OpenGL Performance question - display lists

This topic is 4951 days old which is more than the 365 day threshold we allow for new replies. Please post a new topic.

Recommended Posts

Hi all (again)! I'm working on a demo to learn OpenGL, it's still in the initial development phases, and it's very slow (no vertex arrays, vbo or display lists). In order to get some additional frames per second, I tried to put the platform and background drawing codes (VC6 project and source files included bellow) inside display lists, still, I couldn't notice any changes. Question: Does the usage of display lists really increase general performance? I've always read that it does, but it seems to me that it's not true (maybe I'm doing it the wrong way?). Code used:
// Initializing stage
GLuint platformList;
platformList = glGenLists(1);
glNewList( platformList, GL_COMPILE );
// Many glVertex3f, glNormal and glTexCoord2f here
// Platform is lit textured cube
glEndList();

// Drawing stage
glCallList( platformList );


Thanks! Source + EXE [Edited by - MajinMusashi on November 29, 2004 1:50:06 PM]

Share on other sites
You should compile the display list once, and then repeatedly call that list. Re-compiling the list per-frame will essentially be the same as before, quite possibly slower.

- carb

Share on other sites
>>Does the usage of display lists really increase general performance? I've always read that it does,<<

no it doesnt, it will only increase performance when u have a certain situations check performance FAQs for details on how to find the bottleneck in your app. FWIW ive found with reasonable shaders the bottleneck aint the polygon rendering method eg immediate/DL/VA/VBO all render the same speed but are limited by the length/complexity of the shader

Share on other sites
Quote:
 Original post by carbYou should compile the display list once, and then repeatedly call that list. Re-compiling the list per-frame will essentially be the same as before, quite possibly slower.- carb

Note that I've written "Initialization Stage" and "Drawing Stage", and the compilation process is in the initialization stage, then I compile the list just once, and call it for every frame.

Thanks!

Share on other sites
Quote:
 no it doesnt, it will only increase performance when u have a certain situations check performance FAQs for details on how to find the bottleneck in your app. FWIW ive found with reasonable shaders the bottleneck aint the polygon rendering method eg immediate/DL/VA/VBO all render the same speed but are limited by the length/complexity of the shader

Are you trying to say that for newbie programmers like me Display Lists are not that super that people usually say? Could you tell me what are the ideal situations to perceive a certain performance boost?

Thanks!!

Share on other sites
>>Are you trying to say that for newbie programmers like me Display Lists are not that super that people usually say?<<

depends on what youre doing, eg in my app that im working on at present, everythings the same speed (though DL's have the downside of using up memory)

>>Could you tell me what are the ideal situations to perceive a certain performance boost?<<

a case that DL's like, drawing lots of verts with no complicated shaders/states to a small screen.

eg i just a ran a small benchmark
(317.8 inds/sec) ( 56.6 v/sec)(105.9 t/sec)TRIS vertex3f GLushort DL
(307.2 inds/sec) ( 54.7 v/sec)(102.4 t/sec)TRIS vertex3f GLushort VBO
(306.1 inds/sec) ( 54.5 v/sec)(102.0 t/sec)TRIS vertex3f GLushort VBO (range)
(304.9 inds/sec) ( 54.3 v/sec)(101.6 t/sec)TRIS vertex3f GLuint VBO (range)
(303.8 inds/sec) ( 54.1 v/sec)(101.3 t/sec)TRIS vertex3f GLuint VBO
(253.0 inds/sec) ( 45.0 v/sec)( 84.3 t/sec)TRIS vertex3f GLuint DL
(205.9 inds/sec) ( 36.6 v/sec)( 68.6 t/sec)TRIS vertex3f GLushort VA (range)
(205.9 inds/sec) ( 36.6 v/sec)( 68.6 t/sec)TRIS vertex3f GLuint VA (range)
(142.3 inds/sec) ( 25.3 v/sec)( 47.4 t/sec)TRIS vertex3f GLushort VA
(141.8 inds/sec) ( 25.2 v/sec)( 47.3 t/sec)TRIS vertex3f GLuint VA
( 45.4 inds/sec) ( 8.1 v/sec)( 15.1 t/sec)TRIS vertex3f GLuint IMMED
( 45.1 inds/sec) ( 8.0 v/sec)( 15.0 t/sec)TRIS vertex3f GLushort IMMED

as u can see immediate is the slowest here BUT keep in mind this is not a real world app

Share on other sites
Display Lists are not guaranteed to give a speed boost. They do, however, give the drivers a chance to increase performance. However , most modern 3D drivers will attempt to.

What zedgeek was saying was that if you can send data to the graphics card faster than it can process it, no matter how much you improve the speed of sending data to the card you will see no improvement.

One way this could be happening, is that if it takes longer to clear the screen than if does for you do to send the data to it, and the sending of the data is overlapped with the clearing of the screen, then you get the following effect:

Without display lists:clear: *****************send :  **********draw :                  *******With display lists:clear: *****************send :  ****draw :                  *******

No matter how much you speed up the send operation, because it's not the limiting factor (the bottleneck), you'll never get a speedup. It's not to do with whether you are a newbie or not.

You need to find the limiting factor and fix that. Get something working and then optimise.

Share on other sites
Quote:
 Original post by zedzeekcheck performance FAQs for details on how to find the bottleneck in your app.

See the first few pages of the performance pdf in my sig for a flow chart on how to find the slowest part (only a few will be applicable to you however)

[Edited by - _the_phantom_ on November 30, 2004 11:41:33 AM]

Share on other sites
Quote:
 See the first few pages of the performance pdf in my sig for a flow chart on how to find the slowest part (only a few will be applicable to you however)

What signature? :) I found it in another post, and I already knew it, but as you say, only a few hints are applicable to me.

Thanks!!!

Share on other sites
heh, sorry about that, I do that sometimes, point at my sig and then forget to press the 'include sig' box [grin]

• Similar Content

• By nOoNEE
hello guys , i have some questions  what does glLinkProgram  and  glBindAttribLocation do?  i searched but there wasnt any good resource
• By owenjr
Hi, I'm a Multimedia Engineering student. I am about to finish my dergree and I'm already thinking about what topic to cover in my final college project.
I'm interested in the procedural animation with c++ and OpenGL of creatures, something like a spider for example. Can someone tell me what are the issues I should investigate to carry it out? I understand that it has some dependence on artificial intelligence but I do not know to what extent. Can someone help me to find information about it? Thank you very much.

Examples:
- Procedural multi-legged walking animation
- Procedural Locomotion of Multi-Legged Characters in Dynamic Environments
• By Lewa
So, i'm still on my quest to unterstanding the intricacies of HDR and implementing this into my engine. Currently i'm at the step to implementing tonemapping. I stumbled upon this blogposts:
http://filmicworlds.com/blog/filmic-tonemapping-operators/
http://frictionalgames.blogspot.com/2012/09/tech-feature-hdr-lightning.html
and tried to implement some of those mentioned tonemapping methods into my postprocessing shader.
The issue is that none of them creates the same results as shown in the blogpost which definitely has to do with the initial range in which the values are stored in the HDR buffer. For simplicity sake i store the values between 0 and 1 in the HDR buffer (ambient light is 0.3, directional light is 0.7)
This is the tonemapping code:
vec3 Uncharted2Tonemap(vec3 x) { float A = 0.15; float B = 0.50; float C = 0.10; float D = 0.20; float E = 0.02; float F = 0.30; return ((x*(A*x+C*B)+D*E)/(x*(A*x+B)+D*F))-E/F; } This is without the uncharted tonemapping:
This is with the uncharted tonemapping:
Which makes the image a lot darker.
The shader code looks like this:
void main() { vec3 color = texture2D(texture_diffuse, vTexcoord).rgb; color = Uncharted2Tonemap(color); //gamma correction (use only if not done in tonemapping code) color = gammaCorrection(color); outputF = vec4(color,1.0f); } Now, from my understanding is that tonemapping should bring the range down from HDR to 0-1.
But the output of the tonemapping function heavily depends on the initial range of the values in the HDR buffer. (You can't expect to set the sun intensity the first time to 10 and the second time to 1000 and excpect the same result if you feed that into the tonemapper.) So i suppose that this also depends on the exposure which i have to implement?
To check this i plotted the tonemapping curve:
You can see that the curve goes only up to around to a value of 0.21 (while being fed a value of 1) and then basically flattens out. (which would explain why the image got darker.)

My guestion is: In what range should the values in the HDR buffer be which then get tonemapped? Do i have to bring them down to a range of 0-1 by multiplying with the exposure?
For example, if i increase the values of the light by 10 (directional light would be 7 and ambient light 3) then i would need to divide HDR values by 10 in order to get a value range of 0-1 which then could be fed into the tonemapping curve. Is that correct?
• By nOoNEE
in the OpenGL Rendering Pipeline section there is a picture like this: link
but the question is this i dont really understand why it is necessary to turn pixel data in to fragment and then fragment into pixel could please give me a source or a clear Explanation that why it is necessary ? thank you so mu

• By Inbar_xz
I'm using the OPENGL with eclipse+JOGL.
My goal is to create movement of the camera and the player.
I create main class, which create some box in 3D and hold
an object of PlayerAxis.
I create PlayerAxis class which hold the axis of the player.
If we want to move the camera, then in the main class I call to
the func "cameraMove"(from PlayerAxis) and it update the player axis.
That's work good.
The problem start if I move the camera on 2 axis,
for example if I move with the camera right(that's on the y axis)
and then down(on the x axis) -
in some point the move front is not to the front anymore..
In order to move to the front, I do
player.playerMoving(0, 0, 1);
And I learn that in order to keep the front move,
I need to convert (0, 0, 1) to the player axis, and then add this.
I think I dont do the convert right..
I will be glad for help!

Here is part of my PlayerAxis class:

//player coordinate float x[] = new float[3]; float y[] = new float[3]; float z[] = new float[3]; public PlayerAxis(float move_step, float angle_move) { x[0] = 1; y[1] = 1﻿; z[2] = -1; step = move_step; angle = angle_move; setTransMatrix(); } public void cameraMoving(float angle_step, String axis) { float[] new_x = x; float[] new_y = y; float[] new_z = z; float alfa = angle_step * angle; switch(axis) { case "x": new_z = addVectors(multScalar(z, COS(alfa)), multScalar(y, SIN(alfa))); new_y = subVectors(multScalar(y, COS(alfa)), multScalar(z, SIN(alfa))); break; case "y": new_x = addVectors(multScalar(x, COS(alfa)), multScalar(z, SIN(alfa))); new_z = subVectors(multScalar(z, COS(alfa)), multScalar(x, SIN(alfa))); break; case "z": new_x = addVectors(multScalar(x, COS(alfa)), multScalar(y, SIN(alfa))); new_y = subVectors(multScalar(y, COS(alfa)), multScalar(x, SIN(alfa))); }﻿ x = new_x; y = new_y; z = new_z; normalization(); } public void playerMoving(float x_move, float y_move, float z_move) { float[] move = new float[3]; move[0] = x_move; move[1] = y_move; move[2] = z_move; setTransMatrix(); float[] trans_move = transVector(move); position[0] = position[0] + step*trans_move[0]; position[1] = position[1] + step*trans_move[1]; position[2] = position[2] + step*trans_move[2]; } public void setTransMat﻿rix() { for (int i = 0; i < 3; i++) { coordiTrans[0][i] = x[i]; coordiTrans[1][i] = y[i]; ﻿coordiTrans[2][i] = z[i]; } } public float[] transVector(float[] v) { return multiplyMatrixInVector(coordiTrans, v); }
and in the main class i have this:

public void keyPressed(KeyEvent e) { if (e.getKeyCode()== KeyEvent.VK_ESCAPE) { System.exit(0); //player move } else if (e.getKeyCode()== KeyEvent.VK_W) { //front //moveAmount[2] += -0.1f; player.playerMoving(0, 0, 1); } else if (e.getKeyCode()== KeyEvent.VK_S) { //back //moveAmount[2] += 0.1f; player.playerMoving(0, 0, -1); } else if (e.getKeyCode()== KeyEvent.VK_A) { //left //moveAmount[0] += -0.1f; player.playerMoving(-1, 0, 0); } else if (e.getKeyCode()== KeyEvent.VK_D) { //right //moveAmount[0] += 0.1f; player.playerMoving(1, 0, 0); } else if (e.getKeyCode()== KeyEvent.VK_E) { //moveAmount[0] += 0.1f; player.playerMoving(0, 1, 0); } else if (e.getKeyCode()== KeyEvent.VK_Q) { //moveAmount[0] += 0.1f; player.playerMoving(0, -1, 0); //camera move } else if (e.getKeyCode()== KeyEvent.VK_I) { //up player.cameraMoving(1, "x"); } else if (e.getKeyCode()== KeyEvent.VK_K) { //down player.cameraMoving(-1, "x"); } else if (e.getKeyCode()== KeyEvent.VK_L) { //right player.cameraMoving(-1, "y"); } else if (e.getKeyCode()== KeyEvent.VK_J) { //left player.cameraMoving(1, "y"); } else if (e.getKeyCode()== KeyEvent.VK_O) { //right round player.cameraMoving(-1, "z"); } else if (e.getKeyCode()== KeyEvent.VK_U) { //left round player.cameraMoving(1, "z"); } }
finallt found it.... i confused with the transformation matrix row and col. thanks anyway!
• By Lewa
So, i'm currently trying to implement an SSAO shader from THIS tutorial and i'm running into a few issues here.
Now, this SSAO method requires view space positions and normals. I'm storing the normals in my deferred renderer in world-space so i had to do a conversion and reconstruct the position from the depth buffer.
And something there goes horribly wrong (which has probably to do with worldspace to viewspace transformations).
(here is the full shader source code if someone wants to take a look at it)
Now, i suspect that the normals are the culprit.
vec3 normal = ((uNormalViewMatrix*vec4(normalize(texture2D(sNormals, vTexcoord).rgb),1.0)).xyz); "sNormals" is a 2D texture which stores the normals in world space in a RGB FP16 buffer.
Now i can't use the camera viewspace matrix to transform the normals into viewspace as the cameras position isn't set at (0,0,0), thus skewing the result.
So what i did is to create a new viewmatrix specifically for this normal without the position at vec3(0,0,0);
//"camera" is the camera which was used for rendering the normal buffer renderer.setUniform4m(ressources->shaderSSAO->getUniform("uNormalViewMatrix"), glmExt::createViewMatrix(glm::vec3(0,0,0),camera.getForward(),camera.getUp())//parameters are (position,forwardVector,upVector) ); Though i have the feeling this is the wrong approach. Is this right or is there a better/correct way of transforming a world space normal into viewspace?

• Hi,
I'm trying mix two textures using own shader system, but I have a problem (I think) with uniforms.
To debug I use RenderDocs, but I did not receive good results. In the first attachment is my result, in the second attachment is what should be.
PS. I base on this tutorial https://learnopengl.com/Getting-started/Textures.

• I'm having issues loading textures, as I'm clueless on how to handle / load images maybe I missing something, but the past few days I just google a lot to try to find a solution. Well theres two issues I think, one I'm using Kotlin Native (EAP) and OpenGL wrapper / STB image, so I'm not quite sure wheres the issue, if someone with more experience could give me some hints on how to solve this issue?
The code is here, if I'm not mistaken the workflow is pretty straight forward, stbi_load returns the pixels of the image (as char array or byte array) and you need to pass those pixels directly to glTexImage2D, so a I'm missing something here it seems.
Regards

• I've noticed in most post processing tutorials several shaders are used one after another: one for bloom, another for contrast, and so on. For example:
postprocessing.quad.bind() // Effect 1 effect1.shader.bind(); postprocessing.texture.bind(); postprocessing.quad.draw(); postprocessing.texture.unbind(); effect1.shader.unbind(); // Effect 2 effect2.shader.bind(); // ...and so on postprocessing.quad.unbind() Is this good practice, how many shaders can I bind and unbind before I hit performance issues? I'm afraid I don't know what the good practices are in open/webGL regarding binding and unbinding resources.
I'm guessing binding many shaders at post processing is okay since the scene has already been updated and I'm just working on a quad and texture at that moment. Or is it more optimal to put shader code in chunks and bind less frequently? I'd love to use several shaders at post though.
Another example of what I'm doing at the moment:
1) Loop through GameObjects, bind its phong shader (send color, shadow, spec, normal samplers), unbind all.
2) At post: bind post processor quad, and loop/bind through different shader effects, and so on ...
Thanks all!

• void collision(int v) { collision_bug_one(0.0f, 10.0f); glutPostRedisplay(); glutTimerFunc(1000, collision, 0); } void coll_sprite() { if (board[0][0] == 1) { collision(0); flag[0][0] = 1; } } void erase_sprite() { if (flag[0][0] == 1) { glColor3f(0.0f, 0.0f, 0.0f); glBegin(GL_POLYGON); glVertex3f(0.0f, 10.0f, 0.0f); glVertex3f(0.0f, 9.0f, 0.0f); glVertex3f(1.0f, 9.0f, 0.0f); glVertex3f(1.0f, 10.0f, 0.0f); glEnd(); } } I am using glutTimerFunc to wait a small amount of time to display a collision sprite before I black out the sprite. unfortunately my code only blacks out the said sprite without drawing the collision sprite, I have done a great deal of research on the glutTimerFunc and  animation.

• 17
• 11
• 12
• 9
• 49
• Forum Statistics

• Total Topics
631394
• Total Posts
2999755
×