Sign in to follow this  
brucile

OpenGL efficiency of combining CPU and GPU by multiple threads

Recommended Posts

brucile    122
I want to know the efficiency of combining CPU and GPU by multiple threads. The idea is that, when CPU performs some computation(has nothing to do with thread), a thread will run a complex shader on GPU( this shader has many math calculation and texture access, it takes 0.008 seconds to finish on my computer:WinXP,Nvidia Quadro FX1000). Below is the pseudo-code for the thread ; Thread(){ initGlew(); initGlut(); initOpenGL(); while(1){ DownloadDataToGPU();// 48 bytes long data DrawQuad(); //a pixel shader with math compute and texture access. glFinish(); ReadBackData(); //using glReadPixel() } } I run many test instances, it seems that by using such kind of multiple thread, the CPU will slow down by 15%. Calling of glFinish() consumes most of the time. My question is, when calling glfinish(), GPU should begin to work and the thread should be blocked, so that control is given to CPU. In this way, calling of glFinish() shouldn’t cost too much time. Any hints for me ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
rollo    366
First of all, you shouldnt need glFinish at all. When you do the readback gl will make sure that all needed operations are already performed.

Second, it really kills parallelism between CPU/GPU to use glFinish. glFinish means that the CPU should stall and wait for GPU to finish performing all your commands. Unless DownloadDataToGPU needs the result from ReadBackData right away I think you could get much improved performance by using PBOs instead of a plain glReadPixels and just remove the call to glFinish.

Quote:
From the PBO spec:

Asynchronous glReadPixels: If an application needs to read back a
number of images and process them with the CPU, the existing GL
interface makes it nearly impossible to pipeline this operation.
The driver will typically send the hardware a readback command
when glReadPixels is called, and then wait for all of the data to
be available before returning control to the application. Then,
the application can either process the data immediately or call
glReadPixels again; in neither case will the readback overlap with
the processing. If the application issues several readbacks
into several buffer objects, however, and then maps each one to
process its data, then the readbacks can proceed in parallel with
the data processing.

(see Example 3 at the bottom of the document too).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
brucile    122
Sorry, I have made more experiments, it seems that glReadPixel() is the bottleneck. it consumes 5/6 of overhead time introduced by thread. I should swtich to PBO.

Is there any other ways to speedup readback ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
rollo    366
It is possible that some pixel formats will perform better than others, you would have to experiment to find out the best one for you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
brucile    122
I read specification of PBO, it seems I have to combine PBO with Pbuffer or FBO. otherwise, if I render to frame buffer, the value will be clamped into 0,1.
is it correct ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
rollo    366
That is true. If you need values outside 0,1 you either have to render to a floating point texture, or be clever and pack your float result into the normal RGB components. I have never done that myself, but unless you are targeting old hardware I would just go with a fp texture for simplicity.

I really recommend going with FBOs instead of pbuffers. A lot easier to work with and more efficient. Just make sure you have updated drivers.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Sign in to follow this  

  • Partner Spotlight

  • Similar Content

    • By pseudomarvin
      I assumed that if a shader is computationally expensive then the execution is just slower. But running the following GLSL FS instead just crashes
      void main() { float x = 0; float y = 0; int sum = 0; for (float x = 0; x < 10; x += 0.00005) { for (float y = 0; y < 10; y += 0.00005) { sum++; } } fragColor = vec4(1, 1, 1 , 1.0); } with unhandled exception in nvoglv32.dll. Are there any hard limits on the number of steps/time that a shader can take before it is shut down? I was thinking about implementing some time intensive computation in shaders where it would take on the order of seconds to compute a frame, is that possible? Thanks.
    • By Arulbabu Donbosco
      There are studios selling applications which is just copying any 3Dgraphic content and regenerating into another new window. especially for CAVE Virtual reality experience. so that the user opens REvite or CAD or any other 3D applications and opens a model. then when the user selects the rendered window the VR application copies the 3D model information from the OpenGL window. 
      I got the clue that the VR application replaces the windows opengl32.dll file. how this is possible ... how can we copy the 3d content from the current OpenGL window.
      anyone, please help me .. how to go further... to create an application like VR CAVE. 
       
      Thanks
    • By cebugdev
      hi all,

      i am trying to build an OpenGL 2D GUI system, (yeah yeah, i know i should not be re inventing the wheel, but this is for educational and some other purpose only),
      i have built GUI system before using 2D systems such as that of HTML/JS canvas, but in 2D system, i can directly match a mouse coordinates to the actual graphic coordinates with additional computation for screen size/ratio/scale ofcourse.
      now i want to port it to OpenGL, i know that to render a 2D object in OpenGL we specify coordiantes in Clip space or use the orthographic projection, now heres what i need help about.
      1. what is the right way of rendering the GUI? is it thru drawing in clip space or switching to ortho projection?
      2. from screen coordinates (top left is 0,0 nd bottom right is width height), how can i map the mouse coordinates to OpenGL 2D so that mouse events such as button click works? In consideration ofcourse to the current screen/size dimension.
      3. when let say if the screen size/dimension is different, how to handle this? in my previous javascript 2D engine using canvas, i just have my working coordinates and then just perform the bitblk or copying my working canvas to screen canvas and scale the mouse coordinates from there, in OpenGL how to work on a multiple screen sizes (more like an OpenGL ES question).
      lastly, if you guys know any books, resources, links or tutorials that handle or discuss this, i found one with marekknows opengl game engine website but its not free,
      Just let me know. Did not have any luck finding resource in google for writing our own OpenGL GUI framework.
      IF there are no any available online, just let me know, what things do i need to look into for OpenGL and i will study them one by one to make it work.
      thank you, and looking forward to positive replies.
    • By fllwr0491
      I have a few beginner questions about tesselation that I really have no clue.
      The opengl wiki doesn't seem to talk anything about the details.
       
      What is the relationship between TCS layout out and TES layout in?
      How does the tesselator know how control points are organized?
          e.g. If TES input requests triangles, but TCS can output N vertices.
             What happens in this case?
      In this article,
      http://www.informit.com/articles/article.aspx?p=2120983
      the isoline example TCS out=4, but TES in=isoline.
      And gl_TessCoord is only a single one.
      So which ones are the control points?
      How are tesselator building primitives?
    • By Orella
      I've been developing a 2D Engine using SFML + ImGui.
      Here you can see an image
      The editor is rendered using ImGui and the scene window is a sf::RenderTexture where I draw the GameObjects and then is converted to ImGui::Image to render it in the editor.
      Now I need to create a 3D Engine during this year in my Bachelor Degree but using SDL2 + ImGui and I want to recreate what I did with the 2D Engine. 
      I've managed to render the editor like I did in the 2D Engine using this example that comes with ImGui. 
      3D Editor preview
      But I don't know how to create an equivalent of sf::RenderTexture in SDL2, so I can draw the 3D scene there and convert it to ImGui::Image to show it in the editor.
      If you can provide code will be better. And if you want me to provide any specific code tell me.
      Thanks!
  • Popular Now