Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Problem with basic collision response

This topic is 5485 days old which is more than the 365 day threshold we allow for new replies. Please post a new topic.

Recommended Posts

I have a book in which they give me the formula for 100% elastic collision, but when I test it I don''t get the same results as the author, so I''m wondering if he made a mistake in the example. It''s about an object A that collides with an object B(pasted from the book): ma = 2 kg mb = 3 kg vai (initial velocity of A) = 4 m/s vbi (initial velocity of B)= -2 m/s vaf (final velocity of A) = (2*mb *vbi + vai *(ma – mb ))/(ma + mb ) vbf (final velocity of B= (2*ma *vai - vbi *(ma – mb ))/(ma + mb ) vaf = (2*3*(-2) + 4*(2 – 3))/(2 + 3) = (2*mb *vbi + vai *(ma – mb ))/(ma + mb ) = 1.6 m/s vbf = (2*ma *vai - vbi *(ma – mb ))/(ma + mb ) = (2*2*4 – (-2)*(2 – 3))/(2 + 3) = 2.4 m/s Is the formula correct? Help a newb, skip church for 3 months.

Share on other sites
The formulas are fine. You''ve just made some errors in your calculations.

Share on other sites
ok so the results above are correct? I guess I''ll just quadruple check again.

Share on other sites
both results are incorrect.

Share on other sites
ma = 2 kg
mb = 3 kg
vai = 4 m/s
vbi = -2 m/s

vaf = (2*mb *vbi + vai *(ma – mb ))/(ma + mb)
= ( 2*3*(-2) + 4*(2-3) )/( 2+3 )
= ( -12 - 4 ) / 5
= -16/5
= -3.2 m/s

vbf = (2*ma *vai - vbi *(ma – mb ))/(ma + mb)
= ( 2*2*4 - (-2)*(2-3) )/( 2+3 )
= ( 16 - 2 ) / 5
= 14 / 5
= 2.8 m/s

momentum before = 2*4 + 3*(-2)
= 8 - 6
= 2 kgm/s

momentum after = 2*(-3.2) + 3*2.8
= -6.4 + 8.4
= 2 kgm/s

kinetic energy before = 1/2*ma*vai^2 + 1/2*mb*vbi^2
= 1/2*2*4^2 + 1/2*3*(-2)^2
= 16 + 6
= 22 J

kinetic energy after = 1/2*ma*vaf^2 + 1/2*mb*vbf^2
= 1/2*2*(-3.2)^2 + 1/2*3*(2.8)^2
= 10.24 + 11.76
= 22 J

Share on other sites
I apologize for thinking your "(pasted from the book)" applied only to the formulas, not the calculations below them. My "You''ve just made some errors in your calculations" should have been "whoever did those calculations made some errors".

The formulas are still fine though.

Share on other sites
Ahhh, thanks a lot. I had arrived at your results but I thought I was crasy

1. 1
Rutin
18
2. 2
3. 3
JoeJ
13
4. 4
5. 5

• 16
• 18
• 10
• 13
• 17
• Forum Statistics

• Total Topics
631694
• Total Posts
3001747
×