Quote:Original post by rip-off
sweet.
specialised templates i assume.
didnt know that.
Quote:Original post by SiCrane
No. The sized constructor for std::vector<> looks like:
explict vector(size_type n, const T & value = T(), const Allocator & allocator = Allocator());
The vector is constructed with n elements copy constructed from value. When no value is specified, the default argument used is T(), which in the case of T being int, turns into 0.
int main() { int i; // not initialized to anything int j = 0; // initialized to 0 int k(0); // initialized to 0 int l = int(); // initialized to 0 int m(); // not an int, but instead a function declaration :) m();}int m() { return 42;}float f;int i(f); // Warning: converting from float to intint j(int(f)); // Let's try an explicit cast... gah, a function declaration! (*int k((int)f); // Okint m(int()); // No bonus, again a function declaration :PQuote:Original post by Sharlin
And it gets better:float f;int i(f); // Warning: converting from float to intint j(int(f)); // Let's try an explicit cast... gah, a function declaration! (*int k((int)f); // Okint m(int()); // No bonus, again a function declaration :P
*) I wonder why the grammar allows parentheses around the variable name in a variable declaration in the first place...
Quote:Original post by Zahlman
That's not... oh, you mean parentheses around the parameter name in a function declaration.
Quote:Any word on whether 0x will clean this mess up?
