Is TEXTURE_RECTANGLE faster than NPOT?

Graphics and GPU Programming Programming

Started by Code-R December 03, 2005 03:20 PM

3 comments, last by Code-R 18 years, 4 months ago

Code-R

136

Author

December 03, 2005 03:20 PM

... at least on NV4X systems?

zedzeek

529

December 04, 2005 02:02 PM

perhaps (i have no idea)
though i believe if possible use power of 2 sized textures even though nv4x supports 1022x500 a 1024x512 sized texture will be quicker

Captain Courgette, eat more veg

Code-R

136

Author

December 04, 2005 03:58 PM

no offence intended whatsoever, but is that based on speculation, some documents or profiling?

zedzeek

529

December 04, 2005 11:53 PM

this is what a nvidia driver writer said but its commonsense as well

Captain Courgette, eat more veg

Code-R

136

Author

December 05, 2005 04:41 PM

I'm not talking about POT compared to NPOT, I'm tlaking about NPOT compared to RECTANGLE...

This topic is closed to new replies.

Popular Topics

How do you manage yourself and your time as years pass on? GDNet Lounge

Too many managers? General and Gameplay Programming

Do your part to stop global warming and climate change GDNet Lounge

The promise of freedom in story games Game Design and Theory

Facebook Ads for sales on steam, does it work? Games Business and Law

Understanding the wavy-like shape in alpha-testing magnification for text rendering Graphics and GPU Programming

Is TEXTURE_RECTANGLE faster than NPOT?

This topic is closed to new replies.

Popular Topics

Recommended Tutorials

Reticulating splines