//r = engine->RegisterGlobalBehaviour(asBEHAVE_EQUAL, "bool f(const string &, const string &)", asFUNCTIONPR(operator==, (const string &, const string &), bool), asCALL_CDECL); assert( r >= 0 );
r = engine->RegisterGlobalBehaviour(asBEHAVE_NOTEQUAL, "bool f(const string &, const string &)", asFUNCTIONPR(operator!=, (const string &, const string &), bool), asCALL_CDECL); assert( r >= 0 );
r = engine->RegisterGlobalBehaviour(asBEHAVE_LEQUAL, "bool f(const string &, const string &)", asFUNCTIONPR(operator<=, (const string &, const string &), bool), asCALL_CDECL); assert( r >= 0 );
r = engine->RegisterGlobalBehaviour(asBEHAVE_GEQUAL, "bool f(const string &, const string &)", asFUNCTIONPR(operator>=, (const string &, const string &), bool), asCALL_CDECL); assert( r >= 0 );
r = engine->RegisterGlobalBehaviour(asBEHAVE_LESSTHAN, "bool f(const string &, const string &)", asFUNCTIONPR(operator <, (const string &, const string &), bool), asCALL_CDECL); assert( r >= 0 );
r = engine->RegisterGlobalBehaviour(asBEHAVE_GREATERTHAN, "bool f(const string &, const string &)", asFUNCTIONPR(operator >, (const string &, const string &), bool), asCALL_CDECL); assert( r >= 0 );
r = engine->RegisterGlobalBehaviour(asBEHAVE_ADD, "string f(const string &, const string &)", asFUNCTIONPR(operator +, (const string &, const string &), string), asCALL_CDECL); assert( r >= 0 );
add on std::string
Author
I am unable to compile the code dealing with the overloaded operators.
download the latest VC6 service pack (think its 6) and it should fix your problem. If its the same error i had its a bug in the compiler not in AS.
Easily found HERE
Easily found HERE
This is obviously a bug in MSVC.NET 2003. If there is no patch available, then you will have to try to find some workaround.
Perhaps it works if you write some wrapper functions for the operators? Example:
string Concatenate(const string &a, const string &b)
{
return a+b;
}
r = engine->RegisterGlobalBehaviour(asBEHAVE_ADD, "string f(const string &, const string &)", asFUNCTION(Concatenate), asCALL_CDECL); assert( r >= 0 );
Or maybe it is sufficient to use the namespace prefix std:: on the string type?
Perhaps it works if you write some wrapper functions for the operators? Example:
string Concatenate(const string &a, const string &b)
{
return a+b;
}
r = engine->RegisterGlobalBehaviour(asBEHAVE_ADD, "string f(const string &, const string &)", asFUNCTION(Concatenate), asCALL_CDECL); assert( r >= 0 );
Or maybe it is sufficient to use the namespace prefix std:: on the string type?
Author
Yes, that is what i have done. I have wrapper functions. It just seems much nicer to not have them.
I agree with you. However, Microsoft doesn't always do so [wink].
I hope they fix the problem in a future patch.
I hope they fix the problem in a future patch.
This used to happen quite a bit in MSVC6.0 with partial specilization of member templates. I'd suspect microsoft still hasn't gotten that right, and the compiler can't resolve the pointers to template functions.
This topic is closed to new replies.
Advertisement
Popular Topics
Advertisement
