# Help with Chain Rule problem (Solved)

This topic is 4486 days old which is more than the 365 day threshold we allow for new replies. Please post a new topic.

## Recommended Posts

I've been stuck on this for the last 20 minutes, trying to figure out why the back of my book is getting the answer it is. Here's the problem and what I've done: And yes, this is (non-graded) homework.

The Problem
Find: dy/dx at x = 2
Given: y = (s+3)^2 , s = sqrt(t - 3), t = x^2

So I know I'm just finding dx/dy (which according to the chain rule is just (dy/ds)*(ds/dt)*(dt/dx)). Here's what I get for those values:
dy/ds = ((s+3)(s+3))' = (s^2 + 6s + 9)' = 2s + 6
ds/dt = (sqrt(t - 3))' = sqrt(1) = 1
dt/dx = (x^2)' = 2x

So my equation is: dy/dx = (2s + 6) * (1) * (2x) Putting in 2s + 6 = 2(sqrt(t - 3) + 6) = 2(sqrt(x^2 - 3) + 6) So the final solution is:
(2(1) + 6) * (1) * (4) = 8 * 4 = 32.

The book says the solution is 16, so either I'm making a really stupid mistake somewhere or the book is wrong. I'm thinking the first case is more likely than the second. [Edited by - ontheheap on October 12, 2005 7:00:47 AM]

##### Share on other sites
It might help to remember that square roots can be written as that quantity to the 1/2 power.

##### Share on other sites
I just looked again. Judging by how you solved dy/ds, you are not understanding the chain rule entirely.

You should not expand that first. Use the chain rule to get 2s+6

##### Share on other sites
Thanks Thermodynamic. I see where I made the mistake and now I'm getting 16 as the final answer. I appreciate the help!

Just to clarify where I made the mistake (in case anyone cares):

I wrongly assumed that (sqrt(t-3))' was 1. It should be:

f(t) = t^(1/2)
g(t) = t - 3

f'(t) = (1/2)t^(-1/2)
g'(t) = 1

f'(g(t)) * g'(t) = f'(t-3) * 1 = :

1/2 * 1 / sqrt(t-3) = 1 / 2 * sqrt(t-3) which ends up being 1/2 when x = 2. That explains why I was getting 32 instead of 16 as my final answer!

[Edited by - ontheheap on October 11, 2005 9:26:40 PM]

##### Share on other sites
have you learned how to make diagrams for this stuff? it's really simple if you learn how to make a diagram, you don't even have to remeber the various forms of the rule, this will help you a lot when you have to deal with multivariable functions, where it gets hairy.

x = f(s), s = g(t)

x-->s--->t

so dx/dt = (dx/ds)*(ds/dt)

a more complicated example

x = f(s, t), s = g(a), t = h(a)

you have
x->s->a
x->t->a

(generally this is written with just one x, but ascii suck on the board so)

just add the two, but notice we got two choices when we first leave x, those are s, and t. when we have two choices we use partial dirivative signs. we then add the respective contributions.

dx/da = (px/ps)*(ds/da) + (px/pt)*(dt/da)

note: this is why it's not a good idea to simply think of them as baing ratios, when you have partials, you can't think that way.

also that thing you made the mistake on is also a chain rule, suppose you reformulate your problem as

y = a^2, a = s+3, s = sqrt(b), b = t - 3, t = x^2

here I just used the chain rule explicitly instead of implicitly. then you got

dy/dx = dy/da*da/ds*ds/db*db/dt*dt/dx

try it lol, it avoids your mistake. at the cost of more work.

Tim

##### Share on other sites
Quote:
 Original post by timwy = a^2, a = s+3, s = sqrt(b), b = t - 3, t = x^2here I just used the chain rule explicitly instead of implicitly. then you gotdy/dx = dy/da*da/ds*ds/db*db/dt*dt/dxtry it lol, it avoids your mistake. at the cost of more work.Tim

That's much clearer than the way I was doing it (using the dx/dy notation for part of it and f() g() for the other part). Thanks. We haven't reached partial derivatives yet (and I don't think I'll see them until at least next semester), but thanks for the info all the same.

##### Share on other sites
Quote:
 Original post by ontheheapAnd yes, this is (non-graded) homework.

Read the Forum FAQ. Homework/schoolwork is a violation of forum policy. Thread closing. I don't feel the outcome here was harmful, but please do not post homework problems here again.

##### Share on other sites

This topic is 4486 days old which is more than the 365 day threshold we allow for new replies. Please post a new topic.

This topic is now closed to further replies.