Sign in to follow this  
AndyEsser

OpenGL Load OpenGL Commands From A Text File

Recommended Posts

Is it possible? I mean, say I had my simple code to render a quad within a text file glBegin bmquads glvertex3f 0,0,0 glvertex3f 0,1,0 glvertex3f 1,0,0 glvertex3f 1,1,0 glend Is there any way I can simply get OGL to loads those commands? Thanks for any help.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
No, but what you can do is store the vertices in a file, load them into a vertex array, and render them that way.

You could also read the opengl calls from the file, determine what they were through some interpretive type functions, and then call them as part of a display list creation.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
If all you were doing is quads, then you could do something like, read in the first word (i.e. the OpenGL command) and then say, if(command == "glBegin") then do some stuff, else if(command == "glVertex3f") do other stuff... But, as you can see, that can become tedious. To do what you're asking, you would need to integrate a scripting language into your program. I would recommend looking into Lua.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
not unless you want to write a mini lexer/tokeniser and parse all that crap yourself, its probrably easier to just have it load regular 3d models? i can't see any good reason for wanting to load OGL commands from a file?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The reason that i want to load ogl commands from a while is that i've written a file that interprets a VRML file from Pro/Desktop or 3ds Max and sorts all the faces etc, then you have to chose a texture as your next step, because that's not included in the VRML file. If it was then i would just load the VRML file straight into my OGL program.

Thanks for your help guys, have to think of some other way :(

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hello,

You can always load a DLL with the code. Or you can write a simple parser language as suggested above but I think it would be too complicated for the task. DLLs also allows the user to code in the language he is more comfortable with. Hope this helps,

JVFF

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote:
Original post by jvff
Hello,

You can always load a DLL with the code. Or you can write a simple parser language as suggested above but I think it would be too complicated for the task. DLLs also allows the user to code in the language he is more comfortable with. Hope this helps,

JVFF


Screw writing your own parser, if you are interested in changing certain material properties look into the shader language used for quake3.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote:
Original post by dawidjoubert
Quote:
Original post by jvff
Hello,

You can always load a DLL with the code. Or you can write a simple parser language as suggested above but I think it would be too complicated for the task. DLLs also allows the user to code in the language he is more comfortable with. Hope this helps,

JVFF


Screw writing your own parser, if you are interested in changing certain material properties look into the shader language used for quake3.


Erm, unless you write your own lexer/parser, how you do expect to parse a script similar to the one Q3 uses? Anyway you look at it, if you have a pure text input that you want to convert to anything else you're going to have some sort of parser in there.

Quite luckily however, there are some very decent parsers/lexers out there. Take a look at boost::spirit and Yacc/flex/bison.

You probably don't want to do any of that however, just look into loading standard model formats.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Ofcourse it is possible. The question is how much code you need to write for it. Function pointers would be the way to go if you ask me. Somthing allong the lines of a table that associates function names (strings) with function pointers and some way to translate the argument. A lot of this could be generated automaticaly using the infos contained in the header.

I think using lex and similar stuff would be overkill, but then I haven't used this tools much.

Edit: supposing that you want to do somthing script-like. Not only geometry. Anyway if you want to type the whole stuff, you can simply make it a function and name the file .c

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Sign in to follow this  

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      627765
    • Total Posts
      2978983
  • Similar Content

    • By DelicateTreeFrog
      Hello! As an exercise for delving into modern OpenGL, I'm creating a simple .obj renderer. I want to support things like varying degrees of specularity, geometry opacity, things like that, on a per-material basis. Different materials can also have different textures. Basic .obj necessities. I've done this in old school OpenGL, but modern OpenGL has its own thing going on, and I'd like to conform as closely to the standards as possible so as to keep the program running correctly, and I'm hoping to avoid picking up bad habits this early on.
      Reading around on the OpenGL Wiki, one tip in particular really stands out to me on this page:
      For something like a renderer for .obj files, this sort of thing seems almost ideal, but according to the wiki, it's a bad idea. Interesting to note!
      So, here's what the plan is so far as far as loading goes:
      Set up a type for materials so that materials can be created and destroyed. They will contain things like diffuse color, diffuse texture, geometry opacity, and so on, for each material in the .mtl file. Since .obj files are conveniently split up by material, I can load different groups of vertices/normals/UVs and triangles into different blocks of data for different models. When it comes to the rendering, I get a bit lost. I can either:
      Between drawing triangle groups, call glUseProgram to use a different shader for that particular geometry (so a unique shader just for the material that is shared by this triangle group). or
      Between drawing triangle groups, call glUniform a few times to adjust different parameters within the "master shader", such as specularity, diffuse color, and geometry opacity. In both cases, I still have to call glBindTexture between drawing triangle groups in order to bind the diffuse texture used by the material, so there doesn't seem to be a way around having the CPU do *something* during the rendering process instead of letting the GPU do everything all at once.
      The second option here seems less cluttered, however. There are less shaders to keep up with while one "master shader" handles it all. I don't have to duplicate any code or compile multiple shaders. Arguably, I could always have the shader program for each material be embedded in the material itself, and be auto-generated upon loading the material from the .mtl file. But this still leads to constantly calling glUseProgram, much more than is probably necessary in order to properly render the .obj. There seem to be a number of differing opinions on if it's okay to use hundreds of shaders or if it's best to just use tens of shaders.
      So, ultimately, what is the "right" way to do this? Does using a "master shader" (or a few variants of one) bog down the system compared to using hundreds of shader programs each dedicated to their own corresponding materials? Keeping in mind that the "master shaders" would have to track these additional uniforms and potentially have numerous branches of ifs, it may be possible that the ifs will lead to additional and unnecessary processing. But would that more expensive than constantly calling glUseProgram to switch shaders, or storing the shaders to begin with?
      With all these angles to consider, it's difficult to come to a conclusion. Both possible methods work, and both seem rather convenient for their own reasons, but which is the most performant? Please help this beginner/dummy understand. Thank you!
    • By JJCDeveloper
      I want to make professional java 3d game with server program and database,packet handling for multiplayer and client-server communicating,maps rendering,models,and stuffs Which aspect of java can I learn and where can I learn java Lwjgl OpenGL rendering Like minecraft and world of tanks
    • By AyeRonTarpas
      A friend of mine and I are making a 2D game engine as a learning experience and to hopefully build upon the experience in the long run.

      -What I'm using:
          C++;. Since im learning this language while in college and its one of the popular language to make games with why not.     Visual Studios; Im using a windows so yea.     SDL or GLFW; was thinking about SDL since i do some research on it where it is catching my interest but i hear SDL is a huge package compared to GLFW, so i may do GLFW to start with as learning since i may get overwhelmed with SDL.  
      -Questions
      Knowing what we want in the engine what should our main focus be in terms of learning. File managements, with headers, functions ect. How can i properly manage files with out confusing myself and my friend when sharing code. Alternative to Visual studios: My friend has a mac and cant properly use Vis studios, is there another alternative to it?  
    • By ferreiradaselva
      Both functions are available since 3.0, and I'm currently using `glMapBuffer()`, which works fine.
      But, I was wondering if anyone has experienced advantage in using `glMapBufferRange()`, which allows to specify the range of the mapped buffer. Could this be only a safety measure or does it improve performance?
      Note: I'm not asking about glBufferSubData()/glBufferData. Those two are irrelevant in this case.
    • By xhcao
      Before using void glBindImageTexture(    GLuint unit, GLuint texture, GLint level, GLboolean layered, GLint layer, GLenum access, GLenum format), does need to make sure that texture is completeness. 
  • Popular Now