Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

benjamin bunny

OpenGL What happened to OpenGL.org?

Recommended Posts

davepermen    1047
yeah, its offline now for more than 24hours, i think.. hm.. possibly more, possibly less..

well.. 99% is perfect, except when it comes to stability :D

"take a look around" - limp bizkit
www.google.com

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Anthony Serrano    3285
I''m guessing the servers went down and, it being Labor Day weekend here in the states, no one is around to get them up and running again. If it''s not up again by about 7:00 PM UTC on September 2nd, we may have reason to worry.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Anonymous Poster   
Guest Anonymous Poster
"Id say the same thing that happed to my TAFE and thousands of home & business computers - the W32.blaster.worm"

I like to think that opengl.org doesn''t use windows. but, i dont recall anything on their site saying what OS they run, so who knows.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
KalvinB    102
"I like to think that opengl.org doesn''t use windows."

Considering all anyone needs to do to be immune to pretty much every Windows virus and exploit is to run a router and antivirus software, running Linux is a waste of effort.

In order to compromise IcarusIndie.com which is logged in as an admin on Win2K, you''d have to exploit Open Source software.

If they were dumb enough to leave port 135 pointed at a Windows box then they wouldn''t be running OpenGL.org. You can''t be that retarded and run a major web-site.

It was probably just a hardware failure of sorts.

You can always call Tony at 415-865-0645. Considering he''s the admin assist he should know.

Ben


[ IcarusIndie.com | recycledrussianbrides.com ]


Will Post For Food

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
quote:
Original post by KalvinB
Considering all anyone needs to do to be immune to pretty much every Windows virus and exploit is to run a router and antivirus software, running Linux is a waste of effort.



I *HAD* to reply to this. This shows how little you know about Linux for one. Linux is a thousand times more stable and can outlast Windows by literal years without rebooting. My record was just under two years on a dual P200 running Debian. Now before you GUI-kiddies scream your lungs out, I am talking Linux here. Did you EVER hear me mention X-Win? No. X-Win is ***NOT*** Linux. X-Win is a GUI application that REQUIRES Linux to run, and then acts as a newbie "point and click" interface to Linux. It is to Linux what Windows 3.11 was to DOS. People who buy whole computers and slap X-Win on them and attempt to run servers WOULD be better off with Windows2K. However, make sure you specify this critical point. I have two Debian Linux boxes beside me, one running a TF1.5 dedicated server and the other running my FTP server. Both have been up without reboot since January. The specs on both are extremely low (TF is a Celeron333, FTP is a P200), yet the TF box runs better than most TF servers hosted on 600 and 700MHz boxes because I run Linux, which means, shell-only. It''s something like a 73mb install plus the TF server.

Anyways, Linux is far more secure, stable, and powerful than Windows any day. X-Win isn''t, but a true Linux box contains a mobo, CPU, RAM, hard-drive, and ethernet card (or some communication device). That''s all mine have. Installing video cards for monitors and such would slow the boxes down. So when''s the last time you installed Win2K from the M$ site without any floppies or CDs? Even then, how did you control your installation and box afterwards, eh? SSH2 baby.

-The Great Sephiroth

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
KalvinB    102
blah blah blah

You''d be better off throwing Win98 on those systems and donating them to charity so they can be put to good use.

No duh a dedicated system is going to run faster than a general purpose one. Did you actually think you were forming some great point?

"and then acts as a newbie "point and click" interface to Linux"

Yes. Real nerds wittle away hours and hours doing things that have no excuse for not being a simple point and click. Why click "send" when you can fire up telnet and do

telnet www.gamedev.net
etc etc etc

Only luser noobies use browsers.

.bow oh great sephiroth

How may I turn my $1000 system into such a worthless brick as you have that it may run Team Fortress as gloriously?

Ben


[ IcarusIndie.com | recycledrussianbrides.com ]


Will Post For Food

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
marijnh    182
Before this thread turns into a completely geeky fight between linux fanboys and linux haters... Does anyone know a mirror containing a recent version of the GLUT source code? I need it but google only keeps pointing me at opengl.org, which does not help much at the moment.

Marijn

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
stephanh    174
http://www.xmission.com/~nate/glut.html

It''s the windows version, but right below the binary there''s a source package, perhaps it builds on your system of choice.

Perhaps there are again power supply problems in the country of the unlimited possibilities.


regards
Stephan


eisscholle.de

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
marijnh    182
Thanks i was looking for the source code and i could get it from that site.
Power failure sounds like a credible explanation for the server probs, but i''m going to blame it on the microsoft mafia

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Wudan    211
quote:
Original post by stephanh
http://www.xmission.com/~nate/glut.html

It''s the windows version, but right below the binary there''s a source package, perhaps it builds on your system of choice.

Perhaps there are again power supply problems in the country of the unlimited possibilities.


regards
Stephan


eisscholle.de


Seeing as how OpenGL.org is hosted in California, I doubt that the power problems of 2 or so weeks ago in the Eastern US and Canada would have an effect on OpenGl.org.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
That just shows how far above your head I went with my statements. Let me re-phrase this for the small-minded. Linus is *NOT* a client-OS. If you''re using Linux to to do regular client things, with or without X-Win, you haven''t a clue of it''s usage or full potential. Client-side stuff NEEDS to be done in Windows, which is what it was designed for. Server-side things such as web-servers, email-servers, and almost anything else should be done in Linux or Unix. I fully agree that for sending emails and browsing the web, a GUI is the way to go. I mis-took you for talking about server applications. Apparently you''re one of those newbies who thinks of Linux as just another OS to point and click your way around in to do the same things you do in Windows, which is incorrect. Why do you think, for so MANY years, the real back-bone of the internet was run on Unix and later Linux? Stability, power, performance. Up until NT came out, there wasn''t much that Windows could do to even hold a candle to the *nix OSes. It is only now with Windows2K that the Windows servers are about on level ground with *nix servers running X-Win, but the real servers, the ones with just the shell, still out-do even the 2K servers with ease.

I''m not some Linux loving geek. I have Windows XP Home on this box and 98SE on four of my other boxes. All are custom-built by me. I run Linux for my SERVER processes though, because it performs better, requires MUCH less hardware which means much lower cost of building the server, and I can access the boxes from anywhere LAN-side using SSH2. Not to mention I don''t have to worry about rebooting them once every month or two like I would with 2K. Yes, I use and code for Windows, but I also code for Linux. Each OS has it''s purpose. Using one for the wrong purpose DOES make it suck. So to your comment about sending emails in the Linux shell, yes, it is a total waste of time. But then again, if you have installed Linux for it''s design-purpose, you won''t have an email client installed.

-The Great Sephiroth

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Tac-Tics    197
Linux sucks because it''s too damn hard to *get* running.

Windows sucks because it''s too damn hard to *keep* it running.



/¯\_/¯\_/¯\_/¯\_/¯\_/¯\
"You TK''ed my chicken!"
\_/¯\_/¯\_/¯\_/¯\_/¯\_/

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
KalvinB    102
"That just shows how far above your head I went with my statements."

Just goes to show how full of yourself you are.

"I''m not some Linux loving geek."

Perhaps then just an egomaniacal geek who bases his entire self worth on his ability to waste time doing things could just as well be automated.

"Windows sucks because it''s too damn hard to *keep* it running."

Only if you buy a POS system (read: Gateway, HP, Dell, etc). I havn''t had issues with Windows since I started building my own systems about 4 or 5 years ago. IcarusIndie.com ran on WinMe for awhile without a hitch. I moved up to Win2K because I heard it was better and because I wanted to use IIS. And WinME didn''t like having 2 network cards which made it difficult to do connection sharing (I''ve since gotten a router). IIS lasted even less long than Linux on my system (a few hours vs maybe 5). IIS only made it live because I didn''t have a second system running the server. Linux never made it live. I had it running a second copy of the site internally for all of about 30 minutes before formatting it and putting Windows back on.

Ben


[ IcarusIndie.com | recycledrussianbrides.com ]


Will Post For Food

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
PurpleAmethyst    335
The Great Sephiroth: Do you actually want people to use linux or not. That kind of stuff is just going to scare people who want to migrate to Linux. You have good points I''m not not denying that.Linux is useful if you want to use a few old systems for specific tasks. But it''s still nice to have a GUI when your getting used to it. As you get used to linux you do tend to leave X behind anyway. Linux has its merits as a Desktop OS too.

One example where Linux is useful if you have a GUI AND a server running. My friend runs a net cafe, has a network server running Linux, which he uses to admin everything as well. Okay the network stuff runs in the background but all the admin is useful on to have a GUI for. Combine them both and it becomes even more powerful.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Anonymous Poster   
Guest Anonymous Poster
Oh Linux Preachers Unite! Down is the spawn of satan Bily Gates and his evil empire, run by his minions.


Linux, Linux I love you so,
I just have to let the windows users know.
That Linux is the one true OS for all,
Where you can compile your own kernal and more (whoopee)!

Little Linux penguin your a ray of light,
Make the night shine with X-Win bright,
So the windows budgies can use "point and click",
And feel right at home with a useless brick.

I use the console because I''m a real computer geek,
I have an inferiority complex about being a Linux freak.
I preach the Linux word so others may see,
That they too can build their own custom kernal and GCC.
(rather than coding a game that would be worth anything!)

Now I have nothing against Linux or windows (but I *hate* M$ for their business practices!) or any other OS. One thing that I am completely sick of is the Linux Preacher! However, I do love watching them ark up over a computer OS

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • Similar Content

    • By pseudomarvin
      I assumed that if a shader is computationally expensive then the execution is just slower. But running the following GLSL FS instead just crashes
      void main() { float x = 0; float y = 0; int sum = 0; for (float x = 0; x < 10; x += 0.00005) { for (float y = 0; y < 10; y += 0.00005) { sum++; } } fragColor = vec4(1, 1, 1 , 1.0); } with unhandled exception in nvoglv32.dll. Are there any hard limits on the number of steps/time that a shader can take before it is shut down? I was thinking about implementing some time intensive computation in shaders where it would take on the order of seconds to compute a frame, is that possible? Thanks.
    • By Arulbabu Donbosco
      There are studios selling applications which is just copying any 3Dgraphic content and regenerating into another new window. especially for CAVE Virtual reality experience. so that the user opens REvite or CAD or any other 3D applications and opens a model. then when the user selects the rendered window the VR application copies the 3D model information from the OpenGL window. 
      I got the clue that the VR application replaces the windows opengl32.dll file. how this is possible ... how can we copy the 3d content from the current OpenGL window.
      anyone, please help me .. how to go further... to create an application like VR CAVE. 
       
      Thanks
    • By cebugdev
      hi all,

      i am trying to build an OpenGL 2D GUI system, (yeah yeah, i know i should not be re inventing the wheel, but this is for educational and some other purpose only),
      i have built GUI system before using 2D systems such as that of HTML/JS canvas, but in 2D system, i can directly match a mouse coordinates to the actual graphic coordinates with additional computation for screen size/ratio/scale ofcourse.
      now i want to port it to OpenGL, i know that to render a 2D object in OpenGL we specify coordiantes in Clip space or use the orthographic projection, now heres what i need help about.
      1. what is the right way of rendering the GUI? is it thru drawing in clip space or switching to ortho projection?
      2. from screen coordinates (top left is 0,0 nd bottom right is width height), how can i map the mouse coordinates to OpenGL 2D so that mouse events such as button click works? In consideration ofcourse to the current screen/size dimension.
      3. when let say if the screen size/dimension is different, how to handle this? in my previous javascript 2D engine using canvas, i just have my working coordinates and then just perform the bitblk or copying my working canvas to screen canvas and scale the mouse coordinates from there, in OpenGL how to work on a multiple screen sizes (more like an OpenGL ES question).
      lastly, if you guys know any books, resources, links or tutorials that handle or discuss this, i found one with marekknows opengl game engine website but its not free,
      Just let me know. Did not have any luck finding resource in google for writing our own OpenGL GUI framework.
      IF there are no any available online, just let me know, what things do i need to look into for OpenGL and i will study them one by one to make it work.
      thank you, and looking forward to positive replies.
    • By fllwr0491
      I have a few beginner questions about tesselation that I really have no clue.
      The opengl wiki doesn't seem to talk anything about the details.
       
      What is the relationship between TCS layout out and TES layout in?
      How does the tesselator know how control points are organized?
          e.g. If TES input requests triangles, but TCS can output N vertices.
             What happens in this case?
      In this article,
      http://www.informit.com/articles/article.aspx?p=2120983
      the isoline example TCS out=4, but TES in=isoline.
      And gl_TessCoord is only a single one.
      So which ones are the control points?
      How are tesselator building primitives?
    • By Orella
      I've been developing a 2D Engine using SFML + ImGui.
      Here you can see an image
      The editor is rendered using ImGui and the scene window is a sf::RenderTexture where I draw the GameObjects and then is converted to ImGui::Image to render it in the editor.
      Now I need to create a 3D Engine during this year in my Bachelor Degree but using SDL2 + ImGui and I want to recreate what I did with the 2D Engine. 
      I've managed to render the editor like I did in the 2D Engine using this example that comes with ImGui. 
      3D Editor preview
      But I don't know how to create an equivalent of sf::RenderTexture in SDL2, so I can draw the 3D scene there and convert it to ImGui::Image to show it in the editor.
      If you can provide code will be better. And if you want me to provide any specific code tell me.
      Thanks!
  • Popular Now