Sign in to follow this  

usage correct?

This topic is 4295 days old which is more than the 365 day threshold we allow for new replies. Please post a new topic.

If you intended to correct an error in the post then please contact us.

Recommended Posts

can the compiler intrinsic __noop be used safely like this within the ternary operator: ischecked ? nPlayers++ : __noop; thanks in advance. edit: the reason im asking this is because the compiler doesnt let me do this: ischecked ? nPlayers++ : ;

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I would submit that this is an abuse of ?: syntax. It's not for doing things at all, it's for selecting values, i.e.
variable = condition ? value1 : value2


It looks like what you're trying to do would be better serviced by
if(isChecked) nPlayers++;

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
GCC doesn't have __noop, so I don't know what is it. If you care to do portable could, you should try not to use it.

You can do, instead of the ternary, a single if:


if(ischecked) {
nPlayers++;
}


Since ternary (a ? b : c) is simply:


if(a) {
b;
}
else {
c;
}

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This topic is 4295 days old which is more than the 365 day threshold we allow for new replies. Please post a new topic.

If you intended to correct an error in the post then please contact us.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Sign in to follow this