Jump to content
  • Advertisement


This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


.Net forms, controls, threading

This topic is 5312 days old which is more than the 365 day threshold we allow for new replies. Please post a new topic.

If you intended to correct an error in the post then please contact us.

Recommended Posts

(Just started learning C#, .Net, Forms.) I have a form with a custom PictureBox (i.e inherited from PictureBox), with a new method Transition(). In Transition I hand the work off to a work thread and return immediately so the UI doesn''t hang. In the work thread I draw on PictureBox.Image and call PictureBox.Invalidate() in a finite loop to see the results as they occur. I kept getting a "The object is currently in use elsewhere." prompt and a break on the PictureBox.Image object or it''s associated Graphics object and have come to find out that controls should not be manipulated in threads other than the ones that created them. That''s the dilemma. So instead of calling this.Invalidate after drawing on this.Image (this being my custom PictureBox), I did this.Draw(), Draw() being the following:
delegate void HelperDelegate();

private void Draw()
	if (this.InvokeRequired)
		this.Invoke(new HelperDelegate(this.Draw));
...but I still get the same problem when accessing Image, which means that I can''t touch any part of PictureBox within the work thread, even Image, which you would think is equivalent to any other memory bitmap, but I guess PictureBox tries to access it over in the main thread from time to time to update itself while I''m drawing on it. This makes asynchronous drawing in another thread very very difficult. Does anyone have any suggestions? The only thing I can think of is that I should run the message pump in the drawing loop all in the main thread... though I''m not quite sure how to manually call the message pump using Forms... :/ Thanks in advance to anyone who can help. ------------ - outRider -

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
i havent used C# or even any other of the .NET languages but i supose you could solve that problem using a timer control.

in longhorn.msdn.microsoft.com i got this info:

system.windows.forms.timer is a control that will make something (a method for example) happen in X time.

so imagine this:

Timer *t = new Timer;
t.set_Interval( 50 ); //you can set it to how may milisecs you want

t.add_Tick( new EventHandler( this, &class.method ) );

you just pass by reference (if C# accept it, i dont know) the method you want to be executed apart from the main one.

it will be executed once every 50milisecs.

if you just want it to be executed once you can set it off with:

t.set_Enabled( false );

in that way you can make something without causing the UI to hang.

i hope ive been helpful, any question ill try to answer it.

[edited by - a2ps on January 3, 2004 12:36:20 AM]

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
That won''t work if my animation is slow (not that it is) because it will still hang the UI for as long as it takes to execute.

I seem to have found a fix. Instead of drawing to PictureBox.Image I draw to another Bitmap. Then I copy that to Image and Invalidate() after calling Invoke and switching to the main thread.

- outRider -

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
Hey, I just read about this issue last night. According to Tom Miller, who wrote MDX, controls can only properly be accessed by the thread that they were created in. Otherwise Bad Things can happen. So if you''ve got a multithreaded app, you have to have some kind of callback(s) in the thread that created the picturebox that manipulate the Image data.

So if I were trying to transition between two images, I would load local copies of both in the worker thread, and then invoke the callback on the picturebox thread whenever a new frame was completed, so that it could update the picturebox image.

Now, I don''t understand threading in C# very well, and I don''t really understand how Invoke works, so I apologize if this isn''t too helpful. But I think you want to use the asychronous invoke call - BeginInvoke(). I''ve never used it, so the best I can give is this code snippet from my MDX book:

Here, the author is updating the text of an editbox control on the GUI thread from a message handler thread:

private void OnDataReceive(object sender, ReceiveEventsArgs e)
string newtext = "New Player ID: " + e.Message.SenderID.ToString();
this.BeginInvoke(new AddTextCallback(AddText), new object[] { newtext });

Sorry, I can''t illuminate the nature of the funky syntax :-(, and I''ve never posted code before so I might have used the wrong tag.

Let be be finale of seem, seems to me.



Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Advertisement

Important Information

By using GameDev.net, you agree to our community Guidelines, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.

We are the game development community.

Whether you are an indie, hobbyist, AAA developer, or just trying to learn, GameDev.net is the place for you to learn, share, and connect with the games industry. Learn more About Us or sign up!

Sign me up!