• Announcements

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Should i upgrade from MSVC++ 6 to MSVC++ .Net 2003

Recommended Posts

i hear it''s faster... is it worth it?

Share on other sites
Is your code running too slowly right now?

How appropriate. You fight like a cow.

I like it better

Share on other sites
How should I know?

I use VC++ 6 and it works fine, so its your choice.

I haven''t tried VC++ .NET yet

Share on other sites
.net conforms better to the C++ standard and I've heard it has a faster standard library. I say upgrade. Get me a copy, too.
EDIT: If you have the money, that is...
If you will have to eat nothing but potatos for a month to afford it, then it is not worth it.

[edited by - GaulerTheGoat on May 7, 2003 11:03:05 PM]

Share on other sites
I dont use managed code, ugg the framework. But I still create the MFC. The additions to fomr creations and what not is less tedious as compared to vc 6. I use the dx 9 wizard that comes with it for getting started faster

You can get it free on the net

Share on other sites
The reasons I''m waiting for 2003 academic to come out eagerly... (I still use VC6)

Faster code because of an advance optimizer.
An awesome runtime debugger (this is what I''ve heard anyway)
A sweet new IDE.
Better standards compliance (has to be a good thing)

And probably alot more... SIMD instructions or some such (dont know the acronym lol) for p3 and higher...

Share on other sites
quote:
Original post by GaulerTheGoat
.net conforms better to the C++ standard and I've heard it has a faster standard library. I say upgrade. Get me a copy, too.
EDIT: If you have the money, that is...
If you will have to eat nothing but potatos for a month to afford it, then it is not worth it.

Many schools have deals set up with Microsoft which lets teachers give out academic editions of the software package for free. This is how I got my copy.

quote:
Original post by Illumini Does anyone know when an Academic version of .NET 2k3 will be released?

[EDIT] And yes, .NET is worth the upgrade. The only real pain in the ass is upgrading all your VBX projects to VB.NET.

- Rob Loach
Current Project: Go Through Object-Oriented Programming in C++ by Robert Lafore

"Do or do not. There is no try."
- Yoda

[edited by - Rob Loach on May 8, 2003 12:10:28 PM]

Matt would you care to give me a link to the $100 Academic version of 2k3 on MS site? I haven''t been able to find it Share this post Link to post Share on other sites quote: Many schools have deals set up with Microsoft which lets teachers give out academic editions of the software package for free. This is how I got my copy. Wow! Really? I hope this is true I''ll be going to college this fall; hopefully I can get my hands on a copy Share this post Link to post Share on other sites i''m going for the HTML... MSVC++ .NET 2003 for$100

...that''s not the acidemic price, and it''s \$109...

Share on other sites
quote:
Original post by Rob Loach
And yes, .NET is worth the upgrade. The only real pain in the ass is upgrading all your VBX projects to VB.NET.
Agreed! For other than simple little programs, the wizard they included is virtually worthless since the language is so totally different! It''s especially bad if your projects are using third party controls. Luckily everything I''m working on is from scratch.

Share on other sites
Ah I was trying to get a hold of the whole 2k3 .NEt package, the Standard C++ Only editions don''t offer the proffesional level code optimizer that the full .NET Pro/Enterprise or Academic version do.

Share on other sites
it does...it just doesn''t support other languages...

Share on other sites
Wow, I was under impression standard C++ didn''t have same quality debugger (maybe this was under 2002? and they added it with 2003?)

Either way now I face a new dilema. I could go out and buy C++ 2003, which is what I really use. But I wouldn''t mind having VB.net nad C# to mess with hehe. So I still have to decide whether to wait it out on an Academic version.

On MS Product support page they have VS.net 2003 Academic listed. I guess I should call up one of the places around here that is supposed to sell Academic editions and sede if they have it yet

Share on other sites
hey,

Is .net easier than C++ 6.0? or close to the same? what are the differences?

Share on other sites
I''d suggest the standard edition for new-comers to any Visual products unless (you have a fairly good VS book to refer to) || (you have used VS6).

• Forum Statistics

• Total Topics
627711
• Total Posts
2978744

• 21
• 14
• 12
• 36
• 30