Oh... that's not where the problem was - you'd already done that (nm)
All you have to adjust, to get a 30x10 size heightmap in there is, in the defines:
#define MAP_SIZE 1024 // Size Of Our .RAW Height Map ( NEW )#define STEP_SIZE 16 // Width And Height Of Each Quad ( NEW )#define HEIGHT_RATIO 1.5f
change the stuff to something like
#define MAP_WIDTH 30#define MAP_HEIGHT 10#define STEP_SIZE 1 // Width And Height Of Each Quad ( NEW )#define HEIGHT_RATIO 0.125f //just picking a value that should work ok with your data
this line
BYTE g_HeightMap[MAP_SIZE*MAP_SIZE];
becomes:
BYTE g_HeightMap[MAP_WIDTH*MAP_HEIGHT];
This section
int Height(BYTE *pHeightMap, int X, int Y) // This Returns The Height From A Height Map Index{ int x = X % MAP_SIZE; // Error Check Our x Value int y = Y % MAP_SIZE; // Error Check Our y Value if(!pHeightMap) return 0; // Make Sure Our Data Is Valid
becomes
int Height(BYTE *pHeightMap, int X, int Y) // This Returns The Height From A Height Map Index{ int x = X % MAP_WIDTH; // Error Check Our x Value int y = Y % MAP_HEIGHT; // Error Check Our y Value if(!pHeightMap) return 0; // Make Sure Our Data Is Valid
This line:
return pHeightMap[x + (y * MAP_SIZE)];
Becomes
return pHeightMap[x + (y * MAP_WIDTH)];
(YES, it is multiplied by WIDTH, not a typo)
and finally
this section
for ( X = 0; X < (MAP_SIZE-STEP_SIZE); X += STEP_SIZE ) for ( Y = 0; Y < (MAP_SIZE-STEP_SIZE); Y += STEP_SIZE )
becomes
for ( X = 0; X < (MAP_WIDTH-STEP_SIZE); X += STEP_SIZE ) for ( Y = 0; Y < (MAP_HEIGHT-STEP_SIZE); Y += STEP_SIZE )
Is that all you needed? (You could have figured that out
)
-Michael
(EDIT: put in the right numbers for width and height so not to confuse anyone.)
[edited by - thr33d on November 13, 2003 12:19:36 PM]
not the actual data)
1000 1100 1200 1280 1256 1201.......
these values represent depths in meters each "point" is spaced out by 150 meters. so starting at 0,0,0, the first point would be (0, 1000, 0)then the next would be (150, 1100, 0). i am wanting to make a 3D represent of this, i.e. a heightmap and was wondering how different this data is from the data in the RAW file that was explained in lesson 34.
-- also with these numbers being massive what is the easiest way to scale down my coordinate system but at the same time still seeing a significant different in depth values at different points. thanks and i hope i have been clear. 
--btw i am using this to try to make up some sort of land mass for a game i am working with. thanks again in advance!
