Sign in to follow this  

OpenGL Render to texture, etc.

Recommended Posts

iNsAn1tY    476
Afternoon. I was wondering if someone could answer a few questions I have, to make absolutely sure that I'm solving some particular problems I have at the moment in the right way. Here goes: With render to texture, is there any direct OpenGL support for it, apart from glCopy[Sub]TexImage2D? The method I always saw used for render to texture was to set up a suitable viewport and projection, render to the frame buffer, then use glCopy[Sub]TexImage2D to read the frame buffer into the texture. Is this still used? Or is there a better/faster/more widely used method? When creating/implementing post-process effects (motion blur, HDR, etc.), is it still essentially a render to texture operation (in that you render the entire scene to a large texture, then process that texture in n passes to get the desired after-effect)? I understand that regular render to texture (as described above) would probably kill the frame rate. Should I use frame buffer objects for post-process effects? Is there a specific method for handling post-process effects? In vertex and fragment programs, varying and uniform variables are used. I take this to mean that varying variables can change between the vertex and fragment program (ie. the vertex program can change a texture coordinate), and uniform variables are fixed, and cannot change inside either the vertex program or fragment program. Is this correct? Does a vertex or fragment program ever change the data that is sent to it? I know these seem like silly questions. Most of them I'd be able to find out by testing, but both of my goddamn computers are broken, so I can't test anything out until they're fixed, and I need to know about these questions in the meantime. Thanks in advance for any replies. PS. There are no hardware constraints; I'm looking for the best and fastest methods available.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
derodo    122
Well, let's see if I can be of any help.

First off, yes, post processing effects always need a previous render step. The easiest way for doing it is just by doing what you say: "change the viewport size to some valid texture size, render, then use glCopyTexImage2D or something similar".

The problem with this is that it completely trashes whatever previous rendering operations you were doing in the framebuffer, so you need to adapt your engine code to make the actual rendering pass the last one; that is, you first perform all the post process framebuffers, and once you got them, proceed with the final render.

This can be quite messy, so, [un]fortunately, there're some GL extensions you can use to make things "easier", like the "render to texture" (can't remember the exact name)...but then, you need to be sure the extension is supported by the current graphics card :( But if it is, then you just can "bind" a texture to the GL, so all rendering operations can be sent to it, keeping the standard framebuffer "safe" until you "unbind" it to continue your normal rendering.

Take a look at the OpenGL site and check the extensions; there should be some one called "GL_EXT_framebuffer_object" or similar. Or you can visit, they have made a tiny little free program called "OpenGL Extensions Viewer" that can help you find wich card supports wich extension, and can look the extension specificacions for you in the OpenGL site :P

And regarding shaders and GLSL, yes: you're right. Uniforms are some kind of "vertex shader local variables" than can't be modified during the vertex program's execution, but can be changed programatically through the GL API before the actual rendering takes place.

The "varyings" are some kind of "comunication mechanism" the vertex shader can use to pass information to the fragment shader. Basically the vertex shader can pass any float value to the fragment shader, but that value will be interpolated (linearly I guess) acrosss all fragments; so if the vertex shader sets a varying to 1.0 as the result for the first vertex of a line, and a 0.0 as the result for the second vertex, then the fragments belonging to the linle will be receiving a linear progression of values going smoothly from 1.0 to 0.0.


Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
bluntman    255
Pixel buffer objects are what you should try and use for RTT. You can set them as render target, or buffer with single calls:

bool PBuffer::BindAsRenderTarget()
m_holdDC = wglGetCurrentDC();
m_holdGLRC = wglGetCurrentContext();

if (!wglMakeCurrent(m_hDC, m_hGLRC))

m_bIsCurrent = true;

void PBuffer::BindAsTexture()
if (!m_bIsTexture)

wglBindTexImageARB(m_hPBuffer, WGL_FRONT_LEFT_ARB);

m_bIsBound = true;

Pretty straight forward to use, a total pain to set up.

On vertex / fragment programs:
'varying' variables are ones which the GPU will interpolate for you across the triangle, as it does with color, normal, and UVs. 'uniform' variables are not interpolated.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
derodo    122
Mmmm...I tried pbuffers too, and I was really disappointed by the poor performance they showed.

Basically you need to make a reder context change for each pbuffer you want to render to, and that could be a real pain as it involves lot of GL state.

Besides, if not specified, pbuffers do NOT share texture objects, and if you make the GL call to make it share texture objects among pbuffers, then the render context change is even slower.

I would rather use the GL_EXT_framebuffer_object or whatever the extension name is, as it doesn't imply a context switch. So it *should* be faster. The only problem is that it is a relative "new" extension, so not all cards may support it.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
_the_phantom_    11250
firstly, pbuffers != Pixel buffer objects, PBOs are a different extension which enable the functions which read back from the framebuffer todo so async.

The modern way to do RTT is via frame buffer objects (FBO) as derodo pointed out. They should be supported on anything from the 9500 up from ATI and from the GFFX series from NV. The speed and features might vary however.

However, while they might be only for newer hardware, they are MUCH nicer to work with and considerably more flexible, if only because you are getting a TRUE RRT, not a proxy system like you do with pbuffers.

That said, for all their faults pbuffers do still have their useage as they are a completely new context and as such are completely self contained and there are times when you need this functionality.

As for the shading question;
As pointed out varying change across the face of a polygon, uniforms are more like 'per object' variables (well, per polygon, but there is a fair amount of overhead when it comes to changing them so per object or per batch of objects is a better useage pattern).

As for changing the data sent to them, shaders do change it however vertex shaders can only read from uniform and attribute variables and write out to varying variables. On the other hand fragment programs can only write out to the framebuffer and read from varying and uniforms (and ofcourse textures). Neither can write to uniforms, think of them as run-time constants.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
zedzeek    529
from my testing FBO is only maximum 10% faster (in benchmark) than using the backbuffer and updating a texture with glCopyTexSubImage2d(..)
so dont expect speed increases from using them
the FBO whilst not much quicker does offer other benifits eg, youre not limited to the framebuffers constraints

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
hplus0603    11356
FBO is the immediate equivalent of setting a texture surface as render target in DirectX.

However, render-to-surface textures may perform poorly if you use them in an arbitrary alignment, whereas they will perform well if you just use it as a screen-aligned texture. This is because they're usually not tiled on the card, but instead stored with regular scanline alignment.

Meanwhile, CopyTexSubImage textures (the equivalent of using StretchRect blits in D3D9, I think) will swizzle the texture data to perform equally well in all alignments, so if you don't just use the RTT as a screen overlay or multi-pass, the blit might actually be better.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Sign in to follow this  

  • Similar Content

    • By pseudomarvin
      I assumed that if a shader is computationally expensive then the execution is just slower. But running the following GLSL FS instead just crashes
      void main() { float x = 0; float y = 0; int sum = 0; for (float x = 0; x < 10; x += 0.00005) { for (float y = 0; y < 10; y += 0.00005) { sum++; } } fragColor = vec4(1, 1, 1 , 1.0); } with unhandled exception in nvoglv32.dll. Are there any hard limits on the number of steps/time that a shader can take before it is shut down? I was thinking about implementing some time intensive computation in shaders where it would take on the order of seconds to compute a frame, is that possible? Thanks.
    • By Arulbabu Donbosco
      There are studios selling applications which is just copying any 3Dgraphic content and regenerating into another new window. especially for CAVE Virtual reality experience. so that the user opens REvite or CAD or any other 3D applications and opens a model. then when the user selects the rendered window the VR application copies the 3D model information from the OpenGL window. 
      I got the clue that the VR application replaces the windows opengl32.dll file. how this is possible ... how can we copy the 3d content from the current OpenGL window.
      anyone, please help me .. how to go further... to create an application like VR CAVE. 
    • By cebugdev
      hi all,

      i am trying to build an OpenGL 2D GUI system, (yeah yeah, i know i should not be re inventing the wheel, but this is for educational and some other purpose only),
      i have built GUI system before using 2D systems such as that of HTML/JS canvas, but in 2D system, i can directly match a mouse coordinates to the actual graphic coordinates with additional computation for screen size/ratio/scale ofcourse.
      now i want to port it to OpenGL, i know that to render a 2D object in OpenGL we specify coordiantes in Clip space or use the orthographic projection, now heres what i need help about.
      1. what is the right way of rendering the GUI? is it thru drawing in clip space or switching to ortho projection?
      2. from screen coordinates (top left is 0,0 nd bottom right is width height), how can i map the mouse coordinates to OpenGL 2D so that mouse events such as button click works? In consideration ofcourse to the current screen/size dimension.
      3. when let say if the screen size/dimension is different, how to handle this? in my previous javascript 2D engine using canvas, i just have my working coordinates and then just perform the bitblk or copying my working canvas to screen canvas and scale the mouse coordinates from there, in OpenGL how to work on a multiple screen sizes (more like an OpenGL ES question).
      lastly, if you guys know any books, resources, links or tutorials that handle or discuss this, i found one with marekknows opengl game engine website but its not free,
      Just let me know. Did not have any luck finding resource in google for writing our own OpenGL GUI framework.
      IF there are no any available online, just let me know, what things do i need to look into for OpenGL and i will study them one by one to make it work.
      thank you, and looking forward to positive replies.
    • By fllwr0491
      I have a few beginner questions about tesselation that I really have no clue.
      The opengl wiki doesn't seem to talk anything about the details.
      What is the relationship between TCS layout out and TES layout in?
      How does the tesselator know how control points are organized?
          e.g. If TES input requests triangles, but TCS can output N vertices.
             What happens in this case?
      In this article,
      the isoline example TCS out=4, but TES in=isoline.
      And gl_TessCoord is only a single one.
      So which ones are the control points?
      How are tesselator building primitives?
    • By Orella
      I've been developing a 2D Engine using SFML + ImGui.
      Here you can see an image
      The editor is rendered using ImGui and the scene window is a sf::RenderTexture where I draw the GameObjects and then is converted to ImGui::Image to render it in the editor.
      Now I need to create a 3D Engine during this year in my Bachelor Degree but using SDL2 + ImGui and I want to recreate what I did with the 2D Engine. 
      I've managed to render the editor like I did in the 2D Engine using this example that comes with ImGui. 
      3D Editor preview
      But I don't know how to create an equivalent of sf::RenderTexture in SDL2, so I can draw the 3D scene there and convert it to ImGui::Image to show it in the editor.
      If you can provide code will be better. And if you want me to provide any specific code tell me.
  • Popular Now