Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

strahan

OpenGL OpenGL -> DirectX 9 Conversion

Recommended Posts

strahan    121
Help! I am trying to convert an OpenGL implementation into DirectX 9. I am getting screwed up results when converting the following triangle rendering code: OpenGL:
glColor3f(1, 1, 1);

// Output the LEFT VERTEX for the triangle

glVertex3f((GLfloat) leftX,(GLfloat) leftZ,(GLfloat) leftY );

glColor3f(1, 1, 1);

// Output the RIGHT VERTEX for the triangle

glVertex3f((GLfloat) rightX, (GLfloat) rightZ, (GLfloat) rightY );

glColor3f(1, 1, 1);

// Output the APEX VERTEX for the triangle

glVertex3f((GLfloat) apexX,(GLfloat) apexZ,(GLfloat) apexY );
 
DirectX 9:
   
CUSTOMVERTEX cvVertices[3];

cvVertices[0].colour = D3DCOLOR_XRGB(255, 255, 255);
cvVertices[0].x = leftX;
cvVertices[0].y = leftZ;
cvVertices[0].z = leftY;

cvVertices[1].colour = D3DCOLOR_XRGB(255, 255, 255);
cvVertices[1].x = rightX;
cvVertices[1].y = rightZ;
cvVertices[1].z = rightY;

cvVertices[2].colour = D3DCOLOR_XRGB(255, 255, 255);
cvVertices[2].x = apexX;
cvVertices[2].y = apexZ;
cvVertices[2].z = apexY;

VOID* pVertices;


//Get a pointer to the vertex buffer vertices and lock the vertex buffer

m_pVertexBuffer->Lock(0, sizeof(cvVertices), (VOID**)&pVertices, 0);
    
//Copy our stored vertices values into the vertex buffer

memcpy(pVertices, cvVertices, sizeof(cvVertices));

//Unlock the vertex buffer

m_pVertexBuffer->Unlock();

HRESULT hr = m_pD3DDevice->SetStreamSource(0, m_pVertexBuffer, 0, sizeof(CUSTOMVERTEX));
hr = m_pD3DDevice->SetFVF(D3DFVF_CUSTOMVERTEX);
hr = m_pD3DDevice->DrawPrimitive(D3DPT_TRIANGLESTRIP, 0, 1);

Using DirectX9 I get a tower of random triangles instead of smooth flowing terrain I get in OpenGL. Thanks, Strahan [edited by - strahan on January 7, 2004 2:37:26 PM] [edited by - strahan on January 7, 2004 2:37:44 PM] [edited by - strahan on January 7, 2004 2:38:45 PM]

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
strahan    121
I am just copying the code from the "Real-Time Dynamic Level of
Detail Terrain Rendering with ROAM" implementation that you get source for at:

http://www.gamasutra.com/features/20000403/turner_01.htm

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
chollida1    532
I think your aware of this but OpenGL and DirectX use different coordinate systems.

So you''ll need to swap your y and z values and change your winding order.

Cheers
CHris

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
evolutional    1393
If all vertices use a consistent winding order, it shouldn''t make a difference. Likewise with the Z / Y co-ords. As long as it''s consistent, the shape will remain as intended, it''d just be rotated differently.

How many vertices are you attempting to render?

In D3d, you''d allocate a VB for the whole batch of vertices and render triangles using one DrawPrimitive function.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
zander76    122
Hello

Winding order is the order that you define your triangle with.

1 --------- 2
\ |
\ |
\ |
\ |
\| 3

1, 2, 3 would be clockwize and 1,3,2 would be counter clock wise. Off hand I forget if gl is clockwize or counter clockwize.
Eitherway you can tell DX to use a Right Hand Coordinate system and then they are both the same.

Ben
ps Well apparently you can uses spaces and I am not about to start putting nbsp for everyone..

[edited by - zander76 on January 7, 2004 3:15:40 PM]

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
strahan    121
Right, I am not doing it by any means in an efficient way. Just trying to get it to render correctly first.

Here is a screen shot of my tower of triangles that should be roam terrain:

http://www.3dconquest.com/images/tower.jpg

Btw, does anyone know of a good ROAM or LOD implementation in DirectX 9 that would be easily added to one''s own 3d engine?

Thanks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
evolutional    1393
Also,

Ensure that you set up a identity World Matrix (basically resets the scene)

I assume your view and projection matrices are set up properly too (although it won''t make much difference in this instance)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Similar Content

    • By povilaslt2
      Hello. I'm Programmer who is in search of 2D game project who preferably uses OpenGL and C++. You can see my projects in GitHub. Project genre doesn't matter (except MMO's :D).
    • By ZeldaFan555
      Hello, My name is Matt. I am a programmer. I mostly use Java, but can use C++ and various other languages. I'm looking for someone to partner up with for random projects, preferably using OpenGL, though I'd be open to just about anything. If you're interested you can contact me on Skype or on here, thank you!
      Skype: Mangodoor408
    • By tyhender
      Hello, my name is Mark. I'm hobby programmer. 
      So recently,I thought that it's good idea to find people to create a full 3D engine. I'm looking for people experienced in scripting 3D shaders and implementing physics into engine(game)(we are going to use the React physics engine). 
      And,ye,no money =D I'm just looking for hobbyists that will be proud of their work. If engine(or game) will have financial succes,well,then maybe =D
      Sorry for late replies.
      I mostly give more information when people PM me,but this post is REALLY short,even for me =D
      So here's few more points:
      Engine will use openGL and SDL for graphics. It will use React3D physics library for physics simulation. Engine(most probably,atleast for the first part) won't have graphical fron-end,it will be a framework . I think final engine should be enough to set up an FPS in a couple of minutes. A bit about my self:
      I've been programming for 7 years total. I learned very slowly it as "secondary interesting thing" for like 3 years, but then began to script more seriously.  My primary language is C++,which we are going to use for the engine. Yes,I did 3D graphics with physics simulation before. No, my portfolio isn't very impressive. I'm working on that No,I wasn't employed officially. If anybody need to know more PM me. 
       
    • By Zaphyk
      I am developing my engine using the OpenGL 3.3 compatibility profile. It runs as expected on my NVIDIA card and on my Intel Card however when I tried it on an AMD setup it ran 3 times worse than on the other setups. Could this be a AMD driver thing or is this probably a problem with my OGL code? Could a different code standard create such bad performance?
    • By Kjell Andersson
      I'm trying to get some legacy OpenGL code to run with a shader pipeline,
      The legacy code uses glVertexPointer(), glColorPointer(), glNormalPointer() and glTexCoordPointer() to supply the vertex information.
      I know that it should be using setVertexAttribPointer() etc to clearly define the layout but that is not an option right now since the legacy code can't be modified to that extent.
      I've got a version 330 vertex shader to somewhat work:
      #version 330 uniform mat4 osg_ModelViewProjectionMatrix; uniform mat4 osg_ModelViewMatrix; layout(location = 0) in vec4 Vertex; layout(location = 2) in vec4 Normal; // Velocity layout(location = 3) in vec3 TexCoord; // TODO: is this the right layout location? out VertexData { vec4 color; vec3 velocity; float size; } VertexOut; void main(void) { vec4 p0 = Vertex; vec4 p1 = Vertex + vec4(Normal.x, Normal.y, Normal.z, 0.0f); vec3 velocity = (osg_ModelViewProjectionMatrix * p1 - osg_ModelViewProjectionMatrix * p0).xyz; VertexOut.velocity = velocity; VertexOut.size = TexCoord.y; gl_Position = osg_ModelViewMatrix * Vertex; } What works is the Vertex and Normal information that the legacy C++ OpenGL code seem to provide in layout location 0 and 2. This is fine.
      What I'm not getting to work is the TexCoord information that is supplied by a glTexCoordPointer() call in C++.
      Question:
      What layout location is the old standard pipeline using for glTexCoordPointer()? Or is this undefined?
       
      Side note: I'm trying to get an OpenSceneGraph 3.4.0 particle system to use custom vertex, geometry and fragment shaders for rendering the particles.
  • Popular Now