#### Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

# question on buoyancy

This topic is 5259 days old which is more than the 365 day threshold we allow for new replies. Please post a new topic.

## Recommended Posts

I have read the equations for buoyancy. Basically, the buoyant force is equal to the weight of the water displaced, which is equal to: densitywater * volume water I read that the density of water is 62.4LBs per foot, and in the great salt lake it is closer to 64lbs per foot. My physics books attributes the buoyant force to the fact that the downward pressure is less than the upward pressure, because the downward force acts on the top of a submerged object, which is shallower than the bottom of the submerged object which is simultaneously experiencing a greater upward force because it is deeper. My question is, *how* is there actually an upward force on the bottom of the submerged object? Ive thought about this for a while, and it doesn''t make sense to me at all. Is it just because there''s a ''column'' of water underneath the object, and the ''rest'' of the water is pushing upward almost like water in a straw? Again, I have memorized the equations, but I don''t know why an upward force even exists. Thanks.

##### Share on other sites
denisty * volume does not equal the force. density * volume * acceleration due to gravity does.

When you submerge an object in a fluid the rest of the fluid around that object raises the exact volume of the displaced fluid (if I haven''t articulated that correctly: when you sit in a bathtub the water level raises).

Gravity pulls all of this fluid downwater but in order for the level of the fluid to reach an equilibrium the column of water under the submerged object is forced upward.

Colin Jeanne | Invader''s Realm
"I forgot I had the Scroll Lock key until a few weeks ago when some asshole program used it. It even used it right" - Conner McCloud

##### Share on other sites
Also I don''t know why you''d want to use so disgusting units. ~1000 kgm^-3 is a far nicer density I''m sure you''d agree.

##### Share on other sites
Yes, metric system is soooo much nicer. Especially when it comes to water. And the bouyant force = displaced_volume * density * gravity;

If you don't have the acceleration due to gravity in there your units would cancel out to just mass units (like kg) and you need the acceleration to make it into newtons (kgm/s2

I believe that's an important lesson, always check your units! You're bound to make stupid mistakes if you don't (speaking from experience )

EDIT: And the force comes from the fact that gravity is pushing all the displaced water back down to it's level position, and all that water being pushed down is going to push on the object in the water, and the water under the object is going to push it up, and that's the force you get.

[edited by - Samith on April 20, 2004 5:02:56 PM]

##### Share on other sites
shadow12345, if you apply pressure to a surface there will be a force acting on the surface. The bigger the pressure, the bigger the force. The water pressure increases with depth, so the pressure acting on the bottom of the submerged object will be bigger than that acting on the top.

##### Share on other sites
quote:

shadow12345, if you apply pressure to a surface there will be a force acting on the surface. The bigger the pressure, the bigger the force. The water pressure increases with depth, so the pressure acting on the bottom of the submerged object will be bigger than that acting on the top.

Yes, I understand that, I just didn't really *get* why there was even an upward force.

quote:

And the force comes from the fact that gravity is pushing all the displaced water back down to it's level position, and all that water being pushed down is going to push on the object in the water, and the water under the object is going to push it up, and that's the force you get.

Yes, I think that makes the most sense (to me). I *think* that's what i was thinking with the straw analogy I was trying to give, unless I read what you said wrong

quote:

denisty * volume does not equal the force. density * volume * acceleration due to gravity does.

Hmm, I'm confused. A pound is a force, correct? Subsequently saying lbs * volume is the same as saying density * volume * acceleration due to gravity (slugs * volume * 32), unless I missed something?

All in all I think I understand it better, thanks you guys.

EDIT: yeah, metric system is much nicer. I dont' even understand why the english system exists or why it was ever implemented in the first place. Unfortunately, I can only ever seem to remember english system units

[edited by - shadow12345 on April 20, 2004 9:56:40 PM]

##### Share on other sites
Although this is a homework question, I''ll allow it to remain open since shadow* is actually looking for a deeper understanding of buoyancy. I don''t feel the question he is asking would be asked as a homework or test question at this education level, so I find it to be a legitimate question. Review the Forum FAQ for the general homework policy.

Graham Rhodes
Principal Scientist
Applied Research Associates, Inc.

##### Share on other sites
A pound is a mass and a force. When you are talking density you are talking mass over volume, and then when you mutliply it by volume again you end up with just plain mass. That''s why you multiply again by gravity to get the acceleration (remember F = m*a) then it''s a pound-force. (Sorry I don''t know the correct terminology with the USA system, I was only taught metric.) Hope that helps some.

##### Share on other sites
quote:
Original post by Samith
it''s a pound-force. (Sorry I don''t know the correct terminology with the USA system, I was only taught metric.)

I dont think most people who use this system know the correct terminology . It''s slugs but I believe foot-pounds is also acceptable.

Colin Jeanne | Invader''s Realm
"I forgot I had the Scroll Lock key until a few weeks ago when some asshole program used it. It even used it right" - Conner McCloud

##### Share on other sites
quote:
Original post by shadow12345
quote:

denisty * volume does not equal the force. density * volume * acceleration due to gravity does.

Hmm, I''m confused. A pound is a force, correct? Subsequently saying lbs * volume is the same as saying density * volume * acceleration due to gravity (slugs * volume * 32), unless I missed something?

A pound, like a kilogram, is a measurement of mass, not force. Weight is a measurement of force (mass*acceleration due to gravity). The difference is that if you go to the moon your mass is the same as when you''re on Earth, but your weight is only one sixth that on Earth.

Scales usually have units in pounds or kilogrammes, but they will only be correct at sea level on the Earth

quote:
EDIT: yeah, metric system is much nicer. I dont'' even understand why the english system exists or why it was ever implemented in the first place.

...or why it''s called the "English" system when we use Systeme Internationale units (metric) over here.

1. 1
2. 2
3. 3
Rutin
22
4. 4
frob
18
5. 5

• 33
• 13
• 10
• 10
• 11
• ### Forum Statistics

• Total Topics
632567
• Total Posts
3007113

×

## Important Information

We are the game development community.

Whether you are an indie, hobbyist, AAA developer, or just trying to learn, GameDev.net is the place for you to learn, share, and connect with the games industry. Learn more About Us or sign up!

Sign me up!