Sign in to follow this  
Riviera Kid

texture question(s)

Recommended Posts

Riviera Kid    142
Is it quicker to sample a 64*64 texture than a 128*128 texture (arbitary numbers) of the same colour depth and both on the graphics memory? If there is a difference in time, why is that? I was thinking, if you have a model loaded and it is close to the camera, if you load the same model further away is there any point in loading a lower resolution texture? the way i see it, it should take the same amount of time to sample a low res texture as it does for a high res texture. you still have to fetch texture data per pixel for a 2*2 texure? or does it optimize? how is texture data managed on the graphics card? cheers

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
ET3D    810
Take a look at MIP mapping. It automatically uses smaller versions of the texture for far away models.

Smaller textures are more efficient because they allow better use of the texture cache, which is pretty small (just a few K).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Sign in to follow this