This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


OpenGL opengl and side scrolling

Recommended Posts

I''m trying to make a program that follows a character centered on the main screen using openGL. My initial idea was to use glTranslate to move the screen axis based on how much the character moves. But for some reason this doesn''t work. Also, the game is 2D, so there is only x and y axis movement. Is there an easier way to make the screen move?

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
glTranslate should work! both in perspective or in orthogonal mode..

its the simplest and fastest(in a simple 2d tile/billboard scroller) to move stuff with opengl!

Other methods would require you to recalc every vertex you send to OGL every frame ,if CPU power dont is a problem, this should be as fast as glTranslate (if you send every vertex to OGL every frame anyway), but then you talk about simplicity, and glTranslate wins again!

If you have a advanced culling method, you might need to do some calculations even if you use glTranslate, and simplicity might fall as a argument, but why not create a method, based on that you use glTranslate!( = fast and simple)

look it up, and learn it well! its the best and simplest way! (for a simple 2d tile/billboard scroller)

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
My OpenGL class at in the DevZone includes a method for calculating 3D coordinates from 2D coordinates. I prefer doing it that way since I still want pespective. The method just gives me an easier way to specify where to start drawing.


Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
i don''t see where in your opengl class ( ?) is that method

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
Since my 3D to 2D methods are apparently not in the version I released, here it is.

GLvoid oglClass::SetTranslate2D(float x, float y, float z)

GLvoid oglClass::ReSizeGLScene(GLsizei width, GLsizei height)
if (height==0)



// Calculate The Aspect Ratio Of The Window




The equations I use must use the gluPerspective settings I use above. xration and yratio are then applied to any shapes you want to remain the same number of pixels regardless of the resolution the user sets.

With the above 1 unit is 256 pixels so you can draw your primitives accordingly.

My OpenGL class will be rereleased some time in the future with MD2 model support and a particle system and whatever else I need for my current project.


KalvinB - (to Jessika) do you accept Jesus as your lord and savior

Jessika - Sure I can accept all forms of payment.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
    • Total Posts
  • Similar Content

    • By DelicateTreeFrog
      Hello! As an exercise for delving into modern OpenGL, I'm creating a simple .obj renderer. I want to support things like varying degrees of specularity, geometry opacity, things like that, on a per-material basis. Different materials can also have different textures. Basic .obj necessities. I've done this in old school OpenGL, but modern OpenGL has its own thing going on, and I'd like to conform as closely to the standards as possible so as to keep the program running correctly, and I'm hoping to avoid picking up bad habits this early on.
      Reading around on the OpenGL Wiki, one tip in particular really stands out to me on this page:
      For something like a renderer for .obj files, this sort of thing seems almost ideal, but according to the wiki, it's a bad idea. Interesting to note!
      So, here's what the plan is so far as far as loading goes:
      Set up a type for materials so that materials can be created and destroyed. They will contain things like diffuse color, diffuse texture, geometry opacity, and so on, for each material in the .mtl file. Since .obj files are conveniently split up by material, I can load different groups of vertices/normals/UVs and triangles into different blocks of data for different models. When it comes to the rendering, I get a bit lost. I can either:
      Between drawing triangle groups, call glUseProgram to use a different shader for that particular geometry (so a unique shader just for the material that is shared by this triangle group). or
      Between drawing triangle groups, call glUniform a few times to adjust different parameters within the "master shader", such as specularity, diffuse color, and geometry opacity. In both cases, I still have to call glBindTexture between drawing triangle groups in order to bind the diffuse texture used by the material, so there doesn't seem to be a way around having the CPU do *something* during the rendering process instead of letting the GPU do everything all at once.
      The second option here seems less cluttered, however. There are less shaders to keep up with while one "master shader" handles it all. I don't have to duplicate any code or compile multiple shaders. Arguably, I could always have the shader program for each material be embedded in the material itself, and be auto-generated upon loading the material from the .mtl file. But this still leads to constantly calling glUseProgram, much more than is probably necessary in order to properly render the .obj. There seem to be a number of differing opinions on if it's okay to use hundreds of shaders or if it's best to just use tens of shaders.
      So, ultimately, what is the "right" way to do this? Does using a "master shader" (or a few variants of one) bog down the system compared to using hundreds of shader programs each dedicated to their own corresponding materials? Keeping in mind that the "master shaders" would have to track these additional uniforms and potentially have numerous branches of ifs, it may be possible that the ifs will lead to additional and unnecessary processing. But would that more expensive than constantly calling glUseProgram to switch shaders, or storing the shaders to begin with?
      With all these angles to consider, it's difficult to come to a conclusion. Both possible methods work, and both seem rather convenient for their own reasons, but which is the most performant? Please help this beginner/dummy understand. Thank you!
    • By JJCDeveloper
      I want to make professional java 3d game with server program and database,packet handling for multiplayer and client-server communicating,maps rendering,models,and stuffs Which aspect of java can I learn and where can I learn java Lwjgl OpenGL rendering Like minecraft and world of tanks
    • By AyeRonTarpas
      A friend of mine and I are making a 2D game engine as a learning experience and to hopefully build upon the experience in the long run.

      -What I'm using:
          C++;. Since im learning this language while in college and its one of the popular language to make games with why not.     Visual Studios; Im using a windows so yea.     SDL or GLFW; was thinking about SDL since i do some research on it where it is catching my interest but i hear SDL is a huge package compared to GLFW, so i may do GLFW to start with as learning since i may get overwhelmed with SDL.  
      Knowing what we want in the engine what should our main focus be in terms of learning. File managements, with headers, functions ect. How can i properly manage files with out confusing myself and my friend when sharing code. Alternative to Visual studios: My friend has a mac and cant properly use Vis studios, is there another alternative to it?  
    • By ferreiradaselva
      Both functions are available since 3.0, and I'm currently using `glMapBuffer()`, which works fine.
      But, I was wondering if anyone has experienced advantage in using `glMapBufferRange()`, which allows to specify the range of the mapped buffer. Could this be only a safety measure or does it improve performance?
      Note: I'm not asking about glBufferSubData()/glBufferData. Those two are irrelevant in this case.
    • By xhcao
      Before using void glBindImageTexture(    GLuint unit, GLuint texture, GLint level, GLboolean layered, GLint layer, GLenum access, GLenum format), does need to make sure that texture is completeness. 
  • Popular Now