Passing expressions?
Author
Is there any way to pass an expression as an argument to a function?
I'm asking because I have several occasions where I check alll the squares around a given square, but I'm checking for something different each time. It would neaten up my code considerably if it could be done.
something like this?
int f1(int n);
main()
{
int m1 = 421;
int m2 = f1( (m1+360));
return;
}
or if you wanted to get tricky....
main()
{
int m1 = 46;
int m2 = f1( 144 + f1(32 + f1(75)) + m1);
return;
}
perfectly valid.
int f1(int n);
main()
{
int m1 = 421;
int m2 = f1( (m1+360));
return;
}
or if you wanted to get tricky....
main()
{
int m1 = 46;
int m2 = f1( 144 + f1(32 + f1(75)) + m1);
return;
}
perfectly valid.
Author
That's not exactly what I meant. With your example, your still p[assing an integer to the function, not the expression itself. Something like the following:
would result in the following being seen by the debugger:
Obviously, this is a simplistic and pointless example, but it gives the general idea. the function eval would look at a number of structures and return whichever matched the expression.
int eval(expression);{ n=10 return(expression);}int main(){ eval((n+5*4));}would result in the following being seen by the debugger:
return (10+5*4);Obviously, this is a simplistic and pointless example, but it gives the general idea. the function eval would look at a number of structures and return whichever matched the expression.
Quote:
Obviously, this is a simplistic and pointless example, but it gives the general idea. the function eval would look at a number of structures and return whichever matched the expression.
Can you explain some more please? It sounds like you are in need of function templates, but I'm not sure, perhaps another example that is closer to what you want to happen.
In your example above, that will work as long as 'n' was defined and initialized before it was called in that function. Here's a few random links:
Fast regular expressions
MSDN Reference
I think what you want is lambda expression as in Lisp, but C and C++ has no lambda directly built-in.
You may get "similar" effect using function pointer in C and C++, or functor in C++.
You may get "similar" effect using function pointer in C and C++, or functor in C++.
<obiewankenobi>C is not the language you are looking for</obiewankenobi>
Yeah, if you wanted to do that in C, you would have to used some messed up templates or function pointers, which would totaly obfuscate your code.
I think you want LISP.
Yeah, if you wanted to do that in C, you would have to used some messed up templates or function pointers, which would totaly obfuscate your code.
I think you want LISP.
The abstraction exists in C++, as others have alluded to, and it's not that bad - however, you don't get to create the things in-line so easily:
Java improves on this by allowing you to specify the expression code at the point where you create the object (and also makes all the polymorphism stuff easier to deal with), but worsens it by requiring a normal named method instead of an "operator()" overload. Other languages in the same "family" are generally not much better or worse, and languages that *do* support this sort of thing more easily are... an acquired taste (difficult to get used to unless you start off with them, which is rare these days).
// This is the "expression" type we will usestruct expression { virtual int operator() (int n);}// We'll define a subtype of "expression" for each actual formula we need in // the code, then rely on polymorphism.struct squaredPlusFour : expression { int operator() (int n) { return n*n + 4; }}// Since we're passing in objects and require polymorphism, passing by reference// (or pointer) is critical - otherwise the object will be "sliced"int eval(const expression& e) { int n=10; // Apply the formula to the local value return e(n);}int main() { // We create an anonymous squaredPlusFour object, and pass it to the function eval(squaredPlusFour()); // Since it was stack-allocated, it disappears at end of scope}Java improves on this by allowing you to specify the expression code at the point where you create the object (and also makes all the polymorphism stuff easier to deal with), but worsens it by requiring a normal named method instead of an "operator()" overload. Other languages in the same "family" are generally not much better or worse, and languages that *do* support this sort of thing more easily are... an acquired taste (difficult to get used to unless you start off with them, which is rare these days).
Author
ok, that's kindof helpful, but it smells hard. I'll file this int my todo. exactly what I'm trying to do:
This particular case counts the number of walls adjoining the square (j,i), but I would like to make it a function that can count monsters, or doors, or open doors with monsters standing in them. thanks for all your help, but it looks ike i've got more to learn before I try something like this.
for(i=0; i<mapmaxy-1; i++) { for(j=0; j<mapmaxx-1; j++) { k=0; //count the neihgbors of a cell if (map[j+1][i+1].wall==1) {k++;} //if map is to be spherical, have the if (map[j][i+1].wall==1) //edges detect neighbors on the other {k++;} //side of the map. if (map[j-1][i+1].wall==1) {k++;} if (map[j+1].wall==1) {k++;} if (map[j-1].wall==1) {k++;} if (map[j+1][i-1].wall==1) {k++;} if (map[j][i-1].wall==1) {k++;} if (map[j-1][i-1].wall==1) {k++;} } }return k;This particular case counts the number of walls adjoining the square (j,i), but I would like to make it a function that can count monsters, or doors, or open doors with monsters standing in them. thanks for all your help, but it looks ike i've got more to learn before I try something like this.
This topic is closed to new replies.
Advertisement
Popular Topics
Advertisement
