies on IIS for web development, and this is absent in XP Home.


Regards

Thomas Tomiczek
THONA Consulting Ltd.
(Microsoft MVP C#/.NET)
RegardsThomas TomiczekTHONA Consulting Ltd.(Microsoft MVP C#/.NET)
From comparing the bullet item features, it seems to me that the $100 version of VC++.NET does not optimize the code as well as the C++ in Visual Studio.NET does. So be careful. So far, I''ve assumed that C++ code compiled with VC++ 6.0 will generally run faster than VC++.Net.

If I''m wrong and if VC++.NET does generate code as fast as VC++ 6.0, let me know and I''ll be at the store tomorrow with my $100.

This topic is closed to new replies.

Advertisement