• Advertisement
Sign in to follow this  

OpenGL OPenGL and C++ classes related...

This topic is 4791 days old which is more than the 365 day threshold we allow for new replies. Please post a new topic.

If you intended to correct an error in the post then please contact us.

Recommended Posts

i am trying to figure out how to implement part of my class or rather how i call the call from main to do something specific. i have rendered out some terrain and have the code in my class that returns back the xyz position whenever i click on the terrain with the mouse and then i draw a white sphere at that location in 3D. this is all well and work flawlessly. i have more than one set of terrain data sets so i am tryingto figure out a generic way to call these class routines from main. for example i declare my data sets as: myClass *terrain1 = new myClass(...); myClass *terrain2 - new myClass(...); when i pick on the terrain with the left mouse button, i then check to see where i picked. the code is here using glut.
void myGlutMouse(int button, int button_state, int x, int y)
{
  if ( button == GLUT_LEFT_BUTTON && button_state == GLUT_DOWN ) 
  {
    last_x = x;
    last_y = y;
  
  if(terrain1->world_coords(x, y, world_pick))
     terrain1->get_world(world_pick[0], world_pick[1], world_pick[2]);
  }
                        
   glutPostRedisplay();
} 
so world_coords receives x & y and returns true if i picked on the terrain itself and not just anywhere in space and stores where i picked in 3D space and stores this into an array world_pick. get_world send this (x,y,z) pair into the class so i can either print out on the screen what that was and/or where to draw the solid sphere on the terrain to act as a probe. here is my problem: you notice that i use terrain1.. but how would i use something generic so i can get the pick values from terrain2 or any other terrain that i am rendering? thanks in advance!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Advertisement
just have a pointer to the current terrain and set it to the value of the terrain you want to test.


... somwhere in code ...
currentterrain = terrain2;

void myGlutMouse(int button, int button_state, int x, int y)
{
if ( button == GLUT_LEFT_BUTTON && button_state == GLUT_DOWN )
{
last_x = x;
last_y = y;

if(currentterrain->world_coords(x, y, world_pick))
currentterrain->get_world(world_pick[0], world_pick[1], world_pick[2]);
}

glutPostRedisplay();
}



So when you want to swap terrains you just assign a pointer to the terrain to the global 'currentterrain' pointer and it works.

I am ofcourse assuming I'm understanding what you want todo correctly [smile]

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
so if i have 6 different terrains then i could just say..

myClass *current_terrain = terrain1;
myClass *current_terrain = terrain2;
myClass *current_terrain = terrain3;
myClass *current_terrain = terrain4;
myClass *current_terrain = terrain5;
myClass *current_terrain = terrain6;

????

what if i want to render more than 1 terrain at one time?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
well, you'd declare 'currentterrain' once and then assign the correct terrain to the varible to you can query it.

If you need to have more than one terrain current at a time then just maintin a list of the active terrains to query.

However, I dont see why you would need more than one terrain current at once, heck i'm not sure why you'd want to load more than one at once [wink]

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
i still dont get what you mean. if i have 6 different terrains and want to probe either of them at any time i have to assign this some way. the person i am writing this for wants to compare 2 terrains together to see the differences...:)

anyway im gonna have to have something like this i am guessing...

if(drawing terrain1)
current_terrain = terrain1;
else if(drawing_terrain2)
????current_terr..............;

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
if he wants to query both terrains at once then just query them, otherwise yes you'll basically do as you said

... somewhere...
myClass * currentterrain;

... main loop ...
if(terrain1 == current)
currentterrain = terrain1;
else if(terrain2 == current)
currentterrain = terrain2;
.. etc etc ..



then in your msg handler just query it via the currentterrain pointer as I showed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this  

  • Advertisement
  • Advertisement
  • Popular Tags

  • Advertisement
  • Popular Now

  • Similar Content

    • By LifeArtist
      Good Evening,
      I want to make a 2D game which involves displaying some debug information. Especially for collision, enemy sights and so on ...
      First of I was thinking about all those shapes which I need will need for debugging purposes: circles, rectangles, lines, polygons.
      I am really stucked right now because of the fundamental question:
      Where do I store my vertices positions for each line (object)? Currently I am not using a model matrix because I am using orthographic projection and set the final position within the VBO. That means that if I add a new line I would have to expand the "points" array and re-upload (recall glBufferData) it every time. The other method would be to use a model matrix and a fixed vbo for a line but it would be also messy to exactly create a line from (0,0) to (100,20) calculating the rotation and scale to make it fit.
      If I proceed with option 1 "updating the array each frame" I was thinking of having 4 draw calls every frame for the lines vao, polygons vao and so on. 
      In addition to that I am planning to use some sort of ECS based architecture. So the other question would be:
      Should I treat those debug objects as entities/components?
      For me it would make sense to treat them as entities but that's creates a new issue with the previous array approach because it would have for example a transform and render component. A special render component for debug objects (no texture etc) ... For me the transform component is also just a matrix but how would I then define a line?
      Treating them as components would'nt be a good idea in my eyes because then I would always need an entity. Well entity is just an id !? So maybe its a component?
      Regards,
      LifeArtist
    • By QQemka
      Hello. I am coding a small thingy in my spare time. All i want to achieve is to load a heightmap (as the lowest possible walking terrain), some static meshes (elements of the environment) and a dynamic character (meaning i can move, collide with heightmap/static meshes and hold a varying item in a hand ). Got a bunch of questions, or rather problems i can't find solution to myself. Nearly all are deal with graphics/gpu, not the coding part. My c++ is on high enough level.
      Let's go:
      Heightmap - i obviously want it to be textured, size is hardcoded to 256x256 squares. I can't have one huge texture stretched over entire terrain cause every pixel would be enormous. Thats why i decided to use 2 specified textures. First will be a tileset consisting of 16 square tiles (u v range from 0 to 0.25 for first tile and so on) and second a 256x256 buffer with 0-15 value representing index of the tile from tileset for every heigtmap square. Problem is, how do i blend the edges nicely and make some computationally cheap changes so its not obvious there are only 16 tiles? Is it possible to generate such terrain with some existing program?
      Collisions - i want to use bounding sphere and aabb. But should i store them for a model or entity instance? Meaning i have 20 same trees spawned using the same tree model, but every entity got its own transformation (position, scale etc). Storing collision component per instance grats faster access + is precalculated and transformed (takes additional memory, but who cares?), so i stick with this, right? What should i do if object is dynamically rotated? The aabb is no longer aligned and calculating per vertex min/max everytime object rotates/scales is pretty expensive, right?
      Drawing aabb - problem similar to above (storing aabb data per instance or model). This time in my opinion per model is enough since every instance also does not have own vertex buffer but uses the shared one (so 20 trees share reference to one tree model). So rendering aabb is about taking the model's aabb, transforming with instance matrix and voila. What about aabb vertex buffer (this is more of a cosmetic question, just curious, bumped onto it in time of writing this). Is it better to make it as 8 points and index buffer (12 lines), or only 2 vertices with min/max x/y/z and having the shaders dynamically generate 6 other vertices and draw the box? Or maybe there should be just ONE 1x1x1 cube box template moved/scaled per entity?
      What if one model got a diffuse texture and a normal map, and other has only diffuse? Should i pass some bool flag to shader with that info, or just assume that my game supports only diffuse maps without fancy stuff?
      There were several more but i forgot/solved them at time of writing
      Thanks in advance
    • By RenanRR
      Hi All,
      I'm reading the tutorials from learnOpengl site (nice site) and I'm having a question on the camera (https://learnopengl.com/Getting-started/Camera).
      I always saw the camera being manipulated with the lookat, but in tutorial I saw the camera being changed through the MVP arrays, which do not seem to be camera, but rather the scene that changes:
      Vertex Shader:
      #version 330 core layout (location = 0) in vec3 aPos; layout (location = 1) in vec2 aTexCoord; out vec2 TexCoord; uniform mat4 model; uniform mat4 view; uniform mat4 projection; void main() { gl_Position = projection * view * model * vec4(aPos, 1.0f); TexCoord = vec2(aTexCoord.x, aTexCoord.y); } then, the matrix manipulated:
      ..... glm::mat4 projection = glm::perspective(glm::radians(fov), (float)SCR_WIDTH / (float)SCR_HEIGHT, 0.1f, 100.0f); ourShader.setMat4("projection", projection); .... glm::mat4 view = glm::lookAt(cameraPos, cameraPos + cameraFront, cameraUp); ourShader.setMat4("view", view); .... model = glm::rotate(model, glm::radians(angle), glm::vec3(1.0f, 0.3f, 0.5f)); ourShader.setMat4("model", model);  
      So, some doubts:
      - Why use it like that?
      - Is it okay to manipulate the camera that way?
      -in this way, are not the vertex's positions that changes instead of the camera?
      - I need to pass MVP to all shaders of object in my scenes ?
       
      What it seems, is that the camera stands still and the scenery that changes...
      it's right?
       
       
      Thank you
       
    • By dpadam450
      Sampling a floating point texture where the alpha channel holds 4-bytes of packed data into the float. I don't know how to cast the raw memory to treat it as an integer so I can perform bit-shifting operations.

      int rgbValue = int(textureSample.w);//4 bytes of data packed as color
      // algorithm might not be correct and endianness might need switching.
      vec3 extractedData = vec3(  rgbValue & 0xFF000000,  (rgbValue << 8) & 0xFF000000, (rgbValue << 16) & 0xFF000000);
      extractedData /= 255.0f;
    • By Devashish Khandelwal
      While writing a simple renderer using OpenGL, I faced an issue with the glGetUniformLocation function. For some reason, the location is coming to be -1.
      Anyone has any idea .. what should I do?
  • Advertisement