hehe
Code question?
1945 baby... oh yeah...
http://www.computer.org/annals/an1997/a2017abs.htm
Then fortran, then lisp (''56?)
Though, I''d agree fortran was the first widely accepted language.
Anybody know objective-c? looks like fun stuff...
http://www.computer.org/annals/an1997/a2017abs.htm
Then fortran, then lisp (''56?)
Though, I''d agree fortran was the first widely accepted language.
Anybody know objective-c? looks like fun stuff...
quote:Original post by DevLiquidKnight
I always wanted to use forthran but i never could find a free compiler
g77. Any *nix distro will have it.
quote:Original post by DevLiquidKnight
What is objective-c? I have never heard of this must understand must learn!
http://www.geom.umn.edu/software/w3kit/overview/objective-c.html
google is good
quote:Original post by DevLiquidKnight
What is objective-c? I have never heard of this must understand must learn!
And this forum thread.
Documents [ GDNet | MSDN | STL | OpenGL | Formats | RTFM | Asking Smart Questions ]
C++ Stuff [ MinGW | Loki | SDL | Boost. | STLport | FLTK | ACCU Recommended Books ]
quote:Original post by Anonymous Poster
If a new programming "language" come and let you "write" (may not even need to literally write/type) a complete app without writing loops, ifs, and also let you develop the app in much less time than c++, then it will likely to make c++ fade away. Of course recent IDEs and their wizards don''t count.
Even that wont cause C++ to fade away, that langauge would be better suited to things which arent games, because as you become more abstract you lose low level control of things, if that wasnt the case then alot more commerical games would be written in complied BASIC and not C and C++
imho, C and C++ will never go away, I think its a nice mid-point between the speed of pure assembler and the abstractness of things such as BASIC
This topic is closed to new replies.
Advertisement
Popular Topics
Advertisement
