Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

OpenGL Why no new OpenGL library in Windows.

This topic is 5476 days old which is more than the 365 day threshold we allow for new replies. Please post a new topic.

If you intended to correct an error in the post then please contact us.

Recommended Posts

Microsoft only delivered OpenGL 1.1 Version, now the only way to use the extensions of 1.2 or above version is to get the function''s address through wglGetProcAddress( .) and then call it. Since microsoft won''t deliver new version of OpenGL. Why the video card venders Not to deliver 1.2 , 1.3 , 1.4 version by themself like under Linux ? Calling through wglGetProcAddress(.) for every OpenGL Render Context is an annoying thing. I want the functions in the extension can be defined in complier time and only to test if it is valide to call when in runtime.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
there are libraries around that make dealing with extensions really easy. they call wglgetprocaddress for you automatically when you call an extension function; all you have to do is check for the presence of extensions.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Microsoft would rather see their own graphics API take over and this is one way to help them do just that.

See why they had the monopoly ruling now?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Then why vendors themself deliver new one?
Isn''t it possible to do such thing.?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
opengl32.dll is part of the operating system, not the video driver. video card vendors do their part: they expose the card''s capabilities through driver apis to the operating system (windows). it''s microsoft''s job to get those capabilities to the end user (you), and i imagine nvidia/ati aren''t too happy about implementing parts of the operating system.

additionally, opengl32.dll is covered by windows file protection, so even if you did write a new dll and put it on your computer, windows 2000/me/xp would''ve thrown it away anyway and replaced it with whatever opengl32.dll shipped with them and/or their service packs.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
So no one except Microsoft can overwrite OpenGL32.dll and OpenGL32.lib? I think I do''t consider so. If it was, then that is Microsoft is forbid us to do such thing.Microsoft has no such privilege. We can change anything we want except when to think over compatiblity. Why ARB don''t deliver new dlls per versions. Is that because of Microsoft holding the WGL extension? Though opengl32 is part of operating system, but should we must use that dll, why not have a 3rd dll, is it too difficult to do for ARB or does ARB think it is necessary?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I though Microsoft was member of the ARB? If so it''s even weirder why they don''t ship the latest versions.

Anyway, I agree with the statement that this is a marketing strategy of Microsoft. Obviously they are not going to promote a third party library if they have their own.
Are Microsoft now receiving priveledges for the use of commercial DirectX?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I just kno Ogl 2.0 is coming up . i can''t wait to see it :D .. i really DONT care if microsoft won''t have new dll under windows... there is one thing called PRODUCT QUALITY , by means of restricting their os to "only one graphic api" is not a good way to get custumers faith on their product. WeIrD !

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Anonymous Poster
Actually the reason for not being able to change opengl32.dll is they are trying to make the os more stable by not allowing 3rd party venders overwrite their "system" dll''s with one of their own. This was a big problem with win98. Now the thing is you cannot overwrite opengl32.dll BUT you can make a dll of your own and use it so opengl2.dll will go on your computer with no problems. In theory

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
quote:

I though Microsoft was member of the ARB? If so it''s even weirder why they don''t ship the latest versions.


Yeah, they are still a member of the ARB. Although there has been lots of discussion to throw them out recently. Which would be a Good Thing™

BTW, I''ve written a small lib that gives you full OpenGL 1.2/1.3/1.4 support under Windows. All you have to do is link it with your app, and include a new gl header. It will autoregister with the original opengl32.dll, and give you native support to the most recent OpenGL version your driver supports. It''s not a wrapper, so it doesn''t have any overhead. If someone is interested, I could upload it on my page.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sounds like a cool library Yann. I would be interested in trying it.

By the way, didn''t SGI upset Microsoft with their implementation, opengl.dll, on Windows, which acted like a "replacement" for opengl32.dll with ICD-mechanism and all?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I don''t understand it.
I have Win98SE, and installed the latest Nvidia drivers (latest at that time, about 3 months ago), and now my OpenGL version is 1.3
So, why does Microsoft have to implement it?

Height Map Editor | Eternal lands

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Yeah, mine is similar to Lev''s library, but more lightweight (Lev''s has a pretty huge header file) and compiles faster (it gives you OGL 1.4 core functionality, but doesn''t care about extension handling. You can use glext.h for that). I''ll up it tomorrow, so you can compare. It''s just a little convenience thing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Similar Content

    • By _OskaR
      Hi,
      I have an OpenGL application but without possibility to wite own shaders.
      I need to perform small VS modification - is possible to do it in an alternative way? Do we have apps or driver modifictions which will catch the shader sent to GPU and override it?
    • By xhcao
      Does sync be needed to read texture content after access texture image in compute shader?
      My simple code is as below,
      glUseProgram(program.get());
      glBindImageTexture(0, texture[0], 0, GL_FALSE, 3, GL_READ_ONLY, GL_R32UI);
      glBindImageTexture(1, texture[1], 0, GL_FALSE, 4, GL_WRITE_ONLY, GL_R32UI);
      glDispatchCompute(1, 1, 1);
      // Does sync be needed here?
      glUseProgram(0);
      glBindFramebuffer(GL_READ_FRAMEBUFFER, framebuffer);
      glFramebufferTexture2D(GL_READ_FRAMEBUFFER, GL_COLOR_ATTACHMENT0,
                                     GL_TEXTURE_CUBE_MAP_POSITIVE_X + face, texture[1], 0);
      glReadPixels(0, 0, kWidth, kHeight, GL_RED_INTEGER, GL_UNSIGNED_INT, outputValues);
       
      Compute shader is very simple, imageLoad content from texture[0], and imageStore content to texture[1]. Does need to sync after dispatchCompute?
    • By Jonathan2006
      My question: is it possible to transform multiple angular velocities so that they can be reinserted as one? My research is below:
      // This works quat quaternion1 = GEQuaternionFromAngleRadians(angleRadiansVector1); quat quaternion2 = GEMultiplyQuaternions(quaternion1, GEQuaternionFromAngleRadians(angleRadiansVector2)); quat quaternion3 = GEMultiplyQuaternions(quaternion2, GEQuaternionFromAngleRadians(angleRadiansVector3)); glMultMatrixf(GEMat4FromQuaternion(quaternion3).array); // The first two work fine but not the third. Why? quat quaternion1 = GEQuaternionFromAngleRadians(angleRadiansVector1); vec3 vector1 = GETransformQuaternionAndVector(quaternion1, angularVelocity1); quat quaternion2 = GEQuaternionFromAngleRadians(angleRadiansVector2); vec3 vector2 = GETransformQuaternionAndVector(quaternion2, angularVelocity2); // This doesn't work //quat quaternion3 = GEQuaternionFromAngleRadians(angleRadiansVector3); //vec3 vector3 = GETransformQuaternionAndVector(quaternion3, angularVelocity3); vec3 angleVelocity = GEAddVectors(vector1, vector2); // Does not work: vec3 angleVelocity = GEAddVectors(vector1, GEAddVectors(vector2, vector3)); static vec3 angleRadiansVector; vec3 angularAcceleration = GESetVector(0.0, 0.0, 0.0); // Sending it through one angular velocity later in my motion engine angleVelocity = GEAddVectors(angleVelocity, GEMultiplyVectorAndScalar(angularAcceleration, timeStep)); angleRadiansVector = GEAddVectors(angleRadiansVector, GEMultiplyVectorAndScalar(angleVelocity, timeStep)); glMultMatrixf(GEMat4FromEulerAngle(angleRadiansVector).array); Also how do I combine multiple angularAcceleration variables? Is there an easier way to transform the angular values?
    • By dpadam450
      I have this code below in both my vertex and fragment shader, however when I request glGetUniformLocation("Lights[0].diffuse") or "Lights[0].attenuation", it returns -1. It will only give me a valid uniform location if I actually use the diffuse/attenuation variables in the VERTEX shader. Because I use position in the vertex shader, it always returns a valid uniform location. I've read that I can share uniforms across both vertex and fragment, but I'm confused what this is even compiling to if this is the case.
       
      #define NUM_LIGHTS 2
      struct Light
      {
          vec3 position;
          vec3 diffuse;
          float attenuation;
      };
      uniform Light Lights[NUM_LIGHTS];
       
       
    • By pr033r
      Hello,
      I have a Bachelor project on topic "Implenet 3D Boid's algorithm in OpenGL". All OpenGL issues works fine for me, all rendering etc. But when I started implement the boid's algorithm it was getting worse and worse. I read article (http://natureofcode.com/book/chapter-6-autonomous-agents/) inspirate from another code (here: https://github.com/jyanar/Boids/tree/master/src) but it still doesn't work like in tutorials and videos. For example the main problem: when I apply Cohesion (one of three main laws of boids) it makes some "cycling knot". Second, when some flock touch to another it scary change the coordination or respawn in origin (x: 0, y:0. z:0). Just some streng things. 
      I followed many tutorials, change a try everything but it isn't so smooth, without lags like in another videos. I really need your help. 
      My code (optimalizing branch): https://github.com/pr033r/BachelorProject/tree/Optimalizing
      Exe file (if you want to look) and models folder (for those who will download the sources):
      http://leteckaposta.cz/367190436
      Thanks for any help...

  • Popular Now