• Announcements

    • khawk

      Download the Game Design and Indie Game Marketing Freebook   07/19/17

      GameDev.net and CRC Press have teamed up to bring a free ebook of content curated from top titles published by CRC Press. The freebook, Practices of Game Design & Indie Game Marketing, includes chapters from The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, and An Architectural Approach to Level Design. The GameDev.net FreeBook is relevant to game designers, developers, and those interested in learning more about the challenges in game development. We know game development can be a tough discipline and business, so we picked several chapters from CRC Press titles that we thought would be of interest to you, the GameDev.net audience, in your journey to design, develop, and market your next game. The free ebook is available through CRC Press by clicking here. The Curated Books The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, Second Edition, by Jesse Schell Presents 100+ sets of questions, or different lenses, for viewing a game’s design, encompassing diverse fields such as psychology, architecture, music, film, software engineering, theme park design, mathematics, anthropology, and more. Written by one of the world's top game designers, this book describes the deepest and most fundamental principles of game design, demonstrating how tactics used in board, card, and athletic games also work in video games. It provides practical instruction on creating world-class games that will be played again and again. View it here. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, by Joel Dreskin Marketing is an essential but too frequently overlooked or minimized component of the release plan for indie games. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing provides you with the tools needed to build visibility and sell your indie games. With special focus on those developers with small budgets and limited staff and resources, this book is packed with tangible recommendations and techniques that you can put to use immediately. As a seasoned professional of the indie game arena, author Joel Dreskin gives you insight into practical, real-world experiences of marketing numerous successful games and also provides stories of the failures. View it here. An Architectural Approach to Level Design This is one of the first books to integrate architectural and spatial design theory with the field of level design. The book presents architectural techniques and theories for level designers to use in their own work. It connects architecture and level design in different ways that address the practical elements of how designers construct space and the experiential elements of how and why humans interact with this space. Throughout the text, readers learn skills for spatial layout, evoking emotion through gamespaces, and creating better levels through architectural theory. View it here. Learn more and download the ebook by clicking here. Did you know? GameDev.net and CRC Press also recently teamed up to bring GDNet+ Members up to a 20% discount on all CRC Press books. Learn more about this and other benefits here.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

jairam

GT and Varcon Capitulate to Hasbro

1 post in this topic

GT and Varcon Capitulate to Hasbro http://www.dailyradar.com/news/game_news_2725.html The problem with Munch man and Maze man, is that the main character Pac man and also the ghosts look like the same as the orginal Atari’s characters. Only size or other little details could be different, but the expression look a like is the same. When the idea was the same, but the characters look a like was different there was no problem. So in this case a chase game like pac man is no problem, but the expression must be different. So the graphic look a like of characters, main objects etc. must be different, not the same. Am I right about what is mentioned in the article, this is what I understand about it? Is a breakout clone a legal problem in relation to the first orginal Atari’s Super Breakout? The game has of course a ball and bat, power ups. When it’s a problem it means that it isn’t possible to sell a breakout clone. Only Hasbro have the right to do so. What is meant by the expression, the graphic look a like? I don’t know about Atari’s Super Breakout graphics look a like, but my graphics are of another style, the modern style. And the graphics expression couldn’t be the same. Ball/Bat/Bricks/Background/Powerups are all of another style. What is your opinion?
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
"Graphic look-a-like" usually means that if someone didn''t know about the original art, when you place them side by side it would be difficult to decide what was the original OR if they were NOT markedly different

Mine are a layman''s terms not lawyer''s terms. There might be somewhere an actual "legal" definition in some law in some jurisdiction.

ZoomBoy
Developing a 2D RPG with skills, weapons, and adventure.
See my character editor, Tile editor, diary, 3D Art resources at
Check out my web-site
Also new links to combat flight sims
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites