Jump to content
  • Advertisement
Sign in to follow this  
Betrayer_of_Code

Linked Lists

This topic is 5041 days old which is more than the 365 day threshold we allow for new replies. Please post a new topic.

If you intended to correct an error in the post then please contact us.

Recommended Posts

If I wanted to compare the info in a node: if (current->f(n) < current->nxt->f(n)) would i have to create a new pointer *next and do next = current->next; if(current->f(n) < next->f(n)) Thanks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Advertisement
nope, you could even test against the 3rd element assuming it's there...
<code>
if(current->f(n) < (current->nxt->next->f(n)))
{
...
}
</code>

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote:
Original post by Betrayer_of_Code
If I wanted to compare the info in a node:
if (current->f(n) < current->nxt->f(n)) would i have to create a new pointer *next and do

next = current->next;
if(current->f(n) < next->f(n))


Hi,

As long as you are sure that there *is* a next pointer, you don't have to put it in another variable. So if you do something like:


if (current->next != NULL)
if (current->data < current->next->data)
/* Do stuff here */



Vovan

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this  

  • Advertisement
×

Important Information

By using GameDev.net, you agree to our community Guidelines, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.

We are the game development community.

Whether you are an indie, hobbyist, AAA developer, or just trying to learn, GameDev.net is the place for you to learn, share, and connect with the games industry. Learn more About Us or sign up!

Sign me up!