Sign in to follow this  
d h k

OpenGL Floor Reflections

Recommended Posts

Hello everyone, I read the brief article about reflections with OpenGL here at gamedev.net and am trying to include this cool looking effect into my own project. My game uses 3-dimensional tiles ( 5 x 20 for now with each a size of 2 x 1 x 3 [some exceptions] ) - will adding the reflection to all those tiles decrease performance (a lot)? Is the current "draw_scene ( )" funtion correct or do I have some mistake in there that I don't know of? This function makes my game first minimize and then when I maximize it, it is really slow...
void draw_scene ( void )
{

  // clear the screen
  glClear(GL_COLOR_BUFFER_BIT | GL_DEPTH_BUFFER_BIT | GL_STENCIL_BUFFER_BIT);

  // reset the matrix
  glLoadIdentity ( );

  // draw the user
  user.draw ( );

  glLoadIdentity ( );
  /* Don't update color or depth. */
  glDisable(GL_DEPTH_TEST);
  glColorMask(GL_FALSE, GL_FALSE, GL_FALSE, GL_FALSE);

  /* Draw 1 into the stencil buffer. */
  glEnable(GL_STENCIL_TEST);
  glStencilOp(GL_REPLACE, GL_REPLACE, GL_REPLACE);
  glStencilFunc(GL_ALWAYS, 1, 0xffffffff);

  /* Now drawing the floor just tags the floor pixels
     as stencil value 1. */
  // draw the tiles
	for ( int x = 0; x < MAP_WIDTH; x++ )
	{
		for ( int y = 0; y < MAP_LENGTH; y++ )
		{
			tile[x][y].position.x = (float) x;
			tile[x][y].position.y = 0.0f;
			tile[x][y].position.z = (float) y;
			tile[x][y].draw ( );
		}
	}

  /* Re-enable update of color and depth. */ 
  glColorMask(GL_TRUE, GL_TRUE, GL_TRUE, GL_TRUE);
  glEnable(GL_DEPTH_TEST);

  /* Now, only render where stencil is set to 1. */
  glStencilFunc(GL_EQUAL, 1, 0xffffffff);  /* draw if stencil ==1 */
  glStencilOp(GL_KEEP, GL_KEEP, GL_KEEP);

  /* Draw reflected ninja, but only where floor is. */
  glPushMatrix();
    glScalef(1.0, -1.0, 1.0);
    // draw the user
	user.draw ( );
  glPopMatrix();

  glDisable(GL_STENCIL_TEST);
}

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
For reflections, I'd say you need to draw your entire scene (more or less) two-three times more... so, take the time needed for one frame, and simply multiply by three... :D

but then again, that's the result of my engine, not facts.. hehe.

cheers!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Update: It turned out that minimization thing was caused by something different... I have cleaned up the "draw_scene" function now and tested several things, but nothing has worked entirely correct yet...

This is the best version so far:


void draw_scene ( void )
{
// clear the screen
glClear(GL_COLOR_BUFFER_BIT | GL_DEPTH_BUFFER_BIT | GL_STENCIL_BUFFER_BIT);

glColorMask(GL_FALSE, GL_FALSE, GL_FALSE, GL_FALSE);
glEnable(GL_STENCIL_TEST);
glStencilOp(GL_REPLACE, GL_REPLACE, GL_REPLACE);
glStencilFunc(GL_ALWAYS, 1, 0xffffffff);

glLoadIdentity ( );

// draw the tiles
for ( int x = 0; x < MAP_WIDTH; x++ )
{
for ( int y = 0; y < MAP_LENGTH; y++ )
{
if ( tile[x][y].type == STANDARD )
{
tile[x][y].position.x = (float) x;
tile[x][y].position.y = 0.0f;
tile[x][y].position.z = (float) y;
tile[x][y].draw ( );
}
}
}

glLoadIdentity ( );

glColorMask(GL_TRUE, GL_TRUE, GL_TRUE, GL_TRUE);

glStencilFunc(GL_EQUAL, 1, 0xffffffff);
glStencilOp(GL_KEEP, GL_KEEP, GL_KEEP);

glScalef(1.0, -1.0, 1.0);
glTranslatef ( 0.0f, 5.0f, 0.0f );

glEnable(GL_BLEND );
glColor4f(1.0f,1.0f,1.0f,0.4f);
glBlendFunc(GL_SRC_ALPHA,GL_ONE);

user.draw ( );

glDisable(GL_BLEND);

glPopMatrix();
glDisable(GL_STENCIL_TEST);

glLoadIdentity ( );

user.draw ( );

glLoadIdentity ( );

// move camera behind the ball
glTranslatef ( user.sphere.position.x, -CAM_HEIGHT, user.sphere.position.z );

// draw the tiles
for ( x = 0; x < MAP_WIDTH; x++ )
{
for ( int y = 0; y < MAP_LENGTH; y++ )
{
if ( tile[x][y].type == STANDARD )
{
glEnable(GL_BLEND );
glColor4f(1.0f,1.0f,1.0f,0.2f);
glBlendFunc(GL_SRC_ALPHA,GL_ONE);
}
tile[x][y].position.x = (float) x;
tile[x][y].position.y = 0.0f;
tile[x][y].position.z = (float) y;
tile[x][y].draw ( );
if ( tile[x][y].type == STANDARD )
{
glDisable(GL_BLEND);
}
}
}
}



This is really slow and it draws the reflection everywhere - not only on the tile ground... So it seems like the whole stencil buffer thing is not working, but what exactly is wrong?

Thanks for your reply though - keep them coming please.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Something you may want to do is look into drawing the scene inverted to a texture (via pbuffer or glTexSubImage). Then though projective texturing you can multi texture your tiles or what ever with this reflection. This is the same method used for doing a vast majority of the reflective water you see every one doing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sounds similar to an issue I had when I didn't read the nehe stencil test article properly. Have you specified the number of stencil buffer bits in the pixelformatdescriptor of your window setup code?

taken from the NeHe article:


static PIXELFORMATDESCRIPTOR pfd= // pfd Tells Windows How We Want Things To Be
{
sizeof(PIXELFORMATDESCRIPTOR), // Size Of This Pixel Format Descriptor
1, // Version Number
PFD_DRAW_TO_WINDOW | // Format Must Support Window
PFD_SUPPORT_OPENGL | // Format Must Support OpenGL
PFD_DOUBLEBUFFER, // Must Support Double Buffering
PFD_TYPE_RGBA, // Request An RGBA Format
bits, // Select Our Color Depth
0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, // Color Bits Ignored
0, // No Alpha Buffer
0, // Shift Bit Ignored
0, // No Accumulation Buffer
0, 0, 0, 0, // Accumulation Bits Ignored
16, // 16Bit Z-Buffer (Depth Buffer)
1, // Use Stencil Buffer ( * Important * )
0, // No Auxiliary Buffer
PFD_MAIN_PLANE, // Main Drawing Layer
0, // Reserved
0, 0, 0 // Layer Masks Ignored
};

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Sign in to follow this  

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      627752
    • Total Posts
      2978928
  • Similar Content

    • By DelicateTreeFrog
      Hello! As an exercise for delving into modern OpenGL, I'm creating a simple .obj renderer. I want to support things like varying degrees of specularity, geometry opacity, things like that, on a per-material basis. Different materials can also have different textures. Basic .obj necessities. I've done this in old school OpenGL, but modern OpenGL has its own thing going on, and I'd like to conform as closely to the standards as possible so as to keep the program running correctly, and I'm hoping to avoid picking up bad habits this early on.
      Reading around on the OpenGL Wiki, one tip in particular really stands out to me on this page:
      For something like a renderer for .obj files, this sort of thing seems almost ideal, but according to the wiki, it's a bad idea. Interesting to note!
      So, here's what the plan is so far as far as loading goes:
      Set up a type for materials so that materials can be created and destroyed. They will contain things like diffuse color, diffuse texture, geometry opacity, and so on, for each material in the .mtl file. Since .obj files are conveniently split up by material, I can load different groups of vertices/normals/UVs and triangles into different blocks of data for different models. When it comes to the rendering, I get a bit lost. I can either:
      Between drawing triangle groups, call glUseProgram to use a different shader for that particular geometry (so a unique shader just for the material that is shared by this triangle group). or
      Between drawing triangle groups, call glUniform a few times to adjust different parameters within the "master shader", such as specularity, diffuse color, and geometry opacity. In both cases, I still have to call glBindTexture between drawing triangle groups in order to bind the diffuse texture used by the material, so there doesn't seem to be a way around having the CPU do *something* during the rendering process instead of letting the GPU do everything all at once.
      The second option here seems less cluttered, however. There are less shaders to keep up with while one "master shader" handles it all. I don't have to duplicate any code or compile multiple shaders. Arguably, I could always have the shader program for each material be embedded in the material itself, and be auto-generated upon loading the material from the .mtl file. But this still leads to constantly calling glUseProgram, much more than is probably necessary in order to properly render the .obj. There seem to be a number of differing opinions on if it's okay to use hundreds of shaders or if it's best to just use tens of shaders.
      So, ultimately, what is the "right" way to do this? Does using a "master shader" (or a few variants of one) bog down the system compared to using hundreds of shader programs each dedicated to their own corresponding materials? Keeping in mind that the "master shaders" would have to track these additional uniforms and potentially have numerous branches of ifs, it may be possible that the ifs will lead to additional and unnecessary processing. But would that more expensive than constantly calling glUseProgram to switch shaders, or storing the shaders to begin with?
      With all these angles to consider, it's difficult to come to a conclusion. Both possible methods work, and both seem rather convenient for their own reasons, but which is the most performant? Please help this beginner/dummy understand. Thank you!
    • By JJCDeveloper
      I want to make professional java 3d game with server program and database,packet handling for multiplayer and client-server communicating,maps rendering,models,and stuffs Which aspect of java can I learn and where can I learn java Lwjgl OpenGL rendering Like minecraft and world of tanks
    • By AyeRonTarpas
      A friend of mine and I are making a 2D game engine as a learning experience and to hopefully build upon the experience in the long run.

      -What I'm using:
          C++;. Since im learning this language while in college and its one of the popular language to make games with why not.     Visual Studios; Im using a windows so yea.     SDL or GLFW; was thinking about SDL since i do some research on it where it is catching my interest but i hear SDL is a huge package compared to GLFW, so i may do GLFW to start with as learning since i may get overwhelmed with SDL.  
      -Questions
      Knowing what we want in the engine what should our main focus be in terms of learning. File managements, with headers, functions ect. How can i properly manage files with out confusing myself and my friend when sharing code. Alternative to Visual studios: My friend has a mac and cant properly use Vis studios, is there another alternative to it?  
    • By ferreiradaselva
      Both functions are available since 3.0, and I'm currently using `glMapBuffer()`, which works fine.
      But, I was wondering if anyone has experienced advantage in using `glMapBufferRange()`, which allows to specify the range of the mapped buffer. Could this be only a safety measure or does it improve performance?
      Note: I'm not asking about glBufferSubData()/glBufferData. Those two are irrelevant in this case.
    • By xhcao
      Before using void glBindImageTexture(    GLuint unit, GLuint texture, GLint level, GLboolean layered, GLint layer, GLenum access, GLenum format), does need to make sure that texture is completeness. 
  • Popular Now