• Advertisement
Sign in to follow this  

OpenGL OpenGL arbirtary display start address

This topic is 4793 days old which is more than the 365 day threshold we allow for new replies. Please post a new topic.

If you intended to correct an error in the post then please contact us.

Recommended Posts

My name is Julio Menezes and I leave in Brazil. I need some help. I have developed an 3D stereo system with LCD glasses that uses arbirtary display start address. Is it possible with OpenGL or SDL ? thaks in advanced, happy 2005, []s julio menezes ------------------------------------------------------- I'm trying to port my 32bitDOS WATCOM C Stereo application with LCDglasses + VESA bios calls to GNU/LINUX. My application require arbitrary LEFT RIGHT display start address (hardware scroll). Not interlaced G1024x768x256 and a 120Hz capable Monitor (flicker free). It uses an old Diamond card with 2MB. Two pages running on a 233Mhz CPU. My system makes direct IO to set the DisplayStartAddress on a S3 Card. I need this because it must runs from inside an Hardware Interrupt Routine. REAL MODE x PROTECTED MODE, 16 BITS BIOS ON A 32 BITS PROCESSOR. It stinks... How it works: I use two separate video pages, which can be displayed on the screen independently. These can contain two views (PHOTOS) of a scene, taken from slightly different viewpoints. These are displayed alternately on the screen, in sync with a pair of "chopper glasses", to give a 3D effect. /* HOW IT WAS UNDER MS_DOS + WATCOM C: //------------------------------------------------------------- JM 10/10/97 // CHIP S3 (Diamond Stealth), 2MB memory board: (y=1280+768)=2048 // Problem: Can't call VESA functions from inside INTERRUPT routine. // FLIP. LEFT: y=0; RIGHT: y = +-768. 0 <= y < (2048 - 768) // Right page must move a little UP and DOWN to adjust with the LEFT. // 3d4h index 38h (R/W): Extensions Enable // bit 0-7 Writing 48h to this register enables the extended registers, // writing 0 disables them. // 3d4h index 39h (R/W): Extensions Enable 2 // bit 0-7 Write A5h to this register to unlock extensions. INT16 Diamond_DisplayStart(INT16 y) // y = page begining { #define CRTC_IND 0x3D4 outpw(CRTC_IND,0x4838); // unlock S3 Chip extentions outpw(CRTC_IND,0xA539); // writing 0xA5 outpw(CRTC_IND,0x0069 | (y & 0xFF00)); outpw(CRTC_IND,0x000c | ((y & 0x00FF) << 8)); outpw(CRTC_IND,0x000d); return(y); } // Diamond_DisplayStart //-------------------------------------------------------------------------- #define LPT_ADDRESS 0x378 //------------------------------------------------------------- JM 10/10/97 // Interrupt: take IRQ from LPT, swap LCD lens and page flipping. // Vertical Sync Pulse from Monitor inserted on LPT. // VESA Display Data Channel (DDC) Standard. 15-pin mini Sub-D: // VESA Pins: // 13 Horzontal Sync // 14 Vertical Sync // void __interrupt __far iNovaIntChinon(__CPPARGS) { // 0x379 read pin 12 to know the open lens of the LCD glasses 0=Left 1=Right Chinon_.LR = (INT16)((inp(LPTADDRESS + 1) & 0x0020) >> 5); //0 or 1 if (Chinon_.LR) Diamond_DisplayStart(768 + ChinonGetPyRight()); // adjust Right else Diamond_DisplayStart(0); // Left outp(PIC00,EOI); // 8259 IRQ DONE outp(LPTADDRESS + 2, 0x00); // fix PC bug outp(LPTADDRESS + 2, 0x10); // INT LPT ON } // iNovaIntChinon //--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Advertisement
in short, no you cant with OpenGL if you require hardware support, as you have to request a context from the video drivers and they will keep things in video ram.

If you wanted to use a software driver like Mesa then you might be able to rig something up.

From my quick look over the code I guess what you are doing is sending one picture down the line, singling on the LPT port, then swapping to the next picture and singling again.

You might beable to attack this from another direction, render the image twice to two buffers (textures maybe), then draw one to the screen and swap the buffer and single and then draw the other and swap the buffer.
If you select a 120hz display mode in theory this should give you 60hz on each display).

I'd like to point out this is only guess work, but in theory the idea above should work.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
So basically you have two stereoscopic images, each representign what an eye sees.
I don't know how glasses work (you will need two screens for that, like you said), but in OpenGL you can displace the entire scene as much as you want (left or right) by slightly changing the camera position for every scene. In OpenGL you can also render the scene in a texture, so you can render it in two different textures (left and right views) then try to send each image to a different screen (I have no idea how to do that tho).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this  

  • Advertisement
  • Advertisement
  • Popular Tags

  • Advertisement
  • Popular Now

  • Similar Content

    • By LifeArtist
      Good Evening,
      I want to make a 2D game which involves displaying some debug information. Especially for collision, enemy sights and so on ...
      First of I was thinking about all those shapes which I need will need for debugging purposes: circles, rectangles, lines, polygons.
      I am really stucked right now because of the fundamental question:
      Where do I store my vertices positions for each line (object)? Currently I am not using a model matrix because I am using orthographic projection and set the final position within the VBO. That means that if I add a new line I would have to expand the "points" array and re-upload (recall glBufferData) it every time. The other method would be to use a model matrix and a fixed vbo for a line but it would be also messy to exactly create a line from (0,0) to (100,20) calculating the rotation and scale to make it fit.
      If I proceed with option 1 "updating the array each frame" I was thinking of having 4 draw calls every frame for the lines vao, polygons vao and so on. 
      In addition to that I am planning to use some sort of ECS based architecture. So the other question would be:
      Should I treat those debug objects as entities/components?
      For me it would make sense to treat them as entities but that's creates a new issue with the previous array approach because it would have for example a transform and render component. A special render component for debug objects (no texture etc) ... For me the transform component is also just a matrix but how would I then define a line?
      Treating them as components would'nt be a good idea in my eyes because then I would always need an entity. Well entity is just an id !? So maybe its a component?
      Regards,
      LifeArtist
    • By QQemka
      Hello. I am coding a small thingy in my spare time. All i want to achieve is to load a heightmap (as the lowest possible walking terrain), some static meshes (elements of the environment) and a dynamic character (meaning i can move, collide with heightmap/static meshes and hold a varying item in a hand ). Got a bunch of questions, or rather problems i can't find solution to myself. Nearly all are deal with graphics/gpu, not the coding part. My c++ is on high enough level.
      Let's go:
      Heightmap - i obviously want it to be textured, size is hardcoded to 256x256 squares. I can't have one huge texture stretched over entire terrain cause every pixel would be enormous. Thats why i decided to use 2 specified textures. First will be a tileset consisting of 16 square tiles (u v range from 0 to 0.25 for first tile and so on) and second a 256x256 buffer with 0-15 value representing index of the tile from tileset for every heigtmap square. Problem is, how do i blend the edges nicely and make some computationally cheap changes so its not obvious there are only 16 tiles? Is it possible to generate such terrain with some existing program?
      Collisions - i want to use bounding sphere and aabb. But should i store them for a model or entity instance? Meaning i have 20 same trees spawned using the same tree model, but every entity got its own transformation (position, scale etc). Storing collision component per instance grats faster access + is precalculated and transformed (takes additional memory, but who cares?), so i stick with this, right? What should i do if object is dynamically rotated? The aabb is no longer aligned and calculating per vertex min/max everytime object rotates/scales is pretty expensive, right?
      Drawing aabb - problem similar to above (storing aabb data per instance or model). This time in my opinion per model is enough since every instance also does not have own vertex buffer but uses the shared one (so 20 trees share reference to one tree model). So rendering aabb is about taking the model's aabb, transforming with instance matrix and voila. What about aabb vertex buffer (this is more of a cosmetic question, just curious, bumped onto it in time of writing this). Is it better to make it as 8 points and index buffer (12 lines), or only 2 vertices with min/max x/y/z and having the shaders dynamically generate 6 other vertices and draw the box? Or maybe there should be just ONE 1x1x1 cube box template moved/scaled per entity?
      What if one model got a diffuse texture and a normal map, and other has only diffuse? Should i pass some bool flag to shader with that info, or just assume that my game supports only diffuse maps without fancy stuff?
      There were several more but i forgot/solved them at time of writing
      Thanks in advance
    • By RenanRR
      Hi All,
      I'm reading the tutorials from learnOpengl site (nice site) and I'm having a question on the camera (https://learnopengl.com/Getting-started/Camera).
      I always saw the camera being manipulated with the lookat, but in tutorial I saw the camera being changed through the MVP arrays, which do not seem to be camera, but rather the scene that changes:
      Vertex Shader:
      #version 330 core layout (location = 0) in vec3 aPos; layout (location = 1) in vec2 aTexCoord; out vec2 TexCoord; uniform mat4 model; uniform mat4 view; uniform mat4 projection; void main() { gl_Position = projection * view * model * vec4(aPos, 1.0f); TexCoord = vec2(aTexCoord.x, aTexCoord.y); } then, the matrix manipulated:
      ..... glm::mat4 projection = glm::perspective(glm::radians(fov), (float)SCR_WIDTH / (float)SCR_HEIGHT, 0.1f, 100.0f); ourShader.setMat4("projection", projection); .... glm::mat4 view = glm::lookAt(cameraPos, cameraPos + cameraFront, cameraUp); ourShader.setMat4("view", view); .... model = glm::rotate(model, glm::radians(angle), glm::vec3(1.0f, 0.3f, 0.5f)); ourShader.setMat4("model", model);  
      So, some doubts:
      - Why use it like that?
      - Is it okay to manipulate the camera that way?
      -in this way, are not the vertex's positions that changes instead of the camera?
      - I need to pass MVP to all shaders of object in my scenes ?
       
      What it seems, is that the camera stands still and the scenery that changes...
      it's right?
       
       
      Thank you
       
    • By dpadam450
      Sampling a floating point texture where the alpha channel holds 4-bytes of packed data into the float. I don't know how to cast the raw memory to treat it as an integer so I can perform bit-shifting operations.

      int rgbValue = int(textureSample.w);//4 bytes of data packed as color
      // algorithm might not be correct and endianness might need switching.
      vec3 extractedData = vec3(  rgbValue & 0xFF000000,  (rgbValue << 8) & 0xFF000000, (rgbValue << 16) & 0xFF000000);
      extractedData /= 255.0f;
    • By Devashish Khandelwal
      While writing a simple renderer using OpenGL, I faced an issue with the glGetUniformLocation function. For some reason, the location is coming to be -1.
      Anyone has any idea .. what should I do?
  • Advertisement