• Announcements

    • khawk

      Download the Game Design and Indie Game Marketing Freebook   07/19/17

      GameDev.net and CRC Press have teamed up to bring a free ebook of content curated from top titles published by CRC Press. The freebook, Practices of Game Design & Indie Game Marketing, includes chapters from The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, and An Architectural Approach to Level Design. The GameDev.net FreeBook is relevant to game designers, developers, and those interested in learning more about the challenges in game development. We know game development can be a tough discipline and business, so we picked several chapters from CRC Press titles that we thought would be of interest to you, the GameDev.net audience, in your journey to design, develop, and market your next game. The free ebook is available through CRC Press by clicking here. The Curated Books The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, Second Edition, by Jesse Schell Presents 100+ sets of questions, or different lenses, for viewing a game’s design, encompassing diverse fields such as psychology, architecture, music, film, software engineering, theme park design, mathematics, anthropology, and more. Written by one of the world's top game designers, this book describes the deepest and most fundamental principles of game design, demonstrating how tactics used in board, card, and athletic games also work in video games. It provides practical instruction on creating world-class games that will be played again and again. View it here. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, by Joel Dreskin Marketing is an essential but too frequently overlooked or minimized component of the release plan for indie games. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing provides you with the tools needed to build visibility and sell your indie games. With special focus on those developers with small budgets and limited staff and resources, this book is packed with tangible recommendations and techniques that you can put to use immediately. As a seasoned professional of the indie game arena, author Joel Dreskin gives you insight into practical, real-world experiences of marketing numerous successful games and also provides stories of the failures. View it here. An Architectural Approach to Level Design This is one of the first books to integrate architectural and spatial design theory with the field of level design. The book presents architectural techniques and theories for level designers to use in their own work. It connects architecture and level design in different ways that address the practical elements of how designers construct space and the experiential elements of how and why humans interact with this space. Throughout the text, readers learn skills for spatial layout, evoking emotion through gamespaces, and creating better levels through architectural theory. View it here. Learn more and download the ebook by clicking here. Did you know? GameDev.net and CRC Press also recently teamed up to bring GDNet+ Members up to a 20% discount on all CRC Press books. Learn more about this and other benefits here.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

komi

The newest and HOTTEST 3D Engine!

19 posts in this topic

Anything above 70 or 80fps is utterly useless, as your monitor isn't capable of refreshing that fast.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
How many times have people asked me that? Well, here's something to think about...

Uh... let's say that our engine ran at 250fps. And another engine ran 90fps. To the 90 engine, we added some moving objects, buildings, ect. An the FPS rate went down to about 75. Now you can gradually see a difference in speed with your eye. Let's say we do the same thing with our engine, and it goes down to 235fps. You couldn't notice a difference because it hasn't gone down below your screen monitor rate. So we could still ADD more with our engine, without the public noticing a difference in speed, while if we kept adding more to our 90 engine, the more you add, the slower the game,and thus wise the public sees the difference. Hope that helped.

------------------
-komi

http://matrix3d.cjb.net

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
wow great webpage. Not only do you NOT provide a way to skip your flashy intro, but once you get past it, all that comes up is an add banner. Whoopee! Way to impress us all!
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Throwing out frame rates for an engine is essentially meaningly unless we know the context in which the test was run. I downloaded the demo and I saw 5 texture mapped cubes, 4 of them rotating at over 300 fps. But this is processing a meager 30 quads or perhaps 60 triangles.

You really need to create a complex scene for a demo which really pushes your engine to its limits to impress people, not by showing something that resembles an OpenGL tutorial program. I suggest building a mini-game of some sort where the player can at least walk around the environment because unless the developers of an engine are using it to build a game people will always be suspect of its quality and no one wants to invest a lot of time/money into an untested technology.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Tried to go to your site, only saw an annoying Flash intro followed by a banner. Maybe the banner runs at 300fps?
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Ahhh
I hate flash

It doesnt let you skip the pointless animations and get the data.

I recommend an HTML & Flash version...

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Last count my engine got 900fps. If I try to do more than one triangle it goes down though

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I get 2000 fps on my first demo! Yeah, that's right, the whole thing takes .0005 seconds per frame! However, it has a, although I might say very nice, black screen

I HATE stupid plugs like this! This belongs in a special forum called "Trash Bin" because not only is this an "Your Announcement" but its a stinky one.

- Splat

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I home you thanked Jeff Molofee(NeHe) for the source code to your engine, now that was tutorial 7 right?

Nice try,
Nomad

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
OMG! Priceless!

"Matrix 3D is a poweful commercial engine, used to create high quality games. The engine is under design by Joe, and Eric. The engine will be sold to separte commercial companies interested in buying Matrix 3D"

(note, I made no typos in that)

Funny, I've never seen a game made with Matrix 3D, and the website certainly doesn't list any. But I am impressed, because I've seen "Joe"'s and "Eric"'s before - they are high profile developers < /sarcasm >

I wish I knew what "separte" is because I'm sure its crucial to understanding this paragraph.

Oh yeah, after "you are being exited from Matrix 3D" and I stopped laughing, it took me right back in! Gees, I guess they can't afford to let people be "exited" in peace...

< /senseless beating of poor game engine developers >

- Splat

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
FPS can also stand for "first-person shooter", but you can always tell which abbreviation it is based on the context in which it is used.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
foofightr: You have to wait quite some time. It's an annoying Flash site, that takes ages to load and even longer to display completely...

/Alex

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi !!

I really agree with all of you. Showing a few cubes and saying that engine is fast, well that sucks. I am also developing a 3D Engine and I think it's quite fast, too, but I don't think Transformations or pure Rendering is what makes an engine fast. All engines share more or less the same code for Matrix and Vector-Math and even more the same renderer (Direct3D or OpenGL). If an engine with a software renderer is much faster than an engine doing the same in software then I am impressed, but when doing Hardware-Rendering .... !! I think rendering itself is quite fast now (Tranformations, Projections, Rendering Triangles).

But when it comes to Virtual Machines (For Scripting), Skeletal Animation Systems and stuff then it gets interesting and getting stuff like that fast is the key to get a fast 3D Engine. I have finished my scripting language PumpScript and it's Virtual Machine, and when I implemented it in my engine the framerates dropped about 50% (a few items were rotated and translated by scripts). After hours of tweaking everything went with just a hit of about 5-10% which can't be noticed.

Phillip Schuster

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I have to disagree with Phillip regarding what qualities make an engine fast. Nearly every 3D game in existence spends a majority of its processing time on the rendering of the graphics. Engines differ greatly in their data structures and organization of data to send to through the graphics pipeline and it is up to the development team to show off what the engine is good at and hide what it is poor at. For example, the Quake engines are great at what they do (static, indoor geometry using BSP trees and PVS) but imagine if someone made a Tribes-like level for Quake I/II/III, it'd be terrible.

I am not saying that AI (which for convienence will encompass virtual machines, skeletal animations, etc. which Phillip mentioned) is inferior to graphics, I'm just trying to point out that a game with a highly-optimized rendering engine and partially-optimized AI will generally run at a higher framerate on the same computer configuration as would a partially-optimized rendering engine and highly-optimized AI.

AI has generally been receiving a high percentage of CPU usage in today's games versus a year or two ago and this is a good thing.

And for reference I should state that I work on AI and general game logic professionally and graphics as a hobby.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The newest, hottest, and FASTEST 3D engine in design is "MATRIX 3D. This engine can currentlt process 350fps! With added texture and sky, it should run around 300fps! One of the FASTEST! Please visit there site at:
http://matrix3d.cjb.net

------------------
-komi

http://matrix3d.cjb.net

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I laughed so hard at this one that I couldn''t resist at bringing it back.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites